NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
2,7 k
MA NOTE
Après la mort de son grand-père, un homme se rend avec sa femme et ses enfants dans sa ville natale, où le chaos règne avec ses proches au sujet de l'héritage.Après la mort de son grand-père, un homme se rend avec sa femme et ses enfants dans sa ville natale, où le chaos règne avec ses proches au sujet de l'héritage.Après la mort de son grand-père, un homme se rend avec sa femme et ses enfants dans sa ville natale, où le chaos règne avec ses proches au sujet de l'héritage.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 14 nominations au total
Avis à la une
Behind all the false victimhood that Estrada programmed to promote his pamphlet, to generate morbidity and thus aspire to achieve what the war pamphlet TOP GUN: MAVERICK did achieve (get people back to the theaters), you will find the same Mexican devil, trying to make us believe that the PRI does not exist inside the 4T, and that Andrés - who was a civil servant in De la Madrid's term - and his disguised PRI/PAN/PRD dinosaur buddies are nothing but a purified miracle. When in fact the biggest achievement so far inside the 4T, is the economical experiment by PAN/MORENA's brilliant former Economy Secretary Tatiana Clouthier. The super peso and Gasoline controled price, prove the Economy's Evolution. Well, Estrada missed the opportunity to talk about this evolution, instead of making the same jokes that reinforce stereotypes.
So many years betting on those devils, has the consequence that the Estrada ritualistic chiles/churros have gone bad, and no longer fit in the Mexicans that survive south of the Rio Grande: us who resist going to the US as gardeners/domestic workers/nannies, or have already been there, done that; us who will not sell our property so the Real Estate Cartel + AIRBNB + the usual bad guys disguised as 4T purified products, have any profit on our watch; us who do not receive "maiceadas" from the US Embassy, or "remesas" from the Mojados, which have emboldened US Embassy agents AND Mojados alike to believe that they are the new owners of Mexico. Could that be the audience Estrada is talking to, so that they proceed granting their "maiceadas" and sending "remesas"? That would explain the disconnection between the audience and Estrada's latest pamphlet. Estrada's next movie could be the reaction to this movie, I bet it would be much more fun. But something tells me Estrada's sport is not about evolution. More than an Artist, he is an Artesano: 1 product with lots of copies. Just what happens in Politics vs. An Artist that makes every piece unique. The current president that Estrada/Alcázar have programmed the audience to love since they made LA LEY DE HERODES, doesn't believe in Cinema, but hey: it's all about the Economy, right? Estrada used to be the radiographist of Mexico, and now he needs to be transferred to the Postcard department.
In Estrada's favor, the jokes about the 4T ("para caer bien") are well thought. I suppose Estrada has already calculated the ever repeating program and when the day comes when he is asked of the scandals inside the 4T, he will be able to present its biggest achievement, which is to second the motion started by Violeta Nuñez, regarding Canada owning so much land (mining) that goes undeclared in maps.
But hey, it's just a movie and it is not a disaster that Estrada's postcards are no longer profitable. It does inspire folks to express themselves of the experience, so we feel proud of free speech: and as long as the films of Iñárritu/Del Toro/Franco/Cuarón continue evolving Cinema and earning prizes in international festivals, Estrada's reprogramming is for the birds.
So many years betting on those devils, has the consequence that the Estrada ritualistic chiles/churros have gone bad, and no longer fit in the Mexicans that survive south of the Rio Grande: us who resist going to the US as gardeners/domestic workers/nannies, or have already been there, done that; us who will not sell our property so the Real Estate Cartel + AIRBNB + the usual bad guys disguised as 4T purified products, have any profit on our watch; us who do not receive "maiceadas" from the US Embassy, or "remesas" from the Mojados, which have emboldened US Embassy agents AND Mojados alike to believe that they are the new owners of Mexico. Could that be the audience Estrada is talking to, so that they proceed granting their "maiceadas" and sending "remesas"? That would explain the disconnection between the audience and Estrada's latest pamphlet. Estrada's next movie could be the reaction to this movie, I bet it would be much more fun. But something tells me Estrada's sport is not about evolution. More than an Artist, he is an Artesano: 1 product with lots of copies. Just what happens in Politics vs. An Artist that makes every piece unique. The current president that Estrada/Alcázar have programmed the audience to love since they made LA LEY DE HERODES, doesn't believe in Cinema, but hey: it's all about the Economy, right? Estrada used to be the radiographist of Mexico, and now he needs to be transferred to the Postcard department.
In Estrada's favor, the jokes about the 4T ("para caer bien") are well thought. I suppose Estrada has already calculated the ever repeating program and when the day comes when he is asked of the scandals inside the 4T, he will be able to present its biggest achievement, which is to second the motion started by Violeta Nuñez, regarding Canada owning so much land (mining) that goes undeclared in maps.
But hey, it's just a movie and it is not a disaster that Estrada's postcards are no longer profitable. It does inspire folks to express themselves of the experience, so we feel proud of free speech: and as long as the films of Iñárritu/Del Toro/Franco/Cuarón continue evolving Cinema and earning prizes in international festivals, Estrada's reprogramming is for the birds.
Unfortunately it is a waste of time. 3 hours where only the first 40 minutes make you laugh slightly. From then on the movie is meaningless! The acting is good, the cast is good. But the script and direction are terrible. Of the things that bothered me the most were the stereotypes of the Mexican people, the stereotypes that Americans have about Mexico.
They were able to condense the idea, this movie should not last more than 70 minutes. There was no coherent plot, terribly tedious editing.
Don't waste your time watching it. There are better Mexican movies, please choose other film!
Thankyou for read.
They were able to condense the idea, this movie should not last more than 70 minutes. There was no coherent plot, terribly tedious editing.
Don't waste your time watching it. There are better Mexican movies, please choose other film!
Thankyou for read.
I understood the point of this movie's satire perfectly. And if you come from a small remote town in Mexico, you REALLY understand it.
So I applaud this film's producers for attempting to bring light to Mexico's underlying social problems. However, this film is very flawed.
For starters, 3 hours and 11 minutes is WAY too long for a comedic satire. Even TWO hours might have been way too long. So that right there was the film's major undoing.
The plot itself strikes me as odd (and yes, I fully know it is satire). The entire extended family in the small mining town is basically dirt poor. But the deceased grandfather is secretly filthy rich with who knows how many millions in gold and property. And he decides to leave it all to the one person in the family who needs it the LEAST?? I get that this is satire and it is meant as a subtle jab as to how poorly the country of Mexico manages its riches in reality. I get that. It still doesn't make sense. But I get that.
The only way I can make sense of this movie is that the producers used this film as a subtle way to say F YOU!! To Mexico's ignorant and selfish ways. They are trying to tell you that Mexicans only look out for themselves and no one else. And that's why Mexico is the way it is now.
It is grossly exaggerated. But there is SOME truth to that. For far too long, Mexico has failed to properly invest in itself because so many of their nation's richest people know that everyone else is just itching to take their money away at every turn. So instead of investing in the future of their country, they hoard it all for themselves instead.
So if that's what this film's message is, then I think I understood that part. But I didn't need 3 hours and 11 minutes of bland comedy to understand it.
So I applaud this film's producers for attempting to bring light to Mexico's underlying social problems. However, this film is very flawed.
For starters, 3 hours and 11 minutes is WAY too long for a comedic satire. Even TWO hours might have been way too long. So that right there was the film's major undoing.
The plot itself strikes me as odd (and yes, I fully know it is satire). The entire extended family in the small mining town is basically dirt poor. But the deceased grandfather is secretly filthy rich with who knows how many millions in gold and property. And he decides to leave it all to the one person in the family who needs it the LEAST?? I get that this is satire and it is meant as a subtle jab as to how poorly the country of Mexico manages its riches in reality. I get that. It still doesn't make sense. But I get that.
The only way I can make sense of this movie is that the producers used this film as a subtle way to say F YOU!! To Mexico's ignorant and selfish ways. They are trying to tell you that Mexicans only look out for themselves and no one else. And that's why Mexico is the way it is now.
It is grossly exaggerated. But there is SOME truth to that. For far too long, Mexico has failed to properly invest in itself because so many of their nation's richest people know that everyone else is just itching to take their money away at every turn. So instead of investing in the future of their country, they hoard it all for themselves instead.
So if that's what this film's message is, then I think I understood that part. But I didn't need 3 hours and 11 minutes of bland comedy to understand it.
The movie is a satire of the current discourse of mexican president who talks about fighting corruption and helping the poor people It won't attack the discourse, instead it will show you the real Mexico so you can judge if the discourse is true or not just as with other Luis Estrada movies.
The actors are second to none, Damian Alcazar portraying several characters displays why he is the current best mexican actor. While I was doubtful about Herrera and de la Reguera, now I understand they hired them because they portray a rich family, hence they are well suited for the role.
Great movie, the mexican president tried to censor the movie, and now it is using bots to give bad reviews.
The actors are second to none, Damian Alcazar portraying several characters displays why he is the current best mexican actor. While I was doubtful about Herrera and de la Reguera, now I understand they hired them because they portray a rich family, hence they are well suited for the role.
Great movie, the mexican president tried to censor the movie, and now it is using bots to give bad reviews.
I think the movie is really well done, with a great production and actors. Luis Estrada is amazing, but I was really dissatisfied with this film. Even though it is a sitcom, I really believe in the current times this kind of Mexican stereotypes do not exist anymore. This family and the town is not an actual current reality as it is shown. I am Mexican and I find this movie a little offensive and gives a wrong idea of what Mexico is. I think with the talent of Estrada, there was a big opportunity to show the best of our country and not always talk about the bad stuff. He has done politic criticism in previous films which I really feel greatful for, but this was not the case, this show social problems we have but not with tactical. I think there were things that where not really necessary to make people laugh. I don't mind the three hours, I mind the that is not congruent trying to show some reality but showing characteristics that I don't feel consistent. I do this review with all respect and open to hear opinions. I have plenty of examples to discuss about this film to support my review. Anyways I really wish success and that people don't carry this crazy idea about Mexico worldwide. We are much better that what it's shown in this movie.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesLupita mentions she's from San Pedro de los Saguaros, the same town in which "La ley de Herodes (1999)" is set.
- ConnexionsReferences Los tres huastecos (1948)
- Bandes originalesLas golondrinas
Performed by Brayan Martínez, Francisco Sánchez, Héctor Covarrubias, Iván Blanco, Martín de Jesús Saucedo, Juan Pablo Aguilera, Lorenzo Saucedo, Cristino Romo and Mauricio Hernández
Courtesy of Bandidos Films
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is ¡Que viva México!?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Çok Yaşa Meksika!
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 161 222 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 79 718 $US
- 26 mars 2023
- Montant brut mondial
- 4 218 942 $US
- Durée3 heures 11 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.0 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for ¡Que viva México! (2023)?
Répondre