[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Extracted

  • 2012
  • R
  • 1h 29min
NOTE IMDb
6,4/10
13 k
MA NOTE
Extracted (2012)
A scientist invents a technique to enter people's memories deep within their subconscious when their mind is at its most vulnerable state. When he is tasked with entering a convicted criminal's mind to see whether he committed murder, he is faced with his most dangerous and risky memory extraction ever.
Lire trailer2:05
7 Videos
20 photos
DramaSci-Fi

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA scientist who has invented a technology to construct virtual realities from people's memories finds himself in a perilous situation, after he reluctantly allows it to be used for a purpose... Tout lireA scientist who has invented a technology to construct virtual realities from people's memories finds himself in a perilous situation, after he reluctantly allows it to be used for a purpose he never imagined.A scientist who has invented a technology to construct virtual realities from people's memories finds himself in a perilous situation, after he reluctantly allows it to be used for a purpose he never imagined.

  • Réalisation
    • Nir Paniry
  • Scénario
    • Nir Paniry
    • Gabriel Cowan
    • John Suits
  • Casting principal
    • Sasha Roiz
    • Jenny Mollen
    • Dominic Bogart
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    6,4/10
    13 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Nir Paniry
    • Scénario
      • Nir Paniry
      • Gabriel Cowan
      • John Suits
    • Casting principal
      • Sasha Roiz
      • Jenny Mollen
      • Dominic Bogart
    • 82avis d'utilisateurs
    • 23avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 1 nomination au total

    Vidéos7

    Theatrical Trailer
    Trailer 2:05
    Theatrical Trailer
    International Version
    Trailer 1:53
    International Version
    International Version
    Trailer 1:53
    International Version
    Extracted: Clip 2
    Clip 1:28
    Extracted: Clip 2
    Extracted: Clip 4
    Clip 1:43
    Extracted: Clip 4
    Extracted: Clip 1
    Clip 1:38
    Extracted: Clip 1
    Extracted: Clip 5
    Clip 0:53
    Extracted: Clip 5

    Photos20

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 16
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux28

    Modifier
    Sasha Roiz
    Sasha Roiz
    • Tom
    Jenny Mollen
    Jenny Mollen
    • Abbey
    Dominic Bogart
    Dominic Bogart
    • Anthony
    Richard Riehle
    Richard Riehle
    • Father Riley
    Nick Jameson
    Nick Jameson
    • Richard
    Rodney Eastman
    Rodney Eastman
    • Eric
    Frank Ashmore
    Frank Ashmore
    • Martino
    Brad Culver
    Brad Culver
    • Garrett
    Ty Simpkins
    Ty Simpkins
    • Young Anthony
    Sara Tomko
    Sara Tomko
    • Minnie
    Augie Duke
    Augie Duke
    • Adrienne
    Mattie Grace Campos
    • Donna
    Jen Davis
    Jen Davis
    • Richard's Wife
    Bernhard Forcher
    Bernhard Forcher
    • Detective Mathieu
    Darren Melameth
    • Detective Laird
    Robert Lewis Stephenson
    Robert Lewis Stephenson
    • Arthur
    Matt Fowler
    Matt Fowler
    • Prison Guard
    Jay Bingham
    Jay Bingham
    • Officer Mobley
    • Réalisation
      • Nir Paniry
    • Scénario
      • Nir Paniry
      • Gabriel Cowan
      • John Suits
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs82

    6,412.7K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    Rabbit-Reviews

    Great sci-fi indie movie

    Utterly confused about the title of this movie (it's either Extraction or Extracted) and its quality I dived in it, expecting nothing. What I got in return was something that seemed really innovative and new, but was actually a really old idea with a twist. It all revolves around a device that allows you to access and immerse yourself into other people memories and experiences, much like the movie Strange Days [1995]. This time we can witness how that device was made and funded, and eventually tested. The clash of the science and real, corrupt and devious world is another thing that I liked about Extracted. Although the hipster assistant was a bit too much. The cast is relatively unknown but they did their job really good. Dominic Bogart (Anthony) stole the show from lead actor Sasha Roiz (Tom), as the drug addicted accused of murdering his girlfriend. This doesn't mean that Sasha was bad, but just that Dominic was more passionate and realistic. Sasha redeemed himself, either intentionally or unintentionally, by giving his character a dose of douchiness, showing us that not everything is black or white.

    Tom and Eric are a couple of scientist working on a machine that would allow them to go into peoples minds and memories. The main purpose of this device is to help autistic and other people with severe psychological and physical disabilities, but as the research starts to reach its critical phase they are forced to take funding no matter what obligations it may bring. Through Richard, their middleman, they contact a mysterious stranger who is willing to fund their research. As it turns out the mysterious stranger had some other things in mind when he decided to invest, but one thing remained the same, the test. They meet on a remote farm in the country, and there it all goes as planned, right up 'till the end where Tom is supposed to exit the subjects mind…

    The real rating of this movie should be 7 or 8, but I am giving it a 9 to encourage filmmakers and others to follow their example. With a unique script, several overlapping stories which all make you think and look at things from another perspective, Extracted is an example of how science fiction movie with a restricted budget should be made. You start with a very good concept idea, build characters on it, hire the right people to play them and eventually direct the whole thing. A job well done…

    Movie recommendations Rabbit-Reviews.com - Only movies worth watching
    8greeneyez01

    underrated score is rubbish

    IMDb got it wrong the film is great great character portrayal very believable strong story and all in all very enjoyable to watch right from the start the idea is captivating which in some cases if you take such a good idea , bad IMDb score= a b or c grade film bad camera work crap script and you start thinking oh great this is one of those eagle entertainment flicks. but this film is the complete opposite.I'm glad i took the time to see it,i passed on it a few times but when i had a read of the comments i thought hey they cant be all wrong which makes me wonder how many other films that I've passed on that are actually good because of IMDb giving it a rubbish score lesson learned i think

    you wont be disappointed
    9dk34997

    Much, much, better than it's rating.

    I'm taking the time to review this, which I often do not, considering I watch every movie that is released, because the rating on this movie is far to low. It's definitely not a 9 ( my rating standard is tough, ) which I have given it, but it's definitely far from a 5; I gave it a 9 in the hopes it's overall rating would be raised.

    Anyways, how people are giving this such a bad rating are beyond me. Everything that you expect in a movie was there, great character portrayals, great writing, and obviously good direction. This director/writer I'll definitely be keeping an eye to see what he can do wit a bigger budget. Great work.
    7omarh92

    Indeed an excellent indie sci-fi film

    IMDb's recommendation seems to be working well since this is where I found this film. As an avid sci-fi fan, a regular indie film watcher, I can most certainly say this is indeed an excellent film.

    When I read the plot, the first that came on my mind was Chris Nolan's Inception, and I love movies with themes of the human mind. Of course this film is different from Inception in so many ways, but Extracted is not a let down. What can also amaze you is, you can tell this film had a low budget, but it was done very well, and looks very professional.

    The film starts slow but progresses well. Cast is good, all actors and actresses played their parts well, plot is great, ending is great.

    It is true some things may not make sense in the film, but that is why the genre is sci-fi, where things that don't make sense are explained at its best.

    Extracted is a great movie. Highly underrated, but excellent.
    7llarian-2

    Great little independent movie

    A little slow to get started but stick with it for 20 mins and you won't be disappointed.

    Without giving spoilers, the ending was a little "by the numbers" and I might have preferred a twist of some kind rather than a straight resolution. In saying that, though, certainly doesn't deserve anything less than a 6.

    There's certainly potential for a sequel here and the ending I'm thinking of would have lent itself to that. No matter, though,

    A very creditable early full-length work by Nir Paniry, who should now try his hand at something even larger-scale.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    The Fare
    6,3
    The Fare
    Radius
    6,2
    Radius
    Infinity Chamber
    6,2
    Infinity Chamber
    Enter Nowhere
    6,5
    Enter Nowhere
    The Frame
    6,5
    The Frame
    OtherLife
    6,2
    OtherLife
    Uncanny
    6,2
    Uncanny
    Parallels
    6,0
    Parallels
    Mouse-X
    6,9
    Mouse-X
    ARQ
    6,3
    ARQ
    41
    6,2
    41
    Projet Almanac
    6,4
    Projet Almanac

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      The original opening for this film was much longer and went into greater detail on how Tom's machine worked.
    • Gaffes
      Warning: Spoilers Police always check for gunpowder traces on hands to verify who is the shooter. It would have shown who is guilty and who is innocent.

      From an active police detective: The police (specifically the medical examiner) would likely only test for gunshot residue if they saw stippling, powder burns, or defensive wounds, which helps establish if the shooter was standing close by. But they wouldn't check this with suicide in mind. You get the residue by being close to the gun when it goes off, and it doesn't matter which end of the barrel you're on. So the presence of residue on her hands wouldn't mean she had to have fired the gun. There is no plot hole here.
    • Citations

      Tom: A Guilt is a powerful thing. It compels... it becomes an obsession... and You have a choice... you can either wallow in it or you can change.

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ16

    • How long is Extracted?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 9 septembre 2013 (Royaume-Uni)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Site officiel
      • Official Facebook
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Tâm Ngục
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Los Angeles, Californie, États-Unis(main location)
    • Société de production
      • New Artists Alliance
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 29 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39:1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Extracted (2012)
    Lacune principale
    What is the French language plot outline for Extracted (2012)?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.