Lizzie Borden's Revenge

When you think of all the up and coming film makers who would jump at the opportunity to get funding to make a movie you have to ask yourself why this piece of nonsense ever got made. As previous reviewers have said it has all the acting,directing and content quality of a 70's porn movie without the porn! It's hard to imagine that the people involved in producing this film sat around looking at the days shooting and thinking " this is good". Just the first few minutes sets the tone of the rest of the movie. Who did they get to play Mr. Borden?...a friend who fancied being in a movie?....the pizza delivery guy who had a spare few minutes? Total rubbish..if you love films avoid at all costs.

This is a good nudity film with some live tits and ass. The girls look good, and the soft core scenes are nice. The acting is decent, what you would expect from a low budget soft core movie. The suspense is good, I was surprised quite a few times. The Lizzie Borden relative part of the plot is new, and added an interesting twist to the movie. Also, the half insane sister was cryptic and cute. There was a bit of gore, but nothing too stomach turning. All in all this was a nice film with good looking naked girls having fun with a bit of supernatural horror and suspense added in to make it an interesting plot. Not grade A block buster, but a fun movie to watch for some laughs, scares, and hot chick watching.

No more words are needed. I've added this sentence as my review was too short.

Ah, yes. Dennis Devine.

To paraphrase Withnail, I watched this movie by mistake on YouTube, on a tablet, while waiting for a delayed flight.

As someone else asked: why?

As in: why are such movies made? Who bankrolls 'em? Do they make any money? What is the unseen, unknown part of the equation here? I do not see it, I certainly do not know it...

To me, this movie seems like something a bunch of (probably drunk) friends could have come together to make using an iPhone camera - as a joke. You know, as something they'd later show to other friends - as a joke.

But it ain't that. It's an actual movie production (such as it is). And I don't get it. Is it - specifically - made for people who watch movies whilst drunk or stoned? Is there a whole, separate market (demography) for such movies that I'm not aware of? But - if so - er...WHY (again)? Wouldn't it be cheaper and more sustainable for everyone involved if that demography just watched random YouTube clips of - I don't know - fat dudes on trampolines, cats slapping unaware dogs, soccer players accidentally getting kicked in the nuts, and so on?

How are movies like this a part of the movie industry in the post-Internet era? (I guess that's what I'm asking).

Fascinating phenomenon.

Unless it's softcore porn, excessive nudity of beautiful young women for no reason really doesn't have any business being in a movie categorized as horror. The difference with movies like Friday the 13th or Halloween is that the sex and nudity is symbolic to breaking sexual abstinence, the killer is the punishment for that. This movie was just replete with shameless nudity in a non-porn genre to the point that it almost could be classified as porn. On top of that, the movie looks cheap, the gore effects are terrible, and the acting is god awful. It's as if the director just rounded up the most attractive women who were willing to get naked for him on camera. What a hunk of crap.

F