Un homme qui échappe des vicieuses griffes d'un tueur en série appelé "Le Collectionneur" se voit ensuite obligé d'aider à sauver une innocente jeune fille de la tanière bourrée de pièges du... Tout lireUn homme qui échappe des vicieuses griffes d'un tueur en série appelé "Le Collectionneur" se voit ensuite obligé d'aider à sauver une innocente jeune fille de la tanière bourrée de pièges du tueur.Un homme qui échappe des vicieuses griffes d'un tueur en série appelé "Le Collectionneur" se voit ensuite obligé d'aider à sauver une innocente jeune fille de la tanière bourrée de pièges du tueur.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Brian
- (as William Peltz)
- Elena (9 years old)
- (as Courtney Cummings)
Avis à la une
The thing which made the previous film so good is the same thing that makes this... the tension and suspense. Dunstan is a maestro at manipulating the pace and atmosphere to get you on the edge of your seat. Every time a trap is sprung you wonder how nasty it'll be... answer... very nasty. That's the second thing keeping the audiences attention, the kills and the action. There is a tonne of gore, enough to keep Hershall Lewis smiling in heaven, and plenty enough for the gorehounds.
Stewart is much better as Arkin in this film. It would appear that being the collector's plaything has added an extra depth or two to him. His motivation to escape is evident in every scene he's in. Lee Tergesen does a passable job as the hired killer Lucello. However, the rest of his merry men are ten-a-penny redshirts... proper cannon fodder. So, it would appear that the writers decided not to fill out their characters too much. Then there was Fitzpatrick as Elena, who was okay while she didn't say anything. However, when she did speak she spoke with wooden tongue.
The special effects were awesome, the re-breaking of Arkin's arm and the escape attempt is quite nearly sickening. The sewn together body parts is eerie and disturbing. And the traps are gruesome and deadly. Hopefully, all of this should be enough to satisfy, who needs a story, right(?)
The story really could have made this into a better and stronger film. In the original, all you had to do was forget that it takes time to jerry-rig a house with all the traps, the collector used - forgivable, for entertainment's sake.
The character of the collector breaks into a house and leaves a present for the homeowners. A trunk, inside of which is a tortured person from his previous escapade. This "Present" is for shock value to throw the prey into confusion and fear. Then he sets about torturing and killing everyone, but one, in the house... nobody lives.
This is even mentioned on a TV News Broadcast in the sequel. There's been a spree of home invasions with this MO. Even though it's the police being interviewed in the broadcast there appears to be no manhunt for The Collector. No Task Force. No FBI. Then there's a party at a secret location... not too secret as TC's had time to set up a really nasty combine harvester trap, which is rigged to the trunk, hidden away in one of the rooms of the derelict house. Boy, he was really hoping that somebody would be curious enough to go looking through a condemned building, so they'd set the trap off.
Then when we get to his hotel it just gets worse. Not only does this killer torture and murder homeowners but he must also be picking up people off the street judging by the number of dismembered cadavers laying around... Not only that, but he now has "The Collection" roaming around the place too. People too scared to try and escape. Most of which are high on drugs. TC must be cooking the stuff or he really is one sick rich dude. However, the strange thing is the traps in this place... a place that's his so he has all the time in the world to construct the best traps ever, but are really weak-assed. One of them is a hallway of plywood with nails knocked through them. They don't even move together. Another is a hallway full of bear traps. Which you can easily get through by just walking to the side of them. Damn this place really needed Kevin McCallister's touch.
Then there's the stitched together body parts. Looks, like TC's been watching The Human Centipede, what a sicko... This absolutely breaks with his persona. There is no way that he would do this. And then to arrange them in some kind of fluid inside glass canisters... believability is out the window.
Had the writers chosen, not to go down this path but to remain on the original and begin to explain TC's psychosis and background a little then it would have only helped to define the character better. The strongest films give their audience an inkling into the psychopath and his thinking. You know what's eating Norman, what's driving Michael, why Freddy is so evil, and even Jason gets a backstory and motivation. These add to the power of their characters and hopefully the films.
If you're a gorehound then this film is definitely for you. If you don't like blood then I'd recommend you stay away.
If the first one was a home invasion thriller, this one is basically Saw + Crazy Action Film. It is different from the first one but it is great / crazy in its own way. More action heavy than the first one. The set design / gore / effects are the stand outs.
It is sad that the 3rd movie apparently got cancelled, but The Collection does work as a conclusion to this story I guess.
7.5/10 maybe 8?
The film is pretty much non-stop action, violence, and gore. There are plot-holes a'plenty here -- the killer must be a multi-billionaire and able to control time and space to be able to do what he does, so too much thinking (heck, ANY thinking) will only damage your enjoyment of the film. But if you want to spend 90 minutes at a fun, gory flick, "The Collection" will do just fine.
After enjoying The Collector, I was looking forward to watching this sequel and while it's not as good as the first film I still found that it was worth the watch. This one definitely has much more of a Saw type of feel to it than the first as well which in one way is good because it generates a similar kind of dark, tense atmosphere but is bad in another way in that it's not very original BECAUSE it's just like Saw.
While there's a good amount of tension to this movie, I feel that it lacks the suspense of the first. The first had much more of a cat and mouse feel to it probably because it was in such a refined space like a house which brought about a good sense of claustrophobia. Here, even though the people are still trapped inside a building, it's a much bigger building and it just feels more open.
The movie comes at you right from the start and thankfully it keeps a decent pace. So many movies throw you right in at the deep end at the start but fail to keep you interested afterwards. The Collection doesn't do that, and after such an intense start, it keeps the pace up pretty well.
Gore fans should enjoy this one too, as that has been ramped up from the first one.
All in all, while The Collection isn't a cinematic masterpiece (and at least is doesn't pretend to be either), it's still a good movie to watch. Recommended, especially if you enjoy movies like Saw.
If you can just go with it, and you like really scary, psychological thrilling, torture-porn horror flicks like SAW, it's pretty good. It's certainly scary, quite unpredictable, and the acting is actually... not terrible. The plot is original. It's very gory. But it didn't come across as being all about the gore. It had you thinking, "What would I do if I was in that situation." Most of the time, my answer was - Sit down and cry.
I compare it to the Saw franchise, because it was written by some of the guys who wrote some of those, and because of the sadistic puzzles the people had to go through. But it really isn't the same as Saw because the plot was different. I would say if you like the Saw movies, you'd really enjoy this. If you didn't, don't waste you time. It's wouldn't be your type of film.
I gave it an 8 meaning it to be compared only to other horror movies, not to all movies in general. It certainly isn't for non-horror people. And it isn't a family film. Some of it was very hard to watch. I was proud of the fact that the ticket seller refused to sell a ticket to the 20-year-old in front of me trying to buy tickets for the 10 and 12 year olds she brought to this. It's not for kiddies at all.
I'm going to get part 1 (The Collector) on Netflix, then hope part 3 (if there is one) is as good.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe "Hotel Argento" where the Collector has his victims is a nod to the cult Italian horror director Dario Argento.
- GaffesAt 1:01:05 Arkin lets Paz break his arm, then when he fights the collector starting at 1:05, he uses both arms to grab, punch and throw the collector.
- Citations
[last lines]
Arkin: All those insects, you're quite the collector. In a 200-mile radius from where we last saw each other, there are 14 licensed entomologists. And you were number 12. Your daddy ran a museum, didn't he? Fucked you up real good. Turn around.
[Arkin presses a gun against the back of The Collector's head]
Arkin: Turn around.
[the Collector slowly turns around]
The Collector: Are you here to kill me?
Arkin: No. That'd be too nice. First I'm gonna make you feel everything that I felt. And then I'm gonna kill you. So that you can never hurt anyone...
[the Collector attacks Arkin, but is overpowered and thrown into a trunk]
Arkin: [slamming the trunk shut] Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck you!
- Crédits fousEnd Credits show how the lead characters died/survived, while displaying their names respectively
- Versions alternativesTwo versions were released in Germany. An uncut SPIO/JK rated version and a censored FSK-18 rated version. The latter which is cut by two minutes and 37 seconds to remove most of the gruesome bits of violence.
- ConnexionsEdited from The Collector (2009)
- Bandes originalesTalk to Me
Written by Mauro Remiddi
Performed by Porcelain Raft
Courtesy of Sunday Music Management
Meilleurs choix
- How long is The Collection?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Juegos de muerte
- Lieux de tournage
- Los Angeles, Californie, États-Unis(reshoots)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 7 500 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 6 842 058 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 3 104 269 $US
- 2 déc. 2012
- Montant brut mondial
- 9 929 706 $US
- Durée1 heure 22 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1