Au lendemain d'une tragédie familiale, une auteure aspirant est déchirée entre l'amour pour son amie d'enfance et la tentation d'un mystérieux étranger. Tentant d'échapper aux fantômes de so... Tout lireAu lendemain d'une tragédie familiale, une auteure aspirant est déchirée entre l'amour pour son amie d'enfance et la tentation d'un mystérieux étranger. Tentant d'échapper aux fantômes de son passé, elle est emportée dans une maison qui respire, saigne et se souvient.Au lendemain d'une tragédie familiale, une auteure aspirant est déchirée entre l'amour pour son amie d'enfance et la tentation d'un mystérieux étranger. Tentant d'échapper aux fantômes de son passé, elle est emportée dans une maison qui respire, saigne et se souvient.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 7 victoires et 45 nominations au total
Avis à la une
Crimson Peak is a spooky movie about a woman (Edith) who falls in love with a mysterious man (Thomas) who is trying to restore his mining business. Thomas has a dilapidated family home which is sinking into his clay mine.
Plot- The start of the movie was its weakest point in my opinion. Thomas' appearance felt forced to begin with but in retrospect fitted with the story. I'm not a fan of lengthy time skips (few days or maybe a month) and the start of this movie had a few. This led to the romance between Thomas and Edith mostly happening offscreen and felt rushed. Once the characters arrived at Thomas' house (crimson peak) my enjoyment of the movie skyrocketed.
I personally thought that the plot was quite simple, which isn't necessarily a problem but I was left wanting to see more of the house and the characters could've been explored further, especially Thomas. There was a good explanation for the ghosts but it was done at the wrong time and this is my least favourite part of the movie and what I think is the weakest scene.
Cinematography- The way this movie looks is excellent. It's gorgeous. The only criticism I have is the weak CGI. It's not terrible, but I could tell it was CGI.
Length- I thought that it was an enjoyable length for me and it didn't outstay its welcome, just a shame it left me wanting more.
Immersion- For me, what went on was believable in the context of the movie (or depending on your beliefs regarding ghosts.) The time skips at the start hurt my ability to get really immersed, but I never looked at my watch.
Soundtrack- The music was fine and wasn't distracting. None of the tracks apart from the main theme really stood out to me.
Would I watch it again- Yes, I plan on watching it again.
6/10.
Sadly, there are some noticeable downsides. The most obvious one is how slowly this film starts, with seemingly very little happening for the first twenty or so minutes. The focus is very heavily on the plot, and while some characters are developed more slowly because it ties in with the plot, others can feel underdeveloped. When this is combined with the slow start, it makes the first part of this film fairly boring. Some of the chronology of this film can seem slightly strange as well, when scrutinised.
However, despite its faults, this is still a good film and worth watching. 7/10
But it might get a second life in the video circuit as people might still discover this very enjoyable movie. Big thumbs up for me!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThough the house was built in its entirety, it had to be torn down at the end of the shoot in order to make space in the studio.
- GaffesDr. Alan claims that it would be impossible to fake a ghost photograph with glass plates. In fact at the time a lot of 'ghost photos' were made with glass plates, because the expensive plates were re-used, and if not cleaned properly, a 'ghost' image would remain.
- Citations
Lucille Sharpe: But the horror... The horror was for love. The things we do for love like this are ugly, mad, full of sweat and regret. This love burns you and maims you and twists you inside out. It is a monstrous love and it makes monsters of us all.
- Crédits fousThe first half of the end credits reveals that Edith adapted her experience in the film into a book titled "Crimson Peak".
- Bandes originalesIn the Sails of Your Dreams
Written by Guillermo del Toro and Fernando Velázquez (as Fernando Velásquez)
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Crimson Peak?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- La cumbre escarlata
- Lieux de tournage
- Kingston, Ontario, Canada(Market Square Downtown outside city hall)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 55 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 31 090 320 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 13 143 310 $US
- 18 oct. 2015
- Montant brut mondial
- 74 679 822 $US
- Durée
- 1h 59min(119 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1