Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA director prepares a remake of an old Russian noir film. The lead actress becomes obsessed with the Russian model for her character. An eerie madness ensues that turns the making of the rem... Tout lireA director prepares a remake of an old Russian noir film. The lead actress becomes obsessed with the Russian model for her character. An eerie madness ensues that turns the making of the remake into a suspense thriller in and of itself.A director prepares a remake of an old Russian noir film. The lead actress becomes obsessed with the Russian model for her character. An eerie madness ensues that turns the making of the remake into a suspense thriller in and of itself.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires au total
Beth Gondek
- Elizabeth Seitz
- (as Elizabeth Gondek)
Noah Lamanna
- Maelee Jacobi
- (as Courtney Lamanna)
Avis à la une
Film Noir is an entertaining action mystery that I really enjoyed. I was in to the story from the moment it began. I really enjoyed the premise of the film, a modern day story with a heavy dose of noir. actors give excellent performances as well, great job. I hope it is not last movie of Bruce Pittman. Waiting for your new work. The last movie it's an outstanding film that deserves and needs to be seen.It shows me Canadian films are not dead and buried but alive and vibrant.All in all, if you get a chance to see "the last movie", don't miss it.
This film gets an thumbs up from me.I find it sad that so many people are so narrow-minded that they will not watch a movie that is black and white or, in this case, is subtitled. I feel sorry for people who refuse to watch a movie like The Last Movie. They have no idea what a beautifully acted and directed film this is, and they'll never know what an amazing experience they are missing.
This film gets an thumbs up from me.I find it sad that so many people are so narrow-minded that they will not watch a movie that is black and white or, in this case, is subtitled. I feel sorry for people who refuse to watch a movie like The Last Movie. They have no idea what a beautifully acted and directed film this is, and they'll never know what an amazing experience they are missing.
I was knocked out by the power of it, by the surprising way it builds and the turn it takes once Elizabeth Seitz comes on the scene. She is a fabulous actress and she completely captivated me.
I was reminded of The Black Swan, which exploits mental illness for its revulsion factor, Darren Aronofsky's forte. The Last Movie is not exploitative, but rather points a critical finger at the professional creative community who can easily push fragile creative minds over the edge. I know this happens. When Elizabeth says, "...or too much too late" we know things aren't going well. Bruce Pittman's performance as Nick Crawley the director of the remake, adds a comic layer. All his puffy-cheeked sighs and 'Oh-boys' and bad dreams give us a peek at the ordinariness of creative work. The producer's appearances via Skype are true-to-life and specific, so we don't just see the cliché money-man ruining the precious creative vision. I love the whole discussion of female actors' beauty vs talent. And all the juicy details about movie-making, like wardrobe and lighting tests – I eat that stuff up. I found Nick's wish to make high art while doing a low-budget commercial remake of a so-so foreign film acquired for virtually no money pretty rich. This feeling works perfectly with the fact that Elizabeth is pushed towards her edge in a fairly irresponsible way by this ambitious and cynical director. The scene where Nick records his thoughts on his career is really strong. It seeds that awful flashlight-under-the-chin hallucination of Nick's face, as seen in the trailer. I like all the sort of multimedia editing and the cutting-in of the documentary-in-the-making with all the echoes and computer screen treatments that a young documentarian would use. The way Pittman has mixed together the stylish noir photography of the Russian movie, the very current special-features doc look, and the straight realism of Elizabeth's story makes for a richly layered film that left me with lots to think about. It's one of those movies, like Shutter Island, that when you watch it the second time, it's like watching a whole different film.
I was reminded of The Black Swan, which exploits mental illness for its revulsion factor, Darren Aronofsky's forte. The Last Movie is not exploitative, but rather points a critical finger at the professional creative community who can easily push fragile creative minds over the edge. I know this happens. When Elizabeth says, "...or too much too late" we know things aren't going well. Bruce Pittman's performance as Nick Crawley the director of the remake, adds a comic layer. All his puffy-cheeked sighs and 'Oh-boys' and bad dreams give us a peek at the ordinariness of creative work. The producer's appearances via Skype are true-to-life and specific, so we don't just see the cliché money-man ruining the precious creative vision. I love the whole discussion of female actors' beauty vs talent. And all the juicy details about movie-making, like wardrobe and lighting tests – I eat that stuff up. I found Nick's wish to make high art while doing a low-budget commercial remake of a so-so foreign film acquired for virtually no money pretty rich. This feeling works perfectly with the fact that Elizabeth is pushed towards her edge in a fairly irresponsible way by this ambitious and cynical director. The scene where Nick records his thoughts on his career is really strong. It seeds that awful flashlight-under-the-chin hallucination of Nick's face, as seen in the trailer. I like all the sort of multimedia editing and the cutting-in of the documentary-in-the-making with all the echoes and computer screen treatments that a young documentarian would use. The way Pittman has mixed together the stylish noir photography of the Russian movie, the very current special-features doc look, and the straight realism of Elizabeth's story makes for a richly layered film that left me with lots to think about. It's one of those movies, like Shutter Island, that when you watch it the second time, it's like watching a whole different film.
I cannot understand all the other positive reviews. The movie was boring and seems like an exercise that some student had in a film school. This is a movie about movies and how they are made. The concept is not bad but the presentation was just boring. The pace is slow and not much is really happening most of the time, thought the acting was actually OK.
As the movie progresses it becomes more and more bizarre and I couldn't wait for it to end. I suspect that movie students and critics would love this movie but for all of the rest, you could probably pick a better one.
As the movie progresses it becomes more and more bizarre and I couldn't wait for it to end. I suspect that movie students and critics would love this movie but for all of the rest, you could probably pick a better one.
Other reviews were so praiseworthy, decided to check out this unknown title; now suspect other reviewers were somehow attached to the making of the film.
Acting is wooden, unnatural, and flat. Script is poor - suspenseful music for lines that lack power, sometimes expressed using blocky syntax.
Sound is poor quality.
Biggest problem is cinematography - presentation of unusual angles looks amateurish, since sometimes makes action difficult to follow. The editing is choppy, so changes in camera angles and scenes distracts from what is happening. Special effects look cheap and outdated.
If you don't care much about cinematography, you might still find this film worth watching; but for me, the combination of all these negatives makes it not worth finishing.
Acting is wooden, unnatural, and flat. Script is poor - suspenseful music for lines that lack power, sometimes expressed using blocky syntax.
Sound is poor quality.
Biggest problem is cinematography - presentation of unusual angles looks amateurish, since sometimes makes action difficult to follow. The editing is choppy, so changes in camera angles and scenes distracts from what is happening. Special effects look cheap and outdated.
If you don't care much about cinematography, you might still find this film worth watching; but for me, the combination of all these negatives makes it not worth finishing.
A very unique little movie – at once a truly believable black and white noir film; a wonderfully entertaining drama document on remaking the noir film and finally a nifty little horror film in the vein of Polanski's Repulsion. It sounds complicated, but all these pieces fit together seamlessly in a tight view of old movies and modern filmmaking. The photography and design of the film in total keeping with the genre and beautifully done. Beyond this, it is a terrific psychological study of madness. The performance by Elizabeth Gondek as the actress is a chilling portrayal of someone falling apart piece by piece. Kudos to the whole cast and writer-director Bruce Pittman. I can only hope this is not his last movie.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAward of Merit 2012 Lucerne International Film Festival.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 45 000 $CA (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 43min(103 min)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant