Devil's Men

I do not blame the director-role of Dave Bresnahan. Good job taking that seat.

But I guess there was no money to dig deeper and doctor the script?

Result of this:

Protagonist questions the sense of killing. I question my nausea while watching and why I don't just turn off a film instead of hoping something more will come.

No good action, no spark that ignites, nothing special about the devils.

Also, I have an FMJ déjà vu: First training, then combat deployment. The story remains boring, and the music is too heroic and loud. Also, later on, the characters remain dull and tedious.

I am too disappointed to research "Hollywood vs Fiction" and the real story behind it. Also it's a remake?

Devils men review

Coming fresh off the heels of a masterpiece like "Masters of the Air" I had high hopes for more, modern World War II content. By all accounts, "The Devil's Brigade - Die Spezialeinheit" should have been a winner: an elite unite, the First Special Service Force, going up against seemingly insurmountable odds in an area of the war that really hasn't gotten the attention it deserves.

However, despite some great editing, and passion on the part of the production crew and actors, the film feels disingenuous. Instead of taking audiences on a journey, showing them the horrors of war through the eyes of an Everyman, "Devil's Brigade" feels more like a version of war that the screenwriter thought it should be, instead of what it actually was. A sanitized version of events, instead of the true history that honors what these men and women went through.

Beyond that, the dialogue felt forced. It sounded like someone had watched "A Bridge Too Far", "Big Red One" or "Patton" and tried to cobble together the same speech patterns found in those classics, but instead, ended up with something more akin to a 1950s radio serial: canned, hokey, and unnatural.

Maybe "Devil's Brigade" will inspire viewers to look into the actual history and see what the real people did and experienced. I just wish it had been depicted in this film.

When I stumbled upon this 2023 war movie titled "Devil's Men" by random chance here in 2024, of course I opted to sit down and watch it, as I do like World War II themed movies. Howeer, I must admit that I wasn't exactly harboring much of any expectations to the movie, as it had managed to land a staggering 3.6 rating here on IMDb, when I sat down to watch it.

Sure, I had never heard about "Devil's Men" from writers Dave Bresnahan and Mark J. Nelson, so I didn't know what I was in for here. And as such, then they had every opportunity to entertain and impress me, I suppose.

I wasn't familiar with a single actor or actress on the cast list, and that is actually something I enjoy when I sit down and watch a movie; as there are no associations to other characters portrayed in other movies. The acting performances in "Devil's Men" were fairly okay.

Most of the skirmish scenes were lacking dynamic camera work in order to make it more adrenaline-filled and exiciting. It wasn't that it was badly filmed or anything, but the skirmish scenes were just too flat and one-dimensional, and that was a shame, because a war movie is so much more enjoyable if it feels like the audience is right there in the chaos of warfare. And it wasn't as if there wasn't enough skirmish scenes to pick from.

The wardrobe department and prop department definitely stepped up to their tasks and made it looks like an authentic World War II, and for a war movie that is a make or break deal. So thumbs up for accomplishing that.

The music in the movie was a bit too over-the-top. They simply used too much of that 'epic' atmospheric music throughout the course of the movie, and it was a bit too loud in comparison to the overall rest of the movie. A minor detail, but a nuissance nonetheless.

"Devil's Men" is a watchable World War II movie, though personally I could have used a bit more dynamic cinematography during the skirmish scenes. But all in all, a fair attempt at a World War II movie. If you enjoy World War II movies, you might get a particular kick out of watching directors Dave Bresnahan and Weston Childers' 2023 movie.

My rating of "Devil's Men" lands on a five out of ten stars.

This movie is supposedly made from the letters sent home by an actual soldier in WW2. They obviously had a very limited budget and couldn't afford a military advisor or historian. The costumes are so far from authentic US military uniform and insignia that I was completely distracted, but it got worse. The buildings, vehicles, ranks, weapons, tactics, terminology and even the locations are just wrong.

The sound and musical score are jarringly bad and the accents are pathetic. The dialog is poorly delivered and the acting is not great.

The story itself is reasonably good if you can get past everything wrong I've previously mentioned. I dare say this could've been a good movie if it had been made with any resemblance of a decent budget and an eye for historical accuracy.

I apologize in advance for my writing as English is a second language.

I was told by a couple acquaintances about the film Devil's Men (The German title translated to English is Devil's Brigade). As a student of the US/Canadian 1st Special Service Force, I was quite intrigued as this subject has not been broached by film since the rather abysmal film from the 1960s. I didn't have high expectations due to the rather cliché and gaudy poster that harkens more to stylish war films of yesteryear but due to my interest in the subject, I pressed on to watch it anyways.

This movie was far too long. I felt numerous times that the film was about to end only for it to continue another 15 minutes then to just tease me again. The acting wasn't terrible, though I wished I could have watched it without German dubbing since I prefer to watch films with their natural language with subtitles. It was full of cliches and honestly felt like it was a fever dream of what someone thought war was like if they only watched old war films from the 1960s. It was full of cliches like bootcamp scenes from Full Metal Jacket remade for children. I was shocked by the lack of real violence. What bothered me most was the portrayal of the German army as caricatures, just tools for the story rather than a formidable force that the 1st Special Service Force respected. They emphasized kids being in the ranks of the Heer when that didn't happen until far later in the war. It also portrayed them as quick to surrender and almost idiotic. In one scene, several US soldiers sneak up on Germans standing in the open and it didn't seem realistic at all. I realized the 1st Special Service Force were known to take prisoners and that they were feared by their German counterparts but it simply wasn't translated well in the movie because none of it seemed plausible the way it was written. Some of the areas they filmed looked like Europe but others didn't. The Monte La Difenza scenes look more like a desert rather than the mountain (I've actually visited the location as part of a historical paper for the University of Stuttgart). I didn't care for the love story, it felt too artificial and the actors didn't have much chemistry. The song midway through the movie also felt like it was added last minute and disjointed the feeling of the film. The last thing that I didn't like was the music that felt way too cheerful for the story. Those times were very dark days for us and the music felt like an overly patriotic understanding of what war is like.

The story of Sam intrigued me, however, and I learned that it was based on a true story and book. I was able to find a copy of the book and I had a chance to read it before I wrote this review. The book was very well done and it pains me to say that the film doesn't do it justice. Sam in the book was nothing like the Sam in the movie. Sam in the movie was very sad and mopey while the Sam in the book was far more jovial. I wish they would have taken more of his writings word for word from the book. It would have enhanced the experience overall. The writers really should have workshopped their work more to more accurately reflect what the book offered in terms of mood. As I said earlier, it's like a 1960s war movie in mood, not what war is actually like or what it does to people.

I hate tearing something down without providing some positives (something I've learned in academia). The filmmakers themselves did a rather good job with the videography. It felt slightly more professional than typical amateur productions. Also much care was given to the authenticity of uniforms, weapons, and equipment. They went as far as perfectly equipping the actors exactly how members of the 1st Special Service Force appeared which is no easy task as we have struggled with our museum to accurately portray these men. I was happy that real people were used as characters rather than fiction. If anything I'm very happy I watched this because it introduced me to Sam's book which hold a special place on my shelf.