The British

I am only half way through watching the first episode of the Hollywood/Disney-fied version of British History and find it appalling and disgusting. Have they had a 'Single' Historian on the programme? NO! Have they had loads of actors and actresses who are 'known' in USA on - YES. Do these people KNOW anything of British History HFNO!

Not a single person on the programme has read Tacitus or reviewed the historical archaeological evidence? NO

Showing WHITE 'North' European looking Romans invading Britain in 56AD... The romans and all people's of the Med. Sea region of that era were black as the ace of spades! IF they had read Tacitus and the records of the Roman Empire, they would know the reason for the invasion was the 'Angelic' look of the peoples, strong - sturdy - white or red hair, with Pale complexions, that fetched the highest price on in the Roman Slave Auctions!! The invasion was about MONEY! Not about land, Southern France and Egypt were the bread baskets... the 'midge' infested North! Why do people of Italy have blue eye's today, the slaves that were paid in tribute 'post-Budica'! I could tell it was tripe when they said it was 10,000 Romans who invaded Britain, it was 5 legions of 25,000 (per legion) just to 'impose' their military might and take slaves from the southern half of Britain. This programme is total fantasy and it should either never have been made or the producers should have consulted REAL HISTORIANS. I shall NOT be watching the rest of this Tripe as it can only get worse and there is far too much of 'bash the British' attitude in a few nations of the world.

Though well produced this series should have been called the English. Complete lack of info outside of England full stop, quite disappointing really.

Its a starter , nothing more, is it The History of The British ? No, is it a a gateway into the History of This Great Land, good and bad ? Yes. Use it. I have just watched the episode about the Black Death, I live near Tichfield, the village mentioned in the series, I watched it. Went on line, and am now reading an in depth account of the period written by The Bishop of Winchester.

Its a TV programme for the modern viewer, not The World at War.

The special effects are fine, the re-enactments are fine. But when interviewing people, they have only 2 or 3 historians in episode 1, and the rest is a bunch of random actors, broadcasters and other such people without any credentials to talk about history.

They also cherry-picked events arbitrarily. How come they have an episode about the celts and the romans and forget all about Caesar and Boudicca? Episode 1 covers the 400 years or so of roman ocupation, and then episode 2 brushes through saxon times, the viking age and the normans, so in episode 3 they can talk about Tudors.

I mean, come on! This is just being lazy. There's a massive amount of history in there and they just couldn't be bothered. It had a lot of wasted potential. Pity.

As entertainment the series are okay. Well known actors, football players, newsmen and others all able to read the script rather well.

But as a documentary is it appalling.. it's subjective, self-tasting and romantic.

As a historical document it is worthless, and as propagandistic patriotic romance it is too obvious to be powerful.

It neglects facts, it seems the purpose is to show the Brits were first and best with everything.

As an example, whereas facts tell us that Gutenberg was the man behind the spreading of the 'idea of printing' all across Europe, it is said here that William Caxton did so..

He DID bring the first press to England more than 3 decades after Gutenberg's Bible had been printed. To compare printing to be AS important as the internet is alright and true, but then to take credit for spreading the printed word, reminds me of Al Gore claiming he "invented" the internet.

The reenactment scenes and 3D effects in the virtual illustrations are immaculate, and all that brings a positive note to this disaster of a show.

Several times the pundits claim, "Britain was the original nation of entrepreneurs, the original nation of inventors" which obviously are not true and very self-tasting.

verdict: obnoxious