Pandemonium
- 2023
- 1h 35min
NOTE IMDb
5,2/10
1,1 k
MA NOTE
Après avoir réalisé qu'il était mort sur le lieu d'un accident de voiture, Nathan descend dans les profondeurs de l'enfer, où il est condamné à éprouver la douleur des âmes torturées.Après avoir réalisé qu'il était mort sur le lieu d'un accident de voiture, Nathan descend dans les profondeurs de l'enfer, où il est condamné à éprouver la douleur des âmes torturées.Après avoir réalisé qu'il était mort sur le lieu d'un accident de voiture, Nathan descend dans les profondeurs de l'enfer, où il est condamné à éprouver la douleur des âmes torturées.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Avis à la une
I have to give the film credit for having a unique base setting to an anthology-based horror film.
There isn't much of a review here, since the film is flat and immensely mundane. It isn't terrible.
The CGI is kind of cheesy in the beginning, but nevertheless the demons and the films description of Hell are very "awesome" (for lack of better terminology).
Some of the stories are original, but are lacking in story depth, and they come off as mundane. I would categorize this film to be put into the supernatural horror genre, but that is just my opinion.
The stories themselves are not "scary" or "creepy/dark" as some may say but are intriguing in their own sort of way. On the contrary, the stories are quite boring.
I believe that the best aesthetic portions of the film are in the beginning and in "Hell." Otherwise, the film is rather mediocre.
I think it would be worth a one-time watch.
5/10.
There isn't much of a review here, since the film is flat and immensely mundane. It isn't terrible.
The CGI is kind of cheesy in the beginning, but nevertheless the demons and the films description of Hell are very "awesome" (for lack of better terminology).
Some of the stories are original, but are lacking in story depth, and they come off as mundane. I would categorize this film to be put into the supernatural horror genre, but that is just my opinion.
The stories themselves are not "scary" or "creepy/dark" as some may say but are intriguing in their own sort of way. On the contrary, the stories are quite boring.
I believe that the best aesthetic portions of the film are in the beginning and in "Hell." Otherwise, the film is rather mediocre.
I think it would be worth a one-time watch.
5/10.
Heaven and hell truly exist. You see a glimpse of the later one while watching this movie. And it's definitely the place where the writer/director will end up...
I rarely write reviews, but when having watched an extraordinary movies I make an exception every now and then. This is is such a time and the reason is clearly not positive. The movie earns its one star because of an idea of the afterlife it tries to present. But that's it. The resulting plot lacks a lot of logic (which the director tries to explain at first, but then gets weirder with every additional episode every passing minute). The missing visual effects (one CGI - I don't count the static doors in the landscape as such - and three latex face masks are not enough) and slow-acting actors with long-winding dialogues (and not describing anything despite it) give the movie the rest.
Maybe: if you watch it nevertheless, you could place this lost half and a hour of lifetime on your judgement day as good deed for self-abandonment...
Maybe: if you watch it nevertheless, you could place this lost half and a hour of lifetime on your judgement day as good deed for self-abandonment...
I'm not usually one to write reviews, but I felt like I had to for this movie. The script was really well done from start to finish. I wouldn't call it a horror movie because it had so many realistic elements; it felt more like a spiritual journey we hope never to experience ourselves. The music and sounds added a scary element to the whole movie. I had to rewatch a few scenes to get a clear picture of what was happening, and I didn't regret doing so. Even though the movie is French, it captivated me from beginning to end. It's definitely worth watching, and I'll leave it at that so you can be surprised too.
Pandemonium (2023, France), at face-value presents three ostensibly loose standing stories which all lead to almost everyone, fairly or unfairly, ending up in hell and going through a Dantesque process of suffering.
At this level the story engages questions around the moral values, if any, of those who "judge" humanity and as such the potential irrelevance of human existentialism.
There is also space for interpreting the film. An example of this flows mainly from the final aspect around the reincarnation of the Anti-Christ and the immediately preceding remarks around time being a human construct and not being linear. In each story we experience loss by the protagonist of family members in different ways, but there is always loss and there is always either direct or indirect guilt on the side of the protagonist. The argument for the stories thus dealing with reincarnation is not totally far-fetched and provides a solid thread to combine the stories into one larger story.
The cinematography was clearly influenced by writer and director Alexandre Claudin (Quarxx)'s artistic and atmospheric intent, inter alia demonstrated through the homage paid to various genres of horror films through the three stories.
The acting, especially by (at the time) ten year old Manon Maindevide, was top notch. The writing left obvious lacunae in the individual stories as well as the connecting story. Some might see this as a weakness in the film but it served an obvious purpose , both in relation to the main theme of existentialism / life-death-afterlife and the meaning (if any) thereof, as well as how the viewer gets his or her head around this theme, i.e. Through personal interpretation. Definitely a very unique film. 9/10.
At this level the story engages questions around the moral values, if any, of those who "judge" humanity and as such the potential irrelevance of human existentialism.
There is also space for interpreting the film. An example of this flows mainly from the final aspect around the reincarnation of the Anti-Christ and the immediately preceding remarks around time being a human construct and not being linear. In each story we experience loss by the protagonist of family members in different ways, but there is always loss and there is always either direct or indirect guilt on the side of the protagonist. The argument for the stories thus dealing with reincarnation is not totally far-fetched and provides a solid thread to combine the stories into one larger story.
The cinematography was clearly influenced by writer and director Alexandre Claudin (Quarxx)'s artistic and atmospheric intent, inter alia demonstrated through the homage paid to various genres of horror films through the three stories.
The acting, especially by (at the time) ten year old Manon Maindevide, was top notch. The writing left obvious lacunae in the individual stories as well as the connecting story. Some might see this as a weakness in the film but it served an obvious purpose , both in relation to the main theme of existentialism / life-death-afterlife and the meaning (if any) thereof, as well as how the viewer gets his or her head around this theme, i.e. Through personal interpretation. Definitely a very unique film. 9/10.
No pun intended - the movie has quite the bleak outlook on (most) things. And it is quite tough on a lot of things too. You may not agree with what the movie is trying to tell you. Especially because it sort of feels like it starts off slow and fun in a way ... but really does take quite a few twists and turns. It does not care of what you expect and if you are sensitive ... things do happen (as they tend to do in life, no fair or whatever).
Our main character goes on a journey ... and it seems to end one way or another ... but does it really. And does it in the end? The movie does not take the easy way out, that is for sure. It did remind me a bit of the Silent Hill movie (20 years old or something now?) ... not the story, but the mood this creates. And the visuals to a degree .. you have to suspend your disbelief ... and not be too sensitive as I already stated above ... then you might find quite a few interesting things here ... not judging morally one way or the other ... or at least you should try not to.
Our main character goes on a journey ... and it seems to end one way or another ... but does it really. And does it in the end? The movie does not take the easy way out, that is for sure. It did remind me a bit of the Silent Hill movie (20 years old or something now?) ... not the story, but the mood this creates. And the visuals to a degree .. you have to suspend your disbelief ... and not be too sensitive as I already stated above ... then you might find quite a few interesting things here ... not judging morally one way or the other ... or at least you should try not to.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Pandemonium?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Девятые врата: Пандемониум
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 41 843 $US
- Durée
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant