Les Schtroumpfs 2

Considering how terrible the first film was, the sequel merely had to be adequate to tower over it. And that it does. Its funnier, better plotted, has some half-decent new characters and best of all, less of the cheesy, badly scripted Life Lesson interludes (though some are still present and as toe-curling as ever). Remember though, this is comparatively speaking... put it up against competition like Wall-E and it'll disintegrate in seconds.

I'm more concerned about the prices though... £12.40 to see this in 3D with glasses included at the Odeon. It would have been even more if I'd admitted to sitting in the luxury section. Oops, my mistake. No wonder there was only 10 other people in with me. Though, one of the kids seemed content on spending most of the duration in the toilet, accompanied by their guardian of course. I dunno about you, but if my offspring dragged me to see an expensive flick and spent the majority of it in the bogs, I'd make sure there no more Moshi Monsters related products for a while. HA sweetie... how you like THEM apples?! Oops sorry, mind wandering.

I'm finding it hard to come up with anything else to add to such an unremarkable product. So, lets just leave it at that, shall we? 5/10

I liked the movie but I don't know if I liked how they just added those 2 other "smurfs".

This is an alright enough second instalment for all viewers to watch. The crew could have worked more on this film to make it better but it was still watchable. The storyline of this second instalment film was straightforward and weak. There was not any real direction to it. The cast selection was alright enough. They did not exactly fully commit nor connect to the storyline nor to their respective characters. This second instalment film reveals to viewers that everyone should be accepted for who they really are. During my entire lifetime, I have never been accepted for who I really am. I have always been mistreated. This is an alright second instalment film that could have been better.

I'm really puzzled by these reviews. Firstly, we have people saying they hated the first film but this is even worse. Excuse me, but what kind of stupid do you have to be to watch a sequel to a film you hated? Then there's people who complain that the film is for children? But hey, what did you expect? Well, I expected the worst, I never liked the Smurfs and I'm old enough to remember that awful song from the 70s. I've seen the McDonalds toys and I was prepared to hate this. But every Sunday we take our children to see a movie for a pound and this is what was on. I've seen Despicable Me 2, Turbo, Monsters University, Cloudy with Meatballs 2 and the Rise of the Guardians over the last few weeks on the same terms. I enjoyed those in varying degrees, but I wanted to give this one a miss. But it's for the kids, not me, so I went along. And I guess what, I actually enjoyed it.

There's no point me regurgitating the plot, but highlights for me were Christina Ricci giving a bit of Wednesday to Vexy, the naughty sister Smurf, the one-dimensional pantomime baddie (he's behind you!) and the cat, which amused me if no-one else. The plot is not believable, according to some. Yeah, and you sat though Despicable Me 2 and Cloudy with Meatballs 2? The plot is consistent with the rules set for the movie, just go with it. And if your children like it, what's not to like for you?

'THE SMURFS 2': One and a Half Stars (Out of Five) Sequel to the 2011 hit kids' film based on the popular comic-book (which was later turned into a popular cartoon series in the 1980s) by Peyo (a Belgian comic-book artist) about little blue people that live in mushrooms. It once again stars Hank Azaria as the evil wizard Gargamel and Neil Patrick Harris as the Smurfs' human friend Patrick. It also features voices by Katy Perry, Jonathan Winters (who the film was dedicated to, due to his recent passing) and many others as Smurfs. The film was once again directed by Raja Gosnell and written by the same team of writers (with Karey Kirkpatrick joining the team). I'd say it's even worse than the first film in quality, especially since one of my favorite actresses (Sofia Vergara) didn't return this time around. This film revolves around Gargamel (Azaria) kidnapping Smurfette (voiced by Perry), the only female Smurf (which he created), and taking her back to Paris with him. He needs Papa Smurf's formula for creating Smurfs (which Smurfette knows) so he can extract the Smurf-essence from them (which gives him his magical powers). The film introduces two bad Smurf-like critters that Gargamel also created. They're called Naughties named Vexy (voiced by Christina Ricci) and Hackus (voice by J. B. Smoove). The film also gives us a lot of Smurfette's back story and introduces us to Patrick's stepfather Victor (Brendan Gleeson) as well. The first 'SMURFS' movie was bad and this one is even worse. The only thing I did like about the original movie was it co-starred Sofia Vergara (like I said) as a domineering antagonist (Patrick's boss). She was great and extremely sexy in it (like always) but the rest of the movie was a waste. Both films are pointless and about as dumbed down as kids' movies get. I did like the cartoon and comic books when I was a kid but I don't know if a quality live action film could really be developed from them. So I guess I can't complain too much. Still this movie, like the first, is a waste of time. Kids might like it though.