NOTE IMDb
2,4/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhen a super cyclone threatens the entire American western seaboard, a lone meteorologist and a petroleum engineer must battle the elements to stop the threat.When a super cyclone threatens the entire American western seaboard, a lone meteorologist and a petroleum engineer must battle the elements to stop the threat.When a super cyclone threatens the entire American western seaboard, a lone meteorologist and a petroleum engineer must battle the elements to stop the threat.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Ming-Na Wen
- Dr. Jenna Sparks
- (as Ming-Na)
Avis à la une
bad acting,terrible special effects, how convenient to be sucked up in a tornado and land nicely on four wheels then get out and have beautiful weather , or having wind and oil( I thought they struck lava) on the windshield and noticing that the vegetation was still and serene. The same on the rig were all hell breaks loose, explosions,fire,lava, etc... but in the cabin, nothing was happening and seeing the camera going in circles around the people who cannot decide what to do next and outside, it was sunny and no smoke, in another sequence, you see them hosing on the ground in front of the fire! like they inserted clips from somewhere else and the list goes on and on, I just cannot find what made sense during the film apart from the actors earning a living, good for them ! the whole film was clips inserted here and there from someplace else and no efforts done to make the special effects more believable, I was left with the impression that all they wanted is to get the film out the quickest possible without reviewing anything to make a quick buck on the least possible effort, that's what you get when that happens, I was very deceived
Please make it stop... So bad... So stupid... Can't... process... the badness... Noooooooo!
I wish the 10 lines requirement was not in place because this movie is so bad that 10 lines are completely unnecessary. I would have to pad this with a lot of redundant adjectives. Any further commentary would suggest a level of depth that simply is not there.
I figure a 12 year old with a video camera could come up with a movie half as good as this. That's right, this movie is on par with what a 12 year old could come up with. And not even a talented 12 year old.
Should be required viewing in film schools on how NOT to make a movie.
Yes really, that bad.
10 lines yet?
I wish the 10 lines requirement was not in place because this movie is so bad that 10 lines are completely unnecessary. I would have to pad this with a lot of redundant adjectives. Any further commentary would suggest a level of depth that simply is not there.
I figure a 12 year old with a video camera could come up with a movie half as good as this. That's right, this movie is on par with what a 12 year old could come up with. And not even a talented 12 year old.
Should be required viewing in film schools on how NOT to make a movie.
Yes really, that bad.
10 lines yet?
I am only 21 minutes into this movie and already there are more holes than pound of Swiss cheese. For instance: A massive storm, the boat is rocking all over the place, people scrambling for cover, big waves, the whole nine yards. One man falls over board into a perfectly calm, what resembles a black bottom swimming pool. Later they're in the kitchen of the boat - everything on the shelves and counters are in perfect order, like they've not been touched at all. Not too mention, the sky is black, thunder crashing, winds blowing and yet strangely on the deck of the ship, the sun is shining and there is no sign of even a mild breeze anywhere. And the acting - WHERE do they get these people that play in these horrible, boring, ridiculous, so called disaster movies.
I really thought this would be the best bad disaster movie because it starred 2 people I have actually heard of before. Then the 3rd name in the opening credits was the make-up artist, that's a huge red flag. The one unique thing about this mess is that there's no crooked oil man that caused the disaster. Just an oil man who had no idea what he was doing and a scientist named Jenna that can choke out a Marine. This is just bad all around.
The combination of bad acting and even worse effects made me laugh so hard I started having ab spasms. The only person I even recognized was the dude who played Brucie in the Adam Sandler version of The Longest yard, and while it was his time to shine as a major character, he didn't. I guess he shouldn't have had that popcorn. It's at least entertaining in how bad it is. I'd put it in the same category of the Sharknado movies. As long as you go into it knowing it's gonna be bad, you can at least milk it for a couple ounces of entertainment value, if you're like me and have a good time pointing out the terrible effects, terrible acting and gaping plot holes. My wife and I had fun making fun of this movie.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAbout 28 minutes into the movie, the radar shows a map of southern Florida, even though the cyclone is on the west coast, nearing Los Angeles as stated in the movie several times. This is a factual error.
- GaffesDuring a sequence of shots around the 53-minute mark showing the cyclone hitting California, there is a shot of two vehicles with Japanese plates, one of which is driving on the left. Also, a white road sign with blue writing in Japanese and Roman characters indicates a destination.
- Citations
Dr. Jenna Sparks: We may be able to use my nano-tech research to save us from the storm.
- Bandes originalesComing Down To The Wire
Written, produced and performed by Mark E. Young
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 2 £GB (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 29min(89 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant