Orbitant une planète sur le pont de la guerre, des scientifiques font l'épreuve d'un engin afin de résoudre une crise d'énergie, mias finissent avec une réalité alternative très assombrieOrbitant une planète sur le pont de la guerre, des scientifiques font l'épreuve d'un engin afin de résoudre une crise d'énergie, mias finissent avec une réalité alternative très assombrieOrbitant une planète sur le pont de la guerre, des scientifiques font l'épreuve d'un engin afin de résoudre une crise d'énergie, mias finissent avec une réalité alternative très assombrie
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Ken Olin
- Radio Voice
- (voix)
Simon Pegg
- Radio Voice
- (voix)
Avis à la une
Well, about 30 minutes in and you realize why Paramount decided to release via Netflix.
I don't think anyone who loved cloverfield will be particularly taken by this film. And to those people who felt cloverfield lane was a bait and switch, they will really feel betrayed by this film.
The acting in this film is respectable. The effects, set and the like are fine. But the dull plot is not overcome by having a single character to care about.
I love sci-fi. I LOVE it. So I've seen dozens of these average forgettable sci-fi b-movies. With this one it looks like they followed some sort of "generic sci-fi b-movie checklist". Let's get to the point:
-Generic b-movie plot.
-Generic physics mambo jambo that makes no sense.
-Generic crew. Generic characters making obvious mistakes (I mean, if a magnet is strongly and dangerously attracting metal objects, would you get close to look at the magnet? or would you look behind you for metal objects coming through??)
-Generic "we move power from system A to system B and that would fix everything!" plans.
-Generic "ok, to fix this part of the ship, someone has to die... I'll sacrifice myself for you guys, go! save yourselves!" altruism moments.
-Almost no character development. They try SO HARD (failing) to make us care about the main character, that when a generic crew member dies, you just don't even care.
-Has almost nothing to do with Cloverfield. And the "explanation" of why cloverfield happened it's just bland... I wish Cloverfield's explanation would still be a mistery.
I really wanted to like this, I really did. I loved Cloverfield and even 10 Cloverfield Lane, but this is just a flop.
-Generic b-movie plot.
-Generic physics mambo jambo that makes no sense.
-Generic crew. Generic characters making obvious mistakes (I mean, if a magnet is strongly and dangerously attracting metal objects, would you get close to look at the magnet? or would you look behind you for metal objects coming through??)
-Generic "we move power from system A to system B and that would fix everything!" plans.
-Generic "ok, to fix this part of the ship, someone has to die... I'll sacrifice myself for you guys, go! save yourselves!" altruism moments.
-Almost no character development. They try SO HARD (failing) to make us care about the main character, that when a generic crew member dies, you just don't even care.
-Has almost nothing to do with Cloverfield. And the "explanation" of why cloverfield happened it's just bland... I wish Cloverfield's explanation would still be a mistery.
I really wanted to like this, I really did. I loved Cloverfield and even 10 Cloverfield Lane, but this is just a flop.
I really enjoyed it, so I really don't get the hate.
I genuinely think it's a pretty good space flick, it may just be the fact that is has the word "Cloverfield" in it or that it is attached to that universe as to why it gets so much hate.
Pretty freaky, I wouldn't say scary, maybe 1 or 2 jump scares, even a few laugh out loud moments 'cause of your man from the 'I. T crowd' and it looks brilliant, great effects and visuals I have to say.
There's a lot of grey areas with the characters, the heels aren't even full on heels, which is what I like. It also has a feel good feel to it, or does it? You'll have to find out...
To me it felt a lot like Cube/Cube 2 (first one is defo worth a watch BTW) as I just kept waiting for the next weird and crazy thing to happen and wasn't disappointed.
Honestly don't be put off by the reviews or score I honestly think if this was called something different it wouldn't catch all the hate.
It's an better than an above average sci-fi film, it's a good sci-fi film. Gutted we haven't seen some sort of equal or another installment in the CCU.
So anyway, give it a try for yourself, you've already got the streaming service, so it's free, may as well!
I genuinely think it's a pretty good space flick, it may just be the fact that is has the word "Cloverfield" in it or that it is attached to that universe as to why it gets so much hate.
Pretty freaky, I wouldn't say scary, maybe 1 or 2 jump scares, even a few laugh out loud moments 'cause of your man from the 'I. T crowd' and it looks brilliant, great effects and visuals I have to say.
There's a lot of grey areas with the characters, the heels aren't even full on heels, which is what I like. It also has a feel good feel to it, or does it? You'll have to find out...
To me it felt a lot like Cube/Cube 2 (first one is defo worth a watch BTW) as I just kept waiting for the next weird and crazy thing to happen and wasn't disappointed.
Honestly don't be put off by the reviews or score I honestly think if this was called something different it wouldn't catch all the hate.
It's an better than an above average sci-fi film, it's a good sci-fi film. Gutted we haven't seen some sort of equal or another installment in the CCU.
So anyway, give it a try for yourself, you've already got the streaming service, so it's free, may as well!
Nonsensical utter garbage in space. The people behind this story should be forbidden to go near a keyboard because a plot like this is borderline criminal.
I wasn't expecting much from The Cloverfield Paradox, so I was pleasantly surprised when it ended up delivering a pretty satisfying movie.
The tie in to the Cloverfield universe was a little thin, and after reading how the movie came to be, I understand.
Don't go in to the movie expecting to hate it because other people did. Just enjoy it for it for what it is.
The tie in to the Cloverfield universe was a little thin, and after reading how the movie came to be, I understand.
Don't go in to the movie expecting to hate it because other people did. Just enjoy it for it for what it is.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesA surprise trailer was dropped during Super Bowl LII on 4 February 2018, advertising the movie's final title and its release on Netflix. The release occurred immediately after the game, with the film drawing in five million viewers in its first seven days.
- GaffesA hull breach would not cause an entire room filled with water to freeze instantly. Water exposed to the vacuum of space would boil due to the lack of pressure.
- Versions alternativesWhen the movie premiered on Netflix, the Netflix logo appeared before the Bad Robot logo at the start of the film. When the movie was released on DVD and Blu-Ray by Paramount Pictures, the Netflix logo was replaced by the Paramount logo which still runs before the Bad Robot logo.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: The Cloverfield Paradox and the Netflix Conundrum (2018)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Cloverfield Paradox?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- God Particle
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 45 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 42min(102 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant