Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn online stalker torments a young woman.An online stalker torments a young woman.An online stalker torments a young woman.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Peter Michael Dillon
- Detective Bonham
- (as Peter Dillon)
Avis à la une
Simple but mildly effective thriller starring Barton as a once carefree young woman stalked by a maniac for thirteen years, struggling to adjust to society whilst her tormentor remains on the loose. Whilst the game's up prematurely, it's still fun finding out how many of those close to Barton will suffer the consequences by association.
Whilst she's perhaps better known for her off-screen exploits, Barton knows how to act and she makes it look effortless as it should; she's timid as the character would be in the circumstances, but doesn't overact the part. Lea playing the dedicated detective is reliable in support, and there's a range of would-be suspects to entice the patient viewer, although the answer isn't especially well disguised, and waiting for a red herring which never appears is disappointing.
Low budget but appropriate for a telemovie, this Canadian thriller lacks logic but achieves its aim of a few cheap thrills and is elevated by Barton's balanced performance.
Whilst she's perhaps better known for her off-screen exploits, Barton knows how to act and she makes it look effortless as it should; she's timid as the character would be in the circumstances, but doesn't overact the part. Lea playing the dedicated detective is reliable in support, and there's a range of would-be suspects to entice the patient viewer, although the answer isn't especially well disguised, and waiting for a red herring which never appears is disappointing.
Low budget but appropriate for a telemovie, this Canadian thriller lacks logic but achieves its aim of a few cheap thrills and is elevated by Barton's balanced performance.
This is a terrible movie. I watch a lot of movies and this one has no real life base.
It's one thing to try and scare people into being careful, but it's another to totally shield the audience from reality.
The cinematography is totally horrible. I am still not sure what Lifetime Channel had hoped to achieve form this movie.
Even the leading actress is working half way - - at no point do we see her authentic self.
Was it the company? The production? or the writers?
I have no clue. But I feel like I want my dollar back from red-box (it was that bad).
It's one thing to try and scare people into being careful, but it's another to totally shield the audience from reality.
The cinematography is totally horrible. I am still not sure what Lifetime Channel had hoped to achieve form this movie.
Even the leading actress is working half way - - at no point do we see her authentic self.
Was it the company? The production? or the writers?
I have no clue. But I feel like I want my dollar back from red-box (it was that bad).
Literally the worst acting, and the fact it is so miscast made it even worse. Two stars instead of one since it was bad enough to made me right a review
I'm giving this 6 stars and even that's a little bit of a stretch. For a lifetime flick it had some bigger ticket actors and actresses. Wasn't the worst film of all time. I'd recommend if you have a lazy day and you're bored.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesWhen Dayton pulled up the files on his computer showing the personal information of both Paul Rogers and Detective John Bonham, the personal and business phone numbers in each file were exactly the same.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Cyberstalker?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 800 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 32min(92 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant