NOTE IMDb
3,8/10
3,8 k
MA NOTE
Lagent spécial Ross voit sa vie bouleversée lorsquil apprend que son ex-femme, avec qui il tentait de se réconcilier, vient dembarquer à bord dun avion pris pour cible par une dangereuse org... Tout lireLagent spécial Ross voit sa vie bouleversée lorsquil apprend que son ex-femme, avec qui il tentait de se réconcilier, vient dembarquer à bord dun avion pris pour cible par une dangereuse organisation terroriste.Lagent spécial Ross voit sa vie bouleversée lorsquil apprend que son ex-femme, avec qui il tentait de se réconcilier, vient dembarquer à bord dun avion pris pour cible par une dangereuse organisation terroriste.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Rob Steinberg
- Mike Meltzer
- (as Robert Martin Steinberg)
Avis à la une
This is a low budget movie with a typical hijack airliner plot. There is nothing outstanding about the storyline. The set is also poorly and unrealisticly made and it looks like all the action is taking place in a cheap downtown hotel rather than a private aircraft. The acting is also a bit one dimension, where good guys a tough, girls are pretty and bad guys are dumb and unlucky.
One bright thing about this movie is the hand-to-hand combat scenes. It is generally exciting although it can be a bit predictable.
Overall it's 3.5/10. I give them credit because it's a low budget movie. Watch it only if you can't find anything else to watch and keep your expectation down.
One bright thing about this movie is the hand-to-hand combat scenes. It is generally exciting although it can be a bit predictable.
Overall it's 3.5/10. I give them credit because it's a low budget movie. Watch it only if you can't find anything else to watch and keep your expectation down.
Cool - here comes Vinnie Jones, whom I'm a big fan of & Dominic Purcell.
The aircraft scenes look like they're shot in a hotel - very confusing. Do they really have glass fruit bowls sitting on polished wooden tables? Or cargo bays with cars inside, fully pressurised and air-conditioned with extensive lighting and stairs leading up to the passenger compartment?
The action... they do a clever job of avoiding any real action on screen - and there is no excitement or suspense.
The budget for this movie obviously wouldn't even cover the price of admission. The story was so bad, and the plot so sad, that I had to resist the urge to turn it off for a while. Initially thinking it was going to be a pythonesque slow starting rip roaring comedy...
The joke's on me for wasting 40 minutes on this trash!
The aircraft scenes look like they're shot in a hotel - very confusing. Do they really have glass fruit bowls sitting on polished wooden tables? Or cargo bays with cars inside, fully pressurised and air-conditioned with extensive lighting and stairs leading up to the passenger compartment?
The action... they do a clever job of avoiding any real action on screen - and there is no excitement or suspense.
The budget for this movie obviously wouldn't even cover the price of admission. The story was so bad, and the plot so sad, that I had to resist the urge to turn it off for a while. Initially thinking it was going to be a pythonesque slow starting rip roaring comedy...
The joke's on me for wasting 40 minutes on this trash!
clearly a low budget film and the staging and stock shots evidence this. but for what it is, it works. tough guys, good looking girls, and lots of action. i liked the flight attendant, the journalist and the pilot.... that's the guy i want in the cockpit on my next flight. I am up for a sequel and this movie sets the stage nicely for one. Only difference I would like to see is on the budget. spend five times what was spent on the first movie (whatever that amount was ) and you will have a good picture. I am not saying you need to be on location but get staging the has the rounded appearance and proportions of an airplane not a hotel lobby and cast situation actors conforming to the purported location.
When this movie was released on DVD, I was tempted to pay the new rental price to see it, but I ultimately decided not to. The other day I found it available to rent for just a dollar, so I decided to see it. Boy, am I glad I didn't pay full price to see this. I'd be even happier if I had rented another movie for that dollar. For starters, the movie has inconsistent production values, with some scenes looking slick and expensive but other scenes looking downright cheap. Next, Randy Couture is pretty underwhelming in the lead role, lacking charisma as well as emotion when his character speaks. The movie is poorly paced; after the (lame) opening action sequence, it takes more than a half hour before we start getting action again. And none of the action in the movie gets above the routine. There is one bright spot in the movie, and that is Dominic Purcell as the bodyguard. He manages to take his role and make his character pretty interesting. If he had been cast in the lead role, chances are the movie would be significantly better.
I guess I can give the movie the benefit of the doubt. It was a low budget action movie and it felt like it. It most likely did not have the money to really make Die Hard on a plane (or for that matter Snakes on a Plane).
They did make up for the shoe string budget with some cool styled scenes of Randy Culture going after the bad guys, but it really was not enough to make the movie. Plus Vinnie Jones is favorable to watch as well.
I would have to vote on skipping it unless you got nothing better to do. It's not even that good of a low budget Randy Culture film.
They did make up for the shoe string budget with some cool styled scenes of Randy Culture going after the bad guys, but it really was not enough to make the movie. Plus Vinnie Jones is favorable to watch as well.
I would have to vote on skipping it unless you got nothing better to do. It's not even that good of a low budget Randy Culture film.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesScott Adkins was originally cast as Rostow Pawlak but due to filming delays he dropped out. Holt McCallany then accepted the role.
- GaffesEarly in the movie there is a news report stating "a trove of arms from German military forces were discovered in Pakistan". While the reporter specifically says "German military" equipment it shows British SA80 rifles as the supposed German military equipment. Germans do not use the British SA80 rifle platform, instead using their own weapons manufactured in-country.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Hijacked?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 26min(86 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant