Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueGreen Valley was a housing commission estate in western Sydney, much maligned by the media of the day.Green Valley was a housing commission estate in western Sydney, much maligned by the media of the day.Green Valley was a housing commission estate in western Sydney, much maligned by the media of the day.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Photos
Histoire
Commentaire à la une
This is an intriguing documentary. The structure is quite unusual. We begin with the director, Peter Weir, introducing his own short satire about a large public housing project on the outskirts of Sydney, to a group of the residents. His short presents the many problems the project faces, with limited services having been provided and thus, limited opportunities for the population. He then introduces a series of short docos directed by different local residents, who provide personal insights into life in the 'valley'. Allowing people to tell their own stories in this way, gives the film a sense of authenticity and limits the often intrusive 'voice' of the filmmaker, that can hamper some docos.
This all works on two levels. On the one hand, it is a fascinating document of suburban life in 1970s Australia. The architecture, the clothing, the vernacular are all very of their time, making the film a useful 'time capsule'. However, the issues raised, about how governments/society attempts to 'engineer' life for poor/working class people, remain deeply relevant. The aspirations and frustrations of the people feel very universal, which allows the film to remain relatable. It's also quite self-reflective, in its assessment of the 'media' coverage of the 'valley' (mostly negative) and allowing the residents to comment on the film itself.
Reminiscent of Michael Apted's 'Up' series, or Gillian Armstrong's 'Smokes and Lollies' (and it's sequels), this is documentary as a direct social assessment. Not on the scale of those projects, this is still a worthwhile film, that deserve more recognition.
This all works on two levels. On the one hand, it is a fascinating document of suburban life in 1970s Australia. The architecture, the clothing, the vernacular are all very of their time, making the film a useful 'time capsule'. However, the issues raised, about how governments/society attempts to 'engineer' life for poor/working class people, remain deeply relevant. The aspirations and frustrations of the people feel very universal, which allows the film to remain relatable. It's also quite self-reflective, in its assessment of the 'media' coverage of the 'valley' (mostly negative) and allowing the residents to comment on the film itself.
Reminiscent of Michael Apted's 'Up' series, or Gillian Armstrong's 'Smokes and Lollies' (and it's sequels), this is documentary as a direct social assessment. Not on the scale of those projects, this is still a worthwhile film, that deserve more recognition.
- pauluswiggus
- 7 sept. 2021
- Permalien
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Whatever happened to Green Valley?: Residents express their views of their life in Green Valley on a film which they themselves produced in its entirety
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée56 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Whatever Happened to Green Valley? (1973) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre