Dans le Texas de 1874, deux amis et un éclaireur indien sauvent des femmes enlevées à des trafiquants sadiques près de la frontière mexicaine.Dans le Texas de 1874, deux amis et un éclaireur indien sauvent des femmes enlevées à des trafiquants sadiques près de la frontière mexicaine.Dans le Texas de 1874, deux amis et un éclaireur indien sauvent des femmes enlevées à des trafiquants sadiques près de la frontière mexicaine.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
It would be mean to spoiler and deprive you of the watching joy, thus i limited my reviews to points which became better:
1. The plot - elaborated and consistent - great work.
2. Landscapes filming - just magnificent panoramas.
3. Shooting scenes - inheriting the best of westerns 4. Operator work (i rate some sequences better than in John Wick) 5. More first-class actors and new faces 6. Sudden comeback of some previous characters 7. English of the starring Alex Nevsky
One star less since the movie has too much flashbacks to the Gunfight at Rio Bravo.
The fan base knows the original by heart. And if you don't know it, just watch first.
1. The plot - elaborated and consistent - great work.
2. Landscapes filming - just magnificent panoramas.
3. Shooting scenes - inheriting the best of westerns 4. Operator work (i rate some sequences better than in John Wick) 5. More first-class actors and new faces 6. Sudden comeback of some previous characters 7. English of the starring Alex Nevsky
One star less since the movie has too much flashbacks to the Gunfight at Rio Bravo.
The fan base knows the original by heart. And if you don't know it, just watch first.
Once again - it's too damn short! I know it's zero budget and etc, but I was spoiled by classic masterful B-movies and sydicated long running TV shows.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
- Some scenes are beautiful (riding through landscapes, knife fight and shootoot with mexicans),
- The continuation of story and lore (I like when characters remember what they said earlier),
- Cynthia and Don had nice little roles,
- It's kind of campy (sometimes, it's a plus for me),
- I can't deny that Joe Cornet gets better with directing and acting.
Cons:
- /Place your Ad here/
Just another "masterpiece " with Alexander Nevsky (his real surname is Kuritsyn, that means Chicken) - a self proclaimed "actor", "Mr Universe " (he actually claims he won the same title in bodybuilding as...Schwarzenegger!:)), which is insane, as he never won any, and if you really care enough to expose this impudent fraudster- google the Mr Universe winners of all times and try to find Alexander Nevsky in there. Good luck. So, this Russian-born "wanna-be Schwarzenegger" is constantly commiting publicity fraud, taking pictures with various clueless Hollywood actors, and presenting himself as their good friend, while producing ridiculously bad, money-laundry movies, where he acts as a preposterously awful high school actor with non-existent charisma. Poor guy. His mental disease is progressing, and the more he spends on acting, the more lamer his character becomes. A unique case. His "movies" must be considered only as comedies, and that strong feeling of shame that you obtain from those, only indicates of your healthy intelligence. P. S. He writes all the praising comments for himself, along with his circus members. A very cheap and talentless fraud.
This film is capable of conquering the heavens themselves. Alexander Nevsky once again shocked his fans with his brilliant vision of cinema. From the script to the direction, everything in this film is great. It is impossible to express in words the depth of my admiration. Man could not create this masterpiece. Only you, Alexander, the true incarnation of Apollo on earth, could have done this!
Watching your movie, I cried with happiness. My family wept with me, amazed at your unsurpassed genius. You've turned my perception of cinema upside down. Your representation of the Wild West was so historically accurate that I'm afraid you got access to Nikita Mikhalkov's secret documents. You have proved to the haters once and for all the insignificance of their claims. Bravo, Mr. Nevsky, Hollywood is at your feet.
Your place is not among people, but on Olympus!
Watching your movie, I cried with happiness. My family wept with me, amazed at your unsurpassed genius. You've turned my perception of cinema upside down. Your representation of the Wild West was so historically accurate that I'm afraid you got access to Nikita Mikhalkov's secret documents. You have proved to the haters once and for all the insignificance of their claims. Bravo, Mr. Nevsky, Hollywood is at your feet.
Your place is not among people, but on Olympus!
It felt like watching porn, sans the smut. The actors really were so bad, I expected them to throw off all clothes and get down to business any second.
It could've been fantastic in it's own genre, had they done so.
Still giving it a rating of 2, because in some twisted way I enjoy suffering through a really bad movie.
Toward the end, things speed up and it's all very anticlimactic. Seems like everyone is tired of the whole mess, can see there's no way to make the movie any good and just want to wrap it up and call it a day.
To my horror, after it's over, they reveal that there are more movies featuring the same, wooden Russian character as the lead. They're just as bad as this, I'm sure.
I'll probably watch them, when I'm in the mood for some punishment.
It could've been fantastic in it's own genre, had they done so.
Still giving it a rating of 2, because in some twisted way I enjoy suffering through a really bad movie.
Toward the end, things speed up and it's all very anticlimactic. Seems like everyone is tired of the whole mess, can see there's no way to make the movie any good and just want to wrap it up and call it a day.
To my horror, after it's over, they reveal that there are more movies featuring the same, wooden Russian character as the lead. They're just as bad as this, I'm sure.
I'll probably watch them, when I'm in the mood for some punishment.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film is a sequel to Gunfight at Rio Bravo (2023).
- ConnexionsFeatures Gunfight at Rio Bravo (2023)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Taken from Rio Bravo?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 20 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Taken from Rio Bravo (2024)?
Répondre