NOTE IMDb
4,6/10
1,8 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueDanny Hill's grandmother just died giving him the opportunity to live in her rent controlled apartment in Manhattan. But as Danny quickly discovers, he may not be the only occupant.Danny Hill's grandmother just died giving him the opportunity to live in her rent controlled apartment in Manhattan. But as Danny quickly discovers, he may not be the only occupant.Danny Hill's grandmother just died giving him the opportunity to live in her rent controlled apartment in Manhattan. But as Danny quickly discovers, he may not be the only occupant.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Photos
Avis à la une
Well, I was really anticipating this film. Van Hanis did a good job but the point is this may be on the line of a Polanski-but it left me not horrified, or feeling the ending was a total twist of the mind. With the exception of a few things such as the building looking like the Dakota-the elevator operator and Van Hansis change in appearance it was a far cry from anything that Polanski ever did. However I did enjoy the Doorman, Joe-two thumbs up Thorsten Kaye-I'm biased.
Will I view it again in the 24 hours that VOD gives you? Maybe so it can grow on me. Maybe not.
This was definitely not what I had myself hyped up for.
Will I view it again in the 24 hours that VOD gives you? Maybe so it can grow on me. Maybe not.
This was definitely not what I had myself hyped up for.
At the start of this movie my hopes were high - an original plot with the scope for scary ghosty stuff. Unfortunately, when you're stuck in an apartment which you 'can't' leave it doesn't take long for the boredom to set in. There was an opportunity for chills and thrills but for some reason the execution is dull and listless. For some reason I started getting a hankering for The Shining - the definitive descent into madness. If you watch The Apartment then you'll get similar pangs after about 20 minutes.
If you delve into Korean horror then you can discover interesting themes fully realised and not just imagined by the director.
Nili has put together a classy list - http://www.imdb.com/list/8txFAcBLcUo/
If you delve into Korean horror then you can discover interesting themes fully realised and not just imagined by the director.
Nili has put together a classy list - http://www.imdb.com/list/8txFAcBLcUo/
OK, I'm gonna write this short: This movie has some really nice shots, in the beginning it creates an interesting, little weird story, the acting is pretty nice ... BUT there are so many plot holes, so many stuff that happens without any reason, just for the effect and there's no horror at all. This movie is just a concept ... looks like they ran out of money and had to end it somehow. This is sad, because it really had a decent start and could have been a remarkable film. This way there is no comparison to any Polanski movie.
Usually it's nice to watch a movie and in the end be left with a few questions to talk about and to discuss ... but here it's just too much. Why all this?
Usually it's nice to watch a movie and in the end be left with a few questions to talk about and to discuss ... but here it's just too much. Why all this?
I saw this title on a website that I subscribe to and when I saw the reviews on IMDb I figured I would give it a try.
I will say this, it is not a BAD movie. It also is not a great movie.
It runs VERY slow and tries to build up the suspense.
I had a feeling I knew what was happening from the beginning, but the movie just tries to pull your mind in too many directions.
First, there is the creepy feeling the people around him give. Second, there is the building itself. Third, there is the feeling like something else is there.
Don't expect to be scared by this film, but don't expect to be impressed either...
I will say this, it is not a BAD movie. It also is not a great movie.
It runs VERY slow and tries to build up the suspense.
I had a feeling I knew what was happening from the beginning, but the movie just tries to pull your mind in too many directions.
First, there is the creepy feeling the people around him give. Second, there is the building itself. Third, there is the feeling like something else is there.
Don't expect to be scared by this film, but don't expect to be impressed either...
"Occupant" isn't the smartest effort of recent memory, nor is it the scariest, but it's certainly unique enough to be worth mentioning. The plot here isn't especially innovative, borrowing heavily from movies like "1408" and Stanley Kubrick's "The Shining," but much like said inspiration, the execution is what differentiates this film from the slew of other cheap imitations. The movie is actually pretty sleek- looking for a lower-budget offering, and it makes effective use of its small, fairly-unknown cast, especially leading man Van Hansis, whose portrayal of a man grappling with his sanity is so convincing its unsettling. The atmosphere is dark, disturbing, and suspenseful, akin to an under-your-skin David Lynch head trip; it's that special blend of intentionally-ambiguous psychological thriller and supernatural horror that makes this a very carrot-on-a-stick experience, never allowing the viewer to turn away once the action begins its slow-burning buildup.
For the rest of my review, please check out my movie review blog: http://filmsallthetime.blogspot.com
For the rest of my review, please check out my movie review blog: http://filmsallthetime.blogspot.com
Le saviez-vous
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Occupant?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Оккупант
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 26 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant