Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueChris is a psychic who lives his life out of order - experiencing past, present and future as a jigsaw puzzle. But when he commits a murder in the future, he has to change his past and prese... Tout lireChris is a psychic who lives his life out of order - experiencing past, present and future as a jigsaw puzzle. But when he commits a murder in the future, he has to change his past and present in order to prevent it from happening.Chris is a psychic who lives his life out of order - experiencing past, present and future as a jigsaw puzzle. But when he commits a murder in the future, he has to change his past and present in order to prevent it from happening.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 6 victoires au total
Allison F. Phillipps
- Joan
- (as Allison Findlater-Galinsky)
Avis à la une
I'm not sure I could even begin to describe this film's plot, save that it has something to do with street-merchant psychics and the maybe-maybe-not deaths of two policemen. It bounces back and forth through time — not to mention alternate times — so much that for the first little while, you're sure to be wondering what you've gotten yourself into by watching it.
But about halfway through, suddenly it all starts to make some sort of elegantly distant sense, and you find yourself getting wrapped up in the story of someone who might or might not have killed someone and who might or might not be working at a place where he divines the owners of bits of stuff for the benefit of unknown powers that be.
I know I'm not making a lot of sense. Neither does FOUND IN TIME. It has a secondary character who might be God or might be someone else. We're not sure, and the screenwriter doesn't say for certain one way or another. But his job appears to be to send people around in time to do... something... somehow...
It's just strange and odd and yet very compelling. A friend of mine described it as "12 Monkeys without a budget" — and yet it's not because it's far more complex. You have to keep your wits about you watching a movie like this.
The reason for eight stars and not 10? It has its shortcomings — the masks the psychologists wear look, at the outset, a little... okay, a lot silly. I understand the concept behind them, but they don't really work all that well. And there are moments when the storyline becomes a little too self-reflectively precious... and yet I'm not sure where you could trim that away without ruining the very distinct pleasure this film offers. And while most of the performances are distinctly compelling, a few — specifically, the two policemen and the girlfriend — are just a tad over the top, thus ruining the "reality" the film seeks to portray.
But I can forgive those, actually: it's a low-budget indie film, after all. Once you look past those are how wondrously brilliant the conceit and its execution are, there are joys to be found.
Just watch out for the nails...
But about halfway through, suddenly it all starts to make some sort of elegantly distant sense, and you find yourself getting wrapped up in the story of someone who might or might not have killed someone and who might or might not be working at a place where he divines the owners of bits of stuff for the benefit of unknown powers that be.
I know I'm not making a lot of sense. Neither does FOUND IN TIME. It has a secondary character who might be God or might be someone else. We're not sure, and the screenwriter doesn't say for certain one way or another. But his job appears to be to send people around in time to do... something... somehow...
It's just strange and odd and yet very compelling. A friend of mine described it as "12 Monkeys without a budget" — and yet it's not because it's far more complex. You have to keep your wits about you watching a movie like this.
The reason for eight stars and not 10? It has its shortcomings — the masks the psychologists wear look, at the outset, a little... okay, a lot silly. I understand the concept behind them, but they don't really work all that well. And there are moments when the storyline becomes a little too self-reflectively precious... and yet I'm not sure where you could trim that away without ruining the very distinct pleasure this film offers. And while most of the performances are distinctly compelling, a few — specifically, the two policemen and the girlfriend — are just a tad over the top, thus ruining the "reality" the film seeks to portray.
But I can forgive those, actually: it's a low-budget indie film, after all. Once you look past those are how wondrously brilliant the conceit and its execution are, there are joys to be found.
Just watch out for the nails...
Either I am too stupid to "get it" or the one's who claim to get it are afraid of appearing too stupid, like an "Emperor's New Clothes" kind of thing? i won't insist on the latter. I mean it was easy enough to see the artistic attempt, a kind of Picasso thing or something using film making rather than paint. Employing many devices such as masks on Psychologists, and serving up cups of coffee supposedly individually programmed to a person's current needs in something ....
Look, I am not Mensa or anything, not educated in critiquing of art etc. But at the same time I am also not one that can stand being force fed things employing idiot laugh tracks or gross cliché otherwise found so enjoyable to the lower end of the scale...ya know? Somewhere in the middle is what I am saying, for whatever that is worth, considering my opinion.
Bottom line, for me personally? it was a big fat FAIL. I don't think anyone could honestly, straight faced not immediately recognize that much of the acting lacked severely ....amateur hour kind of of thing one might see in after hours soft cable porn or high school plays etc. Don't get me wrong, I mean I really do think I sort of see what the screenplay and direction attempted to do, but it just fails IMHO...as they say "Your Mileage may Vary" (YMMV?) I am thinking that someone more skilled MIGHT be able to pull something off like this attempt, but these folks just failed in my case. (did I overuse the word "fail"? I don't think so...lol)
Look, I am not Mensa or anything, not educated in critiquing of art etc. But at the same time I am also not one that can stand being force fed things employing idiot laugh tracks or gross cliché otherwise found so enjoyable to the lower end of the scale...ya know? Somewhere in the middle is what I am saying, for whatever that is worth, considering my opinion.
Bottom line, for me personally? it was a big fat FAIL. I don't think anyone could honestly, straight faced not immediately recognize that much of the acting lacked severely ....amateur hour kind of of thing one might see in after hours soft cable porn or high school plays etc. Don't get me wrong, I mean I really do think I sort of see what the screenplay and direction attempted to do, but it just fails IMHO...as they say "Your Mileage may Vary" (YMMV?) I am thinking that someone more skilled MIGHT be able to pull something off like this attempt, but these folks just failed in my case. (did I overuse the word "fail"? I don't think so...lol)
This has a fairly unique premise, while movies about psychics being commonplace isn't strange, the way these people interact with society is unique to say the least. Rather than these people necessarily telling the future, they rather provide services to "normal" people as street vendors because they are unable to integrate into "normal" society. This is a rich concept that is a fantastic idea without all of the complicated trappings of this film, and the concept certainly suffers from the convoluted nature of this film, being filmed out sequence, and it also revolves around alternate timelines and universes.
This is not at all as bad as some people are claiming, it requires extreme close attention to detail while you watch, it still leaves a little too much ambiguity, a little less philosophical waxing, and a little more explanation in some areas would have really helped. That said, it is still an interesting film to watch with a lot of philosophical ideas. By the end of the film, you are left to mull over what you watched and try to piece it together, and while that is fine, it does suffer from throwing too many ideas into the mix, there is a heck of a lot going on here philosophically: the idea of what it means to be "good", the concept of free will versus fate, near death experiences, the nature of consciousness, the nature of love, and more.
The acting is decent enough, the camera work is decent, the sound is good, music is very minimally used here(which is a good thing), and the script, as already stated is a bit too convoluted for its own good, but very interesting. This is a good film for those who enjoy their movies left of center and do not like everything spoon fed to them, anyone who wants everything explained will probably turn this off in anger or beat the TV or phone out of frustration. In the end, it remains an ambitious piece of low-budget film making that never totally gels together, but still has a lot to offer.
This is not at all as bad as some people are claiming, it requires extreme close attention to detail while you watch, it still leaves a little too much ambiguity, a little less philosophical waxing, and a little more explanation in some areas would have really helped. That said, it is still an interesting film to watch with a lot of philosophical ideas. By the end of the film, you are left to mull over what you watched and try to piece it together, and while that is fine, it does suffer from throwing too many ideas into the mix, there is a heck of a lot going on here philosophically: the idea of what it means to be "good", the concept of free will versus fate, near death experiences, the nature of consciousness, the nature of love, and more.
The acting is decent enough, the camera work is decent, the sound is good, music is very minimally used here(which is a good thing), and the script, as already stated is a bit too convoluted for its own good, but very interesting. This is a good film for those who enjoy their movies left of center and do not like everything spoon fed to them, anyone who wants everything explained will probably turn this off in anger or beat the TV or phone out of frustration. In the end, it remains an ambitious piece of low-budget film making that never totally gels together, but still has a lot to offer.
10Bcphx
I saw this movie in October of 2012 at it's screening for Shirekfest. It was my favorite film of the festival (it ended up winning best sci/fi feature). It's been over a year since I've seen the movie, but I still think of it often. As an independent filmmaker working on my first feature length movie, I was blown away by it's energy and compelling story. Time has blurred the details so I won't attempt to give a thorough analysis, but I was enthralled and totally wrapped up in the experience of the movie. It soars with a joy for story telling absent in so many big budget Hollywood films, demonstrating low budget/gorilla film making at it's best. Some scenes were clearly shot on the busy streets of NYC using passersby as extras. Some went so far as to wave at the camera. This only added to the charm of the film. I check the website often hoping the film has been picked up for distribution. I would love to see this indie gem again and show it to my friends as well.
This is sort of a "fun" interesting movie that draws you in bc you really want to see where all the strangeness leads. There are many flaws, but considering the low budget indie status, I think they can be overlooked for the most part. The leads were decent with their acting, the psycops were horrible. I agree the psych masks were also silly, they could have showed anonymity using a different sort of mask. The psychedelic graphics at the beginning credits were a nice touch, as were all the other artistic touches throughout the movie.
I agree, not all will like or appreciate this film, it takes a certain "type" to appreciate a unique work like this. I'd say if the synopsis and the reviews click for you, you should give it a shot ull be entertained by something completely different than mainstream.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesAlthough the film bends reality easily, the vendor corner is in the Bronx but the summons Chris gets was sent to a Brooklyn address and tells him to appear in a Brooklyn court.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant