The Bridge Curse: Ritual

I didn't realise that this was a sequel until I got to the end credits. I don't think I missed much in the first film and I don't think anyone will miss anything if you don't see this one. It really is a generic demon ghost zombie terrorising teeangers with an unimaginative story, unoriginal production design, forgettable music and sound design and worst of all a really unengaging cast. The acting is perfectly adequate but the characters are not interesting. The best bit about the film are the 'games' but there are only like 2 of these and a lot of filler. It's really not worth watching and not even good enough at being bad.

Having watched the 2020 horror movie "The Bridge Curse" and finding it to be mediocre, I can't really claim that I was particularly thrilled when I stumbled upon the 2023 sequel "The Bridge Curse: Ritual" here in 2024. But of course I opted to sit down and watch it, after all it was a horror movie that I hadn't already seen.

And who knows, maybe it would prove better than the first movie. So of course I opted to give director Lester Hsi's 2023 movie a fair chance.

Writers Keng-Ming Chang, Po-Hsiang Hao and Shih-Yuan Lu put together a script and storyline that felt like a heap of random scenes written and shot independently of one another, and then handed over to director Lester Hsi to put together and attempt to make a coherent movie. It didn't really work out, because there was a horrifying lack of red thread throughout the course of the movie, and that made for a somewhat disjointed and boring viewing experience.

I wasn't familiar with the cast ensemble in the movie, but it should be said that the acting performances were actually fair. They had a good group of actors and actresses put together to portray the various characters in the movie.

And the title of the movie "The Bridge Curse: Ritual" just made zero sense when you look at the narrative and the contents of the script that the writers managed to concoct.

My rating of "The Bridge Curse: Ritual" lands on a three out of ten stars.

The Bridge Curse: Ritual: Taiwanese horror film. Set in 2019 this is more of a prequel rather than a remake. The bridge and it's angry ghosts feature but these are mostly in relation to one character. The action centres around the university's buildings and again is largely composed of found footage. In 2016 a student tries to beta test a Role Playing Game he is creating, to see if it will also arouse the interest of reputed ghosts. Things go horribly wrong as he is attacked by invisible forces and ends up in a coma. 2019, his sister along with other students try to finish creating his game. She beta rests it in the same building and despite being twice attacked, apparently by ghosts she is intent on continuing as are her student friends. Have this lot never watched a horror film? Some effective jump scares and convincing ghosts along with an in-between dimension which has to be traversed. Time slips are also involved. Things do get a bit confusing as the film chops back and forward betwixt the timelines. There are some very angry ghosts and warped Feng Shui at work here. A ten minute cut it's running time might have improved things as well, still it's worth watching. Directed by Lester Hsi, Writers Keng-Ming Chang, Po-Hsiang Hao and Shih-yuan Lu. On Netflix. 6/10.

After viewing the original I was shocked to see that this was touted as a remake and not a sequel and after enjoying the original I thought I would sit down and watch this remake.

So last night I settled in and watched.

Boy do I wish I didn't.

Firstly it barely had anything to do with the bridge from the original one, so why the same title?

The first 29 minutes were good and I was enjoying it but when they went to the library and did the four corners game, the film ruined itself. There were way to many special effects that ruined the tension of the movie.

If they had kept to the bare minimum of effects and kept the tension up then this would have been a really good film but no they went with substance over style and ruined the whole thing.

After that the film got worse and worse.

Okay the ending was good and screamed out for a sequel, if they do I hope that they go the way if the original and not the remake.

Overall very disappointing movie, stick to the original.

From the very beginning, it becomes painfully clear that this film is an exercise in frustration. The plot-or what passes for one-attempts to be complex and engaging but instead spirals into an incoherent mess that leaves the audience confused and irritated. It's like being strapped into a rollercoaster that never stops spinning, a ride you can't escape from no matter how much you want to. Every time you think the film might be on the verge of redeeming itself, it takes another wild turn into absurdity, leaving you more baffled than before.

One of the biggest problems with this film is its sheer lack of direction. The narrative is so disjointed that it's impossible to follow any semblance of a coherent storyline. Characters are introduced and discarded with little to no explanation, subplots are started and then abandoned without resolution, and the pacing is so erratic that you're never quite sure what's happening or why you should care. It's as if the filmmakers threw every idea they had into a blender, hit "puree," and served the resulting mess to the audience without any consideration for logic or structure.

The film also suffers from an identity crisis. It seems to be unsure of what it wants to be-a thriller? A drama? A psychological horror? It tries to be all these things at once but fails spectacularly in each attempt. The tonal shifts are jarring and poorly executed, making it impossible to invest in the story or the characters. One minute, the film is trying to be dark and edgy, and the next, it's attempting (and failing) to inject humor into the proceedings. The result is a muddled, confused mess that doesn't know what it's trying to say or why.

The characters are another major issue. They're poorly written, flat, and unlikable. Not one of them is relatable or worth rooting for, and their motivations are either unclear or nonsensical. Watching them stumble through the plot is like watching puppets with their strings tangled-it's a frustrating, cringe-worthy experience. The actors do their best with what they're given, but even the most talented performers would struggle to bring life to these one-dimensional characters.

Visually, the film is a nightmare. The cinematography is bland and uninspired, with scenes that are either too dark to see what's happening or so overexposed that they hurt your eyes. The special effects, if you can call them that, are laughably bad-more suited to a low-budget student film than a professional production. The editing is choppy and inconsistent, adding to the overall sense of disorientation and confusion. It's as if every aspect of the film was designed to be as unpleasant and disorienting as possible.