NOTE IMDb
3,3/10
4,7 k
MA NOTE
Les forces obscures des profondeurs montent à la surface, terrorisant tout le monde à bord du Titanic III et menacent de répéter l'un des plus grands désastres de l'histoire.Les forces obscures des profondeurs montent à la surface, terrorisant tout le monde à bord du Titanic III et menacent de répéter l'un des plus grands désastres de l'histoire.Les forces obscures des profondeurs montent à la surface, terrorisant tout le monde à bord du Titanic III et menacent de répéter l'un des plus grands désastres de l'histoire.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Michael J. Chen
- Parker
- (as Michael Chen)
Tarnue Massaquoi
- Sykes
- (as Joseph Massaquoi)
Heavenly Reyna
- Elizabeth
- (as Hevanly Reyna)
Avis à la une
Not really. I expected a worse movie. The effects were decent and acting was not too bad. Overall, not too bad of a watch. Of course, it's not great but I expected alot worse...
I have to admit, reading the cast list, I was a bit surprised to see certain people involved in this. Be it AnnaLynne or Gatt or some of the others. But not just because of the pandemic, people do need work. And when a streaming plattform offers you money - I guess you are going to accept it, if you have nothing better to do.
The beginning sets the tone - we see the Titanic of the past. And I think you know about the incident and the big iceberg (yes size matters ... I think - let's not get into a climate change discussion). The movie is quite out there and I guess tries to compete with what Asylum has done before it ... but as crazy as those movies are, they do seem to have better CGI ... barely better CGI maybe ... or maybe it just feels like it. Whatever the case, there are quite a few things that do not work here.
I guess certain other aspects (some of the characters you will love to hate) do work. And the actors in front of the camera really do their best ... especially considering what they have to pretend to be in ... or on. Or whatever else.
The beginning sets the tone - we see the Titanic of the past. And I think you know about the incident and the big iceberg (yes size matters ... I think - let's not get into a climate change discussion). The movie is quite out there and I guess tries to compete with what Asylum has done before it ... but as crazy as those movies are, they do seem to have better CGI ... barely better CGI maybe ... or maybe it just feels like it. Whatever the case, there are quite a few things that do not work here.
I guess certain other aspects (some of the characters you will love to hate) do work. And the actors in front of the camera really do their best ... especially considering what they have to pretend to be in ... or on. Or whatever else.
It's asylum and tubi? Bad on purpose like all their stuff.
You're supposed to think it's bad and cheesy. It's not meant to be a 'real' horror.
Think intentionally bad like sharknado.
It does what it set out to do what it achieved and heaven help those who don't know that.
You're supposed to think it's bad and cheesy. It's not meant to be a 'real' horror.
Think intentionally bad like sharknado.
It does what it set out to do what it achieved and heaven help those who don't know that.
The concept behind the movie was great. It had a lot of potential. Unfortunately it was carried out poorly. I've seen better acting in YouTube videos and TikToks. But this was like those pimple popping videos, you don't want to see it, but you can't stop watching.
If it had bee made by another service, it would have been better. It's a case of you get what you pay for. Tubi is free, they rely on ad revenue. If Prime or Netflix had picked up the movie, I think it would have been much better.
If it had bee made by another service, it would have been better. It's a case of you get what you pay for. Tubi is free, they rely on ad revenue. If Prime or Netflix had picked up the movie, I think it would have been much better.
The one thing this movie should be is FUN. That is the major mistake the writers made. If they had gone full SyFy and replaced the ghosts with killer otters, it would have been significantly better. Instead, someone literally said "Hey Gary, let's make a Titanic but the villain is ghouls instead of glaciers."
You shouldn't make a SyFy channel style movie in the genre of horror PERIOD. Entertaining horror needs to have an actual attempt at creating a feeling of fear, or be funny, or even just gory (for people who like that, but not my thing). As none of these exist here, the movie plays out more like a disaster genre film. We have an impending doom that requires us to collectively put our heads together to solve a problem in order to survive.
A schlocky premise is fine, but then to treat the entire plot and dialogue in a serious manner immediately betrays that premise.
On top of this dealbreaker, they double down with another reason for instant failure... no likeable characters. You can only pick 2 types of people in this video game: bland or insufferable. You have nobody to root for in a movie of which you already know the ending, so for what reason do I have to take this journey?
Acting is the same as all these D movies.
Ship effects are distractingly bad and would serve better to not be shown at all. I'm not sure why the set designers think the steering room of a cruise ship would look like a Naval battleship. Horror effects are that of a SeaWorld haunted house, which isn't bad, but not film-worthy. I actually like the plot but it is about as poorly executed as possible.
And yes, I managed to not make any nautical puns throughout this entire review. You're welcome, ya dinghy.
(I rate movies based on expectations. You can't put Sharknado on the same scale as Jaws.)
You shouldn't make a SyFy channel style movie in the genre of horror PERIOD. Entertaining horror needs to have an actual attempt at creating a feeling of fear, or be funny, or even just gory (for people who like that, but not my thing). As none of these exist here, the movie plays out more like a disaster genre film. We have an impending doom that requires us to collectively put our heads together to solve a problem in order to survive.
A schlocky premise is fine, but then to treat the entire plot and dialogue in a serious manner immediately betrays that premise.
On top of this dealbreaker, they double down with another reason for instant failure... no likeable characters. You can only pick 2 types of people in this video game: bland or insufferable. You have nobody to root for in a movie of which you already know the ending, so for what reason do I have to take this journey?
Acting is the same as all these D movies.
Ship effects are distractingly bad and would serve better to not be shown at all. I'm not sure why the set designers think the steering room of a cruise ship would look like a Naval battleship. Horror effects are that of a SeaWorld haunted house, which isn't bad, but not film-worthy. I actually like the plot but it is about as poorly executed as possible.
And yes, I managed to not make any nautical puns throughout this entire review. You're welcome, ya dinghy.
(I rate movies based on expectations. You can't put Sharknado on the same scale as Jaws.)
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesTitanic 666 (2022) was filmed on the retired Queen Mary Ship. Lydia Hearst (Idina Bess) found out her great-grandfather William Randolph Hearst had been a guest on the ship and his former suite was used as a holding area for the cast between scenes.
- GaffesThe flashback to the original Titanic sinking was very historically inaccurate. It is well known that the ship broke in two and the funnels detached before taking its final plunge. This movie showed the ship sinking and reaching the bottom of the ocean fully intact and with all it's funnels still attached.
- ConnexionsFollows Titanic: Odyssée 2012 (2010)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Titanic 666?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Titanic Rises
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 214 456 $US
- Durée1 heure 31 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant