NOTE IMDb
4,9/10
12 k
MA NOTE
Le voyage d'un homme vers le futur pour sauver un monde mourant.Le voyage d'un homme vers le futur pour sauver un monde mourant.Le voyage d'un homme vers le futur pour sauver un monde mourant.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 nominations au total
Meme Thorne
- Newsreader
- (as Mémé Thorne)
Avis à la une
Never ever came across a sci-fi with people shedding tears almost in every other scene. A bit over the top 'emotional weight' quotient I'd say! You'll know when you see it.
A bit interesting in parts. Visuals of apocalyptic+future earth are definitely super good. A one time watch on a lazy afternoon
A bit interesting in parts. Visuals of apocalyptic+future earth are definitely super good. A one time watch on a lazy afternoon
It is good sci fi story with suspense, making you guess what will happen in the end. The visuals are good, and the emotional subplot is engaging. I enjoyed it.
Not a bad flick, but not noteworthy either. The effects were decent and gave it a proper sci-fi setting. The Dialogue was wanting, and to be honest, too much crying going on, far too much! It is one of those sci-fis were you have to ignore the science, just accept the plot holes the inaccuracies make. The acting was pretty stiff. It tried hard and probably the effects were the best feature of the film - which is a bit worrying. All in all though, still gets a 5 for a Sunday afternoon which is a pass and not a complete fail
Don't really want to slate this as it tries really hard.
Kept me up til 1am and I still rated it a 6.
Low budget (tried a bit hard to be higher budget) sci-fi with just enough to make you want to see it through.
Music was a bit over the top in places, the actor that played the little kid (although small part) is going places, watch this space.
Trailer made it look much better than it was unfortunately. 6/10 seems fair.
I see that movie as a failed chance. The basic story is solid good from the beginning on, the acting is not bad. I like the effects and the ending, but in-between it has serious logical errors, get's too cheesy at a few moments and the music is sometimes over the top. The message is ok, but at some points it seems to be constructed with a common set of story elements, which are used in other movies. That happens especially when it comes close to the end. For me as a movie dude it feels like I saw those in another version earlier with other actors. I think if they would have spent a little more money for a better script, it could have been more delightful. The idea of this movie is good.
I would recommend it for people who like environmental scifi movies and who didn't see many of them.
I would recommend it for people who like environmental scifi movies and who didn't see many of them.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAlthough the movie takes place in Australia and everyone speaks with an Australian accent, Jude, played by Australian actor Ryan Kwanten, is the only character in the film that inexplicably speaks with an American accent.
- GaffesThey are sending someone 400 years forward in time. With no clue or anything in what kind of (unfriendly?) environment he will arrive. And they don't give him any food or drink for the first days in the future? So he has to eat some berries which are unknown and turned out to be very poisonous.
- Crédits fousNo butterflies were harmed during the making of this film.
- ConnexionsReferences La Machine à explorer le temps (2002)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 2067?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Chronical: 2067
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 54 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant