Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langue3 judges, Martin Short, Meahsa Brueggergosman and Stephen Moccio travel across Canada to find the countries best talent.3 judges, Martin Short, Meahsa Brueggergosman and Stephen Moccio travel across Canada to find the countries best talent.3 judges, Martin Short, Meahsa Brueggergosman and Stephen Moccio travel across Canada to find the countries best talent.
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
I have watched this since the start. I was so happy to watch so many talents get showcased. Wow - there were so many acts that amazed me. I even had to keep track of who I enjoyed each week and there were so many! Now it was time for the semi-final selections. I had my list of about 50 acts ready and I was cheering them on. Suddenly all these acts were interviewed and I had no idea who they were. Where were the ones I watched and enjoyed? Oh....they were eliminated! WHAT!
So out of the 36 acts that you want to show and promote Canada's Got Talent - are not worth watching or voting for. Why did you have to ruin a show that is an international winner!
I'm proud to be Canadian but I am disappointed in who they chose to promote my home and native land. They just had the second semi-finals show and I did not vote. There were no acts to vote for. If you read the online media you will see the votes are based on popularity - not talent.
Why did you take something and ruin it? Maybe you need better judges because these acts will not make Canadians proud. It will make us hide our heads in shame.
So out of the 36 acts that you want to show and promote Canada's Got Talent - are not worth watching or voting for. Why did you have to ruin a show that is an international winner!
I'm proud to be Canadian but I am disappointed in who they chose to promote my home and native land. They just had the second semi-finals show and I did not vote. There were no acts to vote for. If you read the online media you will see the votes are based on popularity - not talent.
Why did you take something and ruin it? Maybe you need better judges because these acts will not make Canadians proud. It will make us hide our heads in shame.
What a disservice to the talented acts. We rarely see an entire performance. Is this the producers fault? No one cares to consistently see the audience or judges' reaction while the acts are going on.
So many performances could have been riveting, especially the acrobatic, dance and thrill acts.
Perhaps the producers thought this was an artistic way to showcase our Canadian talent, but alas, fell very, very short.
I would have rated the show higher if I was to speak directly to the talent acts, but the way the camera captures the action loses all the impact.
This could have been so captivating, but instead comes off as irritating.
What a shame!
So many performances could have been riveting, especially the acrobatic, dance and thrill acts.
Perhaps the producers thought this was an artistic way to showcase our Canadian talent, but alas, fell very, very short.
I would have rated the show higher if I was to speak directly to the talent acts, but the way the camera captures the action loses all the impact.
This could have been so captivating, but instead comes off as irritating.
What a shame!
Trying to watch this show makes me dizzy? Whose idea is it to change camera angles every 1.5 seconds? This could be an enjoyable show with some great acts but it's impossible to enjoy with the million camera cuts. It's constantly changing angles in the act, and flicking back to the audience or judges. It should just show a front view of the act like the live audience would see. This is some of the worst editing/producing I have ever seen. Really disappointing when they are trying to showcase talent from Canada and it's so difficult to watch. I actually have to turn away from the tv because it makes me dizzy.
The host is annoying and the judges i dont find good because the acts are not good and can not compare to agt and there getting golden buzzerd when there not good.
CGT is a smaller, friendlier, and tamer spin off of its international counterparts.
Because Canada is a much smaller country than the U.S., the show will never get anywhere near the ratings that its American cousin gets. This means that the show must operate on a much smaller budget. Corners are cut in many obvious ways: The award for first place has a value of approximately $200,000, compared to $1 million for AGT.
Each episode is half the length of the American version: 1 hour for the performance episodes, and 30 minutes for the results show (compared to 2 hours and 1 hour respectively for AGT).
The show also must be much less accommodating for its contestants: They don't have the budget to fly in and put all their contestants in hotels. This means that there is no "judges round". Unlike the American version where contestants must perform, without an audience, in front of the three judges, in order to advance to the semifinals, contestants on the Canadian show make it to the semifinals based purely on the merit of their regional audition. Finally, only 36 contestants perform in the semifinal round (compared to 72 for the American version).
But let's get down to the most important aspect of this show: The quality of the performances. To put it quite simply, they suck. This isn't due to any lack of talent in Canada itself. The main culprit is a very poor and disorganized screening process for the show. The process of culling tens of thousands of auditions down to the best few dozen is a very difficult logistical task, and the producers of the show simply don't know how it's done.
One other very obvious difference with the Canadian version is in the judging. Many people say that the three judges (Stephan, Dina, and Martin) are much nicer than the judges on the American show. And they're right. After all, politeness is a quality that Canadians are very proud of. But here's the thing: That's not a good thing, that's a very bad thing, at least for people wanting to vegetate on their couch and be entertained for an hour on Sunday night.
To put it quite simply, Canada's Got Talent judges have demonstrated astonishingly low standards. Incredibly, they allowed nearly ninety (!) percent of all contestants through to the second round. However, they didn't do themselves or the contestants any favors by being this generous: The excess number of acts were simply culled after the audition round.
As anyone who watches AGT knows, there are many acts on CGT that got three emphatic "yes"es from the judges that would have received three very quick buzzes from the American judges. (Daddy Cool, anyone?) Maybe somebody should have told the three that they're hired as judges, not cheerleaders.
The host of the show, Measha Brueggergosman, seems to follow the same pattern. She cheers on virtually every contestant with almost mindless enthusiasm.
I guess it wouldn't be fair to roast the screeners, judges, and the host, without giving due criticism to the one other group that has shown terrible standards: The audience. They're just as culpable in cheering on and supporting the mediocrity.
What all of this adds up to is a talent show that has about the same caliber of talent as what you'd find in a high school gymnasium. It's quite apparent that the judges care much more about not hurting the feelings of the contestants than curing the boredom of their viewers. And the way the host pumps up and cheers on even the most talentless of contestants make the show far too often seem like a grade school talent show.
Canada's got talent, to be sure, but you will see almost none of it by watching this show.
Rating: 2 out of 10.
Because Canada is a much smaller country than the U.S., the show will never get anywhere near the ratings that its American cousin gets. This means that the show must operate on a much smaller budget. Corners are cut in many obvious ways: The award for first place has a value of approximately $200,000, compared to $1 million for AGT.
Each episode is half the length of the American version: 1 hour for the performance episodes, and 30 minutes for the results show (compared to 2 hours and 1 hour respectively for AGT).
The show also must be much less accommodating for its contestants: They don't have the budget to fly in and put all their contestants in hotels. This means that there is no "judges round". Unlike the American version where contestants must perform, without an audience, in front of the three judges, in order to advance to the semifinals, contestants on the Canadian show make it to the semifinals based purely on the merit of their regional audition. Finally, only 36 contestants perform in the semifinal round (compared to 72 for the American version).
But let's get down to the most important aspect of this show: The quality of the performances. To put it quite simply, they suck. This isn't due to any lack of talent in Canada itself. The main culprit is a very poor and disorganized screening process for the show. The process of culling tens of thousands of auditions down to the best few dozen is a very difficult logistical task, and the producers of the show simply don't know how it's done.
One other very obvious difference with the Canadian version is in the judging. Many people say that the three judges (Stephan, Dina, and Martin) are much nicer than the judges on the American show. And they're right. After all, politeness is a quality that Canadians are very proud of. But here's the thing: That's not a good thing, that's a very bad thing, at least for people wanting to vegetate on their couch and be entertained for an hour on Sunday night.
To put it quite simply, Canada's Got Talent judges have demonstrated astonishingly low standards. Incredibly, they allowed nearly ninety (!) percent of all contestants through to the second round. However, they didn't do themselves or the contestants any favors by being this generous: The excess number of acts were simply culled after the audition round.
As anyone who watches AGT knows, there are many acts on CGT that got three emphatic "yes"es from the judges that would have received three very quick buzzes from the American judges. (Daddy Cool, anyone?) Maybe somebody should have told the three that they're hired as judges, not cheerleaders.
The host of the show, Measha Brueggergosman, seems to follow the same pattern. She cheers on virtually every contestant with almost mindless enthusiasm.
I guess it wouldn't be fair to roast the screeners, judges, and the host, without giving due criticism to the one other group that has shown terrible standards: The audience. They're just as culpable in cheering on and supporting the mediocrity.
What all of this adds up to is a talent show that has about the same caliber of talent as what you'd find in a high school gymnasium. It's quite apparent that the judges care much more about not hurting the feelings of the contestants than curing the boredom of their viewers. And the way the host pumps up and cheers on even the most talentless of contestants make the show far too often seem like a grade school talent show.
Canada's got talent, to be sure, but you will see almost none of it by watching this show.
Rating: 2 out of 10.
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsVersion of America's Got Talent (2006)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Canada's Got Talent have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Canada's Got Talent (2012) officially released in India in English?
Répondre