NOTE IMDb
5,9/10
1,6 k
MA NOTE
Une famille américaine emménage à Canterville Chase, une imposante maison de campagne hantée depuis 300 ans par le fantôme de Sir Simon De Canterville.Une famille américaine emménage à Canterville Chase, une imposante maison de campagne hantée depuis 300 ans par le fantôme de Sir Simon De Canterville.Une famille américaine emménage à Canterville Chase, une imposante maison de campagne hantée depuis 300 ans par le fantôme de Sir Simon De Canterville.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Hugh Laurie
- Mephisto Monster
- (voix)
- …
Emily Carey
- Virginia Otis
- (voix)
Meera Syal
- Lucretia Otis
- (voix)
David Harewood
- Hiram Otis
- (voix)
Jakey Schiff
- Louis Otis
- (voix)
Bennett Miller
- Kent Otis
- (voix)
Bill Lobley
- Lord Monroe
- (voix)
Giles New
- The Colonel
- (voix)
- …
Lynne Seymour
- Mrs. Borsakov
- (voix)
- …
Avis à la une
I underestimated the movie at first but after watching it a enjoyed it a lot
Now to the main review.
I Enjoy the movie a lot,it is well made and has an interesting plot It has what you expect from movies,scenes that make you cry,laugh or any other emotion, i also like how its not scary so kids can watch it without parents worrying about their children being scared.
I think, is a movie that is fun for the whole family. Youngsters will like the characters, the older children will enjoy the plot, and the adults will likely enjoy the movie as.
I don't feel any horror. It's a very good movie for family,kids and youngsters.
Now to the main review.
I Enjoy the movie a lot,it is well made and has an interesting plot It has what you expect from movies,scenes that make you cry,laugh or any other emotion, i also like how its not scary so kids can watch it without parents worrying about their children being scared.
I think, is a movie that is fun for the whole family. Youngsters will like the characters, the older children will enjoy the plot, and the adults will likely enjoy the movie as.
I don't feel any horror. It's a very good movie for family,kids and youngsters.
1. There's nothing interesting about the choppy animation, in fact it's worse than 2000's animation movies somehow, wich makes this kinda boring to watch.
2. The plotline in most cases is completely unrealistic, making this movie even more unwatchable.
3. The scenes that try to make you laugh, cry or make you feel anything else fail miserably, with the dialogues being exaggerated, bland,or useless, 90% of the sounds effect in the movie just being:"huh?""woah" or any kind of overused interjections.
4. The characters dont have a lot of developement, making them very boring and uninteresting.
5. Why is half the cast morbidly obese?? Seriously,barely anyone was obese in the 20th century.
Overall this movie wasn't funny, interesting or scary at all, and i don't even know what it's supposed to be.
2. The plotline in most cases is completely unrealistic, making this movie even more unwatchable.
3. The scenes that try to make you laugh, cry or make you feel anything else fail miserably, with the dialogues being exaggerated, bland,or useless, 90% of the sounds effect in the movie just being:"huh?""woah" or any kind of overused interjections.
4. The characters dont have a lot of developement, making them very boring and uninteresting.
5. Why is half the cast morbidly obese?? Seriously,barely anyone was obese in the 20th century.
Overall this movie wasn't funny, interesting or scary at all, and i don't even know what it's supposed to be.
Man, it was such a Magnificent Film, from Start to Finish.
Granted, the Source Material is of Oscar Wilde.
But you still have to Execute.
Elements -
1. Again the Filmmakers already have the Upper Hand with Such Material as this Particular Oscar Wilde Story but the Effective Execution was also There.
2. The Dialogue was Excellent, Forwarding the Plotline Consistently. A Few Good Quips too. "Somehow Cucumber Sandwiches are a Thing, But I don't know why" - or something along those lines, It was Funny to me.
3. The Animation Style, I love this Style. It's Nothing Out of this World, but it had this Charm that Suited this Particular Story.
4. Virginia Otis is Great, she has the Charisma to Lead this thing. Canterville was Ok. And the Rest of the Supporting Cast were Good too.
5. It Hits the Emotional Beats Well.
Overall, Excellent Narrative Storytelling, Great Dialogue, Emotional Beats, it was just a Delightful Watch.
Granted, the Source Material is of Oscar Wilde.
But you still have to Execute.
Elements -
1. Again the Filmmakers already have the Upper Hand with Such Material as this Particular Oscar Wilde Story but the Effective Execution was also There.
2. The Dialogue was Excellent, Forwarding the Plotline Consistently. A Few Good Quips too. "Somehow Cucumber Sandwiches are a Thing, But I don't know why" - or something along those lines, It was Funny to me.
3. The Animation Style, I love this Style. It's Nothing Out of this World, but it had this Charm that Suited this Particular Story.
4. Virginia Otis is Great, she has the Charisma to Lead this thing. Canterville was Ok. And the Rest of the Supporting Cast were Good too.
5. It Hits the Emotional Beats Well.
Overall, Excellent Narrative Storytelling, Great Dialogue, Emotional Beats, it was just a Delightful Watch.
If you like to see a good adaptation of this family Oscar Wilde story best to watch 1944 Jules Dassin version still the best.
In this animation version they have changed the characters to be more socially correct as per Hollywood standards, at the cost of entertainment and a good family time. It is sad that one can not enjoy a simple 2 hours of an old story in form of a new movie these days without being exposed by the legion of revisionist that have to ruin every story to suit their social view. The movie has no likable characters, its not funny. Avoid this and go back to the older versions. Best one is 1944 version mentioned above.
Summary: Terrible adaptation 2 dimensional and not likable.
In this animation version they have changed the characters to be more socially correct as per Hollywood standards, at the cost of entertainment and a good family time. It is sad that one can not enjoy a simple 2 hours of an old story in form of a new movie these days without being exposed by the legion of revisionist that have to ruin every story to suit their social view. The movie has no likable characters, its not funny. Avoid this and go back to the older versions. Best one is 1944 version mentioned above.
Summary: Terrible adaptation 2 dimensional and not likable.
The animation evokes the aesthetics of early 2000s video games, but not in a way that adds nostalgic value. Rather, it appears as if constrained by the same limitations that plagued those older games-resulting in choppy and disjointed visuals. A reviewer's perfect 10 out of 10 score for the film raises further concerns. This suspicion is heightened by the fact that the review was published a month before the film's official release. Such an anomalously high rating strongly suggests a self-serving agenda, likely from someone affiliated with the production team. Despite a compelling story, the film ultimately fails to deliver a visual experience that matches the quality of its narrative.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesStephen Fry (Sir Simon de Canterville) previously played Oscar Wilde, the author of the short story on which the film is based, in Oscar Wilde (1997).
- GaffesIt's clear from his gravestone that Sir Simon lived and died during the seventeenth century. His ghost, however, is dressed in sixteenth century style.
- Citations
[repeated line]
Louis Otis, Kent Otis: [pointing to each other] It Was Him
- Crédits fousAfter the credits there is a sound of something breaking followed by the Otis Twins blaming the ghost until it's pointed out their home is no longer haunted leading them to blame each other
- ConnexionsFeatured in The 7PM Project: Épisode datant du 12 janvier 2024 (2024)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Canterville Ghost?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Canterville Ghost
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 192 310 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 150 041 $US
- 22 oct. 2023
- Montant brut mondial
- 3 874 170 $US
- Durée1 heure 29 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Italian language plot outline for Le fantôme de Canterville (2023)?
Répondre