[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

S.O.S. Fantômes : La Menace de glace

Titre original : Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire
  • 2024
  • Tous publics
  • 1h 55min
NOTE IMDb
6,1/10
97 k
MA NOTE
POPULARITÉ
1 056
145
S.O.S. Fantômes : La Menace de glace (2024)
When the discovery of an ancient artifact unleashes an evil force, Ghostbusters new and old must join forces to protect their home and save the world from a second ice age.
Lire trailer1:08
6 Videos
99+ photos
Supernatural FantasyAdventureComedyFantasySci-Fi

Lorsque la découverte d'un ancien artefact libère une force maléfique, les anciens et les nouveaux S.O.S. Fantômes doivent unir leurs forces pour protéger leur maison et sauver le monde d'un... Tout lireLorsque la découverte d'un ancien artefact libère une force maléfique, les anciens et les nouveaux S.O.S. Fantômes doivent unir leurs forces pour protéger leur maison et sauver le monde d'une seconde ère glaciaire.Lorsque la découverte d'un ancien artefact libère une force maléfique, les anciens et les nouveaux S.O.S. Fantômes doivent unir leurs forces pour protéger leur maison et sauver le monde d'une seconde ère glaciaire.

  • Réalisation
    • Gil Kenan
  • Scénario
    • Gil Kenan
    • Jason Reitman
    • Ivan Reitman
  • Casting principal
    • Paul Rudd
    • Carrie Coon
    • Finn Wolfhard
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    6,1/10
    97 k
    MA NOTE
    POPULARITÉ
    1 056
    145
    • Réalisation
      • Gil Kenan
    • Scénario
      • Gil Kenan
      • Jason Reitman
      • Ivan Reitman
    • Casting principal
      • Paul Rudd
      • Carrie Coon
      • Finn Wolfhard
    • 742avis d'utilisateurs
    • 256avis des critiques
    • 46Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 8 nominations au total

    Vidéos6

    Final Trailer
    Trailer 1:08
    Final Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:33
    Official Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:33
    Official Trailer
    Official Teaser Trailer
    Trailer 2:00
    Official Teaser Trailer
    'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Fan Q&A
    Clip 4:04
    'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' Fan Q&A
    All About Horror in 2024
    Clip 5:57
    All About Horror in 2024
    Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire: Scary Ghosts (Australia)
    Featurette 0:38
    Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire: Scary Ghosts (Australia)

    Photos283

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 278
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux73

    Modifier
    Paul Rudd
    Paul Rudd
    • Gary Grooberson
    Carrie Coon
    Carrie Coon
    • Callie Spengler
    Finn Wolfhard
    Finn Wolfhard
    • Trevor Spengler
    Mckenna Grace
    Mckenna Grace
    • Phoebe Spengler
    Kumail Nanjiani
    Kumail Nanjiani
    • Nadeem
    Patton Oswalt
    Patton Oswalt
    • Dr. Hubert Wartzki
    Celeste O'Connor
    Celeste O'Connor
    • Lucky
    Logan Kim
    Logan Kim
    • Podcast
    Emily Alyn Lind
    Emily Alyn Lind
    • Melody
    James Acaster
    James Acaster
    • Lars
    Bill Murray
    Bill Murray
    • Peter Venkman
    Dan Aykroyd
    Dan Aykroyd
    • Ray Stantz
    Ernie Hudson
    Ernie Hudson
    • Winston Zeddemore
    Annie Potts
    Annie Potts
    • Janine Melnitz
    William Atherton
    William Atherton
    • Mayor Walter Peck
    Shelley Williams
    Shelley Williams
    • Senior Advisor
    Chris Tummings
    Chris Tummings
    • Police Chief
    John Rothman
    John Rothman
    • Library Administrator
    • Réalisation
      • Gil Kenan
    • Scénario
      • Gil Kenan
      • Jason Reitman
      • Ivan Reitman
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs742

    6,196.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    5Meaningless_Signifier

    A triumph in generic corporate film-making and nostalgia bait.

    This film is the epitome of okay. It relies on a fairly bland, standard plot with tepid, generation spanning humor. It's an offensively inoffensive product, which takes few risks while attempting to cater to a generic corporate vision of the 'standard audience'.

    Most of the performances are adequate. It includes a large and diverse cast of all your favorite new, forgettable characters, played by actors from better films.

    Perhaps most importantly, the film overflows with member berries and nostalgia bait for product craving consumers of all ages and backgrounds.

    And in a financial sense, the corporate entities and creators behind the film were moderately successful, earning over $200 million dollars on a film with a $100 million dollar budget. Truly, a triumph in generic corporate film-making.
    6KrissKross_CB

    Tried to fit in too much and ran out of steam

    Huge fan of the first few original movies. They were good and didn't try too hard. Focused on the main characters and the ghosts even had something enjoyable about them.

    But it seems these days Ghostbusters has fallen victim of trying too hard and making a connection with everybody by introducing all these extra characters with their own backstory. The ghosts just become a pawn piece and aren't really the focal point. So much promise in the first half hour, but then more new characters, more side stories, lots of one liners, and then...a quick wrap up and credits roll. Snore. Don't waste your $
    6Fields201

    I struggled to love it

    I saw this film twice because I wanted to see it with my Ghostbusters fan friend and see if this film got better with my second viewing. I seriously wanted to love this movie. The TV spots and trailers looked awesome. This had to be the best Ghostbusters sequel yet! Nope. In fact, this might be the worst.

    There's a great Ghostbusters film in this movie. There really is but studio meddling hurt the film. My first time viewing it, I walked out of the film feeling like I just got out of work. Throughout most of the film I struggled to care about anything going on and I was drained. When the actual Ghostbusters show up, I perked up a little bit. However, I should be loving this. All that stuff at the library should have been beyond exciting but not even that.

    Then when I saw it again, I figured out the exact moment when I stopped caring and I struggled to get that same investment I had in the film up to this point. That scene is when Phoebe and Podcast and go into that diner for a ghost call and Phoebes ghost girlfriend is sitting at one of the tables. It was that moment and that moment on where my investment in the film cratered and I tried desperately to get back into the film.

    These two characters are nothing but a vacuum that sucks the fun and investment of the film into a netherworld that you will never get back. Their scenes mainly consist of "Hey hey sure whatever" and I'm left shouting "what is the point? Move forward! Stop wasting time." And apparently, the studio told the filmmakers they had to cut 20 minutes of this movie two weeks before it premiered. Why werent these scenes cut down?

    So many characters and scenes could have gotten the axe with the plethora of characters flooding this film to the point where they move the brother to Slimer duties that had no real purpose in the film. Sunny and Podcast return and add nothing. They should have eliminated them and gave the scenes from Podcast to the brother.

    But theres lots to like too. Dan Ackroyd is at his best here and I'm glad Winston and Murray return too. They have a couple cool new ghosts like Pukey and Possessor that were great additions and say what you want about the new villain, but at least finally the Ghostbusters face a new villain.

    I'm hoping for a directors cut because there is a lot to like in a movie that is dragged down by an extremely boring subplot that gives you Rings of Power vibes in a potentially great Ghostbusters film.
    6willphelan

    Decent Ghostbusters Film

    This film is okay. It's not nearly as good as Ghostbusters Afterlife but it's about what you would expect from a follow up. The new ghosts and elements added to the lore are very cool and some of the visuals are very nice. Some of the jokes are very funny and some aren't. The cast is pretty good here but nothing exceptional performance wise. The action scenes are ok but the final battle is pretty short and a little anti climactic. The original crew is just there to be there with the exception of Dan Aykroyd, who actually has quite a bit of screen time. If you're a Ghostbusters fan you'll probably have a good time with it but don't expect to be blown away.
    mickangel-60488

    I wanted to like it, but it's as bad as they say

    Really bad characters with no substance and a sadly terrible movie. Turning McKenna Grace into some sort of boring Harry Potter character was a big mistake and the plot is full of the usual unbelievable Mary Sue tropes.

    It's strange to me how it seems impossible for Hollywood to turn out a decent movie recently. Constant reshashing of old stories or franchises, with the inevitable eye-rolling tropes being added to make it more pc just smacks of desperation.

    I could possibly understand the misguided attempts at girl-bossing every movie if it meant interesting plots, good acting, and clever writing, but fails so hard. Whatever happen to story-telling and good complex well-cast characters who are cast for their acting talent rather than immutable characteristics?

    Vous aimerez aussi

    S.O.S. fantômes: L'héritage
    7,0
    S.O.S. fantômes: L'héritage
    S.O.S. fantômes II
    6,6
    S.O.S. fantômes II
    S.O.S. fantômes
    7,8
    S.O.S. fantômes
    S.O.S. fantômes
    6,8
    S.O.S. fantômes
    Madame Web
    4,1
    Madame Web
    Godzilla x Kong : Le Nouvel Empire
    6,0
    Godzilla x Kong : Le Nouvel Empire
    Beetlejuice Beetlejuice
    6,6
    Beetlejuice Beetlejuice
    Bad Boys: Ride or Die
    6,5
    Bad Boys: Ride or Die
    Le Flic de Beverly Hills : Axel F.
    6,4
    Le Flic de Beverly Hills : Axel F.
    Venom: The Last Dance
    6,0
    Venom: The Last Dance
    Red One
    6,3
    Red One
    The Ghostbuster
    7,8
    The Ghostbuster

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Bill Murray has frequently been cited as a reason any kind of sequel to S.O.S. fantômes II (1989) took so long to make. The actor's reputation as a "loose cannon" and his desire to distance himself from the franchise for many years led many fans to believe that movies such as S.O.S. fantômes: L'héritage (2021) and this film would never be made. However, director Gil Kenan, who directed Murray in La cité de l'ombre (2008), suggests that getting Murray back for this movie was quite easy, revealing: "Well, you know very well that Bill and I have a history because we made a movie together in 2007, a movie that almost cost [Bill his] life. That was the Hall H experience, and we won't go into too much. But it opened the door for Bill and I to have a relationship that has remained dynamic over the years. We've stayed friends, we've kept in touch. When I reached out to him to say that we were creating a story for Peter Venkman in this film, he was really enthusiastic."
    • Gaffes
      An ancient artifact has been safely kept in a special brass lined room for decades and there are no issues until it is removed from the room. The main characters are aware of this, but nobody even suggests either returning the artifact to the room or making a brass lined container for the artifact. From what is shown, that should solve the problem.
    • Citations

      Nadeem Razmaadi: Does anyone have a lighter?

      Ray Stantz: I quit smoking in the '90s.

      Peter Venkman: [dryly] Proud of you then, proud of you now.

    • Crédits fous
      There is a mid-credits scene with a truck driver at a gas station at night.
    • Connexions
      Featured in Jeremy Jahns: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire - Movie Review (2024)
    • Bandes originales
      Ghostbusters Original Themes
      By Elmer Bernstein

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ

    • How long is Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire?
      Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 10 avril 2024 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
      • Canada
      • Royaume-Uni
    • Sites officiels
      • Official Amazon Link
      • Official Website
    • Langues
      • Anglais
      • Coréen
      • Français
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Ghostbusters: Apocalipsis Fantasma
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Winnersh Film Studios, Winnersh, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(Studio)
    • Sociétés de production
      • Columbia Pictures
      • Ghostcorps
      • TSG Entertainment
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 100 000 000 $US (estimé)
    • Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 113 376 590 $US
    • Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 45 004 673 $US
      • 24 mars 2024
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 201 967 521 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 55 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • IMAX 6-Track
      • Dolby Atmos
      • DTS:X
      • Sonics-DDP
      • 12-Track Digital Sound
      • Auro 11.1
      • Dolby Surround 7.1
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • Réponses IMDb : Aidez à combler les lacunes dans nos données
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.