[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
Retour
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Charlie Cox in En traître (2022)

Avis des utilisateurs

En traître

317 commentaires
5/10

Average

Ridiculous plots destroy what could have been a good show, the twists are so silly and childish they are well beyond belief.

The hero who gets promoted to chief of MI6 is totally clueless, too young and too compromised to even look real.

At every stage, individuals are infiltrating MI6 with a mobile phone while sitting at home, MI6 is this bunch of no nothing guys sitting around in flash offices wearing flash suits cracking jokes and making childish remarks about National security, there doesn't appear to be any security around them or their families, its just too silly.

The episodes move along quickly mainly because the script is si weak and silly it cannot sustain long conversations.
  • efd-10467
  • 29 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
5/10

I'm glad it's short...

From a magic pen that can hear caller's on a phone, to inept highly trained professionals that can't keep an eye on a boats hatch, there's all manner of idiocy in this show.

I will say, Charlie Cox plays a pretty good part. He's not an outstandingly brilliant actor by any stretch of the imagination, but he's well cast and does his best with the script etc.

Unfortunately, the rest.of the show is subpar spy nonsense with Deus Ex Machinas for every corner they wrote themselves into. It makes for a show you can only really enjoy if you turn logic and rational thought off for a while.

If it had run any longer than it does, I'd have not watched beyond episode 2 because spending 10 or 11 hours with this show would be way way too much.
  • pfne
  • 25 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
6/10

An amateurish espionage mini-series

  • georgybettyabraham
  • 27 déc. 2022
  • Permalien

I had to quit after the first episode

  • andreaspersson9403
  • 6 janv. 2023
  • Permalien
6/10

Kind of like smelling your own fart

Oh this had so much potential to be great, but for me it fell way short of Spooks and Slow Horses, disappointing. Anyway, after two episodes I realised it wasn't going to get any better, but I wanted to know the story and it's the week i between Christmas and NY and I've got nothing else to do.

Most of the acting was good but, again it seems the director didn't get the best out of the talent. The show also seems to have lacked a decent budget in post and particularly in music and editing.

That said, if you want a semi-predictable low budget British, London-based spy movie, then this is perfect.
  • george-09356
  • 27 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
6/10

Makes me angry

  • ldennis64
  • 25 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
6/10

Believe the bad reviews.

This series is neither suspenseful nor a thriller. It seemed like it had potential In the beginning, so I was dubious of the terrible reviews. However this quickly devolved to being the bland and forgettable tripe that seems to have infected all streaming services. This is a very condensed series. It's like they threw every spy thriller cliche and plot twist into a few shows at the expense of character development and pacing, and removed any common sense or logic. The only thing that sets this apart from all the other forgettable shows of this genre is that there aren't nonstop car chases or gunfights. Big snore.
  • ealander
  • 28 janv. 2023
  • Permalien
7/10

Another good spy binge for the holiday season

I was nearly swayed by reviews not to watch this latest offering in a season of good spy yarns - what a mistake that would have been.

Sure it has a handful of procedural errors, but Treason is a very good story nonetheless and won't disappoint people who love this kind of show.

Mostly set in London, and boasting a good international cast, Treason will keep you guessing - its intrigue only slightly diminished when it becomes clear who the final traitor is. But like most good spy yarns there's more to it than simply resting on the shoulders of a whodunnit - how the chips fall at the end is equally as important.

A good holiday binge that should keep viewers entertained.
  • rich-mac
  • 27 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
8/10

Yes, there are some holes in the plot, but ........................

The first couple of episodes of this powerful thriller do contain some holes in the plot - especially about the role of the MI6 agents.

But keep watching: episodes 3 to 5 strengthen the story, which turns into a very gripping thriller, with a reasonable ending.

I am not giving plot lines away by stating that nobody comes out of this story well - not the MI6, the CIA nor the Russians.

The writers and director have kept the plot moving well in later episodes and the actors all performed well. London once again proved to be an outstanding backdrop - leading to a very entertaining series.

I often give Netflix series a low rating of 2 or 3, but my rating of 8 reflects the entertainment value of watching all 5 episodes. Don't follow those who tell you not to bother watching - do so and form your own opinion.
  • ak2020
  • 25 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
7/10

Better than the reviews

I gave it 7 stars. Maybe realistically a 6 but wanted to balance out the stupid ones and twos. I watched all episodes back to back. Kept husband and I intrigued all the way through. Of course there was plot holes, and yes, suspend belief. I'm quite sure this isn't how MI5 or the CIA operate, but it doesn't stop it being a good story. People watch Marvel and can manage to suspend belief and still enjoy it, why so different just because you think it should be.

Excellent acting. Believable characters, even if the wife is annoying for 3 out of the 5 episodes. Fast paced and enjoyable. Give it a go.
  • gailmoir
  • 2 janv. 2023
  • Permalien
1/10

Beyond any logic or reason....

  • marcus-28749
  • 6 janv. 2023
  • Permalien
8/10

Better than I thought

The plot lurched into action with some fairly questionable premises, but I hung around, and it only got better as it went along. It's a spy story with a lot of nasty and corrupt forces that put the protagonists into almost impossible corners. The last half of the series is where it starts to roll. That part has acts of courage and desperation to achieve at least an honorable conclusion to a very messed up situation.

The CIA, MI6, and most of all, the entrenched government bureaucracy that rewards greed and blackmail do not fair well. It's a struggle between decent people caught in a horrible situation, and their all-powerful antagonists who have the system behind them. The protagonists don't come through it unscathed, but it's a satisfying ending, and that's been rather rare of late on Netflix.
  • dbeaton-07996
  • 26 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
7/10

Actually not too bad

I feel that a lot of the armchair-agents out there are giving this show an unfairly low rating. It's not a documentary for heaven's sake - it's a rather entertaining show set w/in the world of espionage and family drama.

Great acting, action is not bad and the plot is pretty engaging. Sure, you have to suspend your sense of what might be 'real' a bit but it's pretty good escapism for a few hours.

I enjoyed it - probably because I set my expecations.

I'd say a 7/10 is a fair rating for this.

I feel that a lot of the armchair-agents out there are giving this show an unfairly low rating. It's not a documentary for heaven's sake - it's a rather entertaining show set w/in the world of espionage and family drama.

Great acting, action is not bad and the plot is pretty engaging. Sure, you have to suspend your sense of what might be 'real' a bit but it's pretty good escapism for a few hours.

I enjoyed it - probably because I set my expecations.

I'd say a 7/10 is a fair rating for this.
  • degrees-33365
  • 26 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
3/10

Farfetched

Find it difficult to believe MI6 boss needs to be and is expected to be home for dinner and to put his kids to bed every night. Ridiculous to see the wife overreacting & dishing to her long lost friend that her husband had to go to a record store at 10:00pm to get a gift for someone when she knows his job probably entails weird, secret behaviors and actions. He's a spy, he does spy stuff. You should know this and not get all upset and jealous when he's on his laptop in the middle of the night. I thought the show looked interesting, but shut it off before end of first episode because too far fetched.
  • ecstapes
  • 28 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
7/10

Engaging spy thriller

So it's not the greatest spy thriller, but once you get past the first couple of episodes it picks up steam and becomes quite gripping. Throwing everything in the pot you have dodgy MI6 higher ups, Russian spies, dodgy CIA operatives, British government corruption, blackmailing, assassins, and various conspiracies. For those moaning don't take it so seriously, it's not James Bond. It was good it was wrapped up in 5 episodes. I actually preferred it to the latest Jack Ryan which is more paint by numbers and quite flat in comparison. I particularly enjoyed Ciaran Hinds as the head of MI6, Oona Chaplin as the number 2's ex military wife and Olga Kurylenko as the Russian agent.
  • jonwoodh
  • 28 déc. 2022
  • Permalien

Engaging Brit Spy Mini-Series

Do you feel ready for a British spy story? Of course you do, and it doesn't disappoint and quite suitable for binge watching with only 5 episodes. Chaplin is great, those expressive eyes! MI6 story with all the usual trappings of scheming for power and a bit of blackmail (kompromat) thrown in. If you were looking for lots of gun battles including "let's get out of here" dialogue you might go elsewhere, (but we do have at least one gun battle/exchange) I would encourage Brit spy or police drama fans to take this one in......... Decent acting, suitably engaging story and I can recommend it without reserve.
  • Imdboost
  • 3 janv. 2023
  • Permalien
6/10

Not a very believable story line. Too many cliches. Still the pace was good.

While the pace of the story is good and keeps one engaged, the plot is not very believable.

I like Charlie Cox (from Daredevil series) and he fits the role well, I think the character itself was quite shallow, like most other characters. Can't believe how stupidly and illogically some of the characters behave (especially Charlie's ex-Army wife).

The CIA has unlimited ability to operate inside the UK? Not a likely scenario.

I wonder if there will be a sequel as someone actually got away with murder.

The surprise in the series was Olga, who actually put in a decent performance despite a weak character/role. Ciaran Hinds puts in a decent performance.

Overall it seemed that they wanted to finish the series quickly and tried to wrap it up without much buildup. The ending fell flat in my opinion, despite the one shock event that seemed forced in.
  • TeamGadar
  • 30 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
6/10

Moderately entertaining; but not especially plausible

It's not a bad way to kill a few hours. I've spent countless time on worse. It's is entertaining for sure, plenty of action and less of the classic spy drama. More Bourne like than Tinker Tailor, plenty of action and excitement. But it's painfully implausible; just way too much happens way too quickly. Not to mention some painful gaps in plot. It turns the spy agency thriller le Carre made famous and serialises it into something a touch too cartoonish.

Nevertheless, if you need some time to kill - you could for sure do worse and there is something in it for him and her. Not a bad date night choice.
  • Worldstoughest
  • 27 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
7/10

recommended espionage thriller

If the first episode is found even slightly interesting? I strongly recommend a complete watch through all five episodes. The pace and entertainment is a bit up and down though the majority of the full arc, but a really good final episode completes this mini-series. It's pretty unusual (unfortunately) when the final episode is the best part of any TV show, so this series gets some added merit from this viewer. There is a chance that this story could be continued, as the ending is left open in many ways, but even if that isn't the case, Treason is complete in this single run.

I'd say the first episode foreshadows a big plot twist, just by the nature of the genre - which would be a spin off of a government agency thriller. Anyone who as seen enough of this type of story expects treachery, intrigue and unexpected outcomes. Which is a little ironic if you think about it... But! Treason keeps it pretty fresh with some (truly) unexpected outcomes, that unfold in interesting ways.

And what is Treason? Basically we, the viewers begin with a high ranking MI-6 member who is thrust into intrigue when his superior, the MI-6 highest ranking official, is the victim of a targeted attack. Hijinks ensues, and we learn all about Adam Lawrence, his history in MI-6, his family, friends, and life in general. There are aspects of this show that are painfully easy to spoil, so I recommend Not doing a lot of research - just watch the first episode, and go from there.

I think Treason could been truly great had the five part script been scrutinized and refined. Honestly, too much of the content is just normal life stuff - which I think is very intentional to ground the show, characters and family that are presented. But to be honest, the two kids are boring characters that add nothing to the shows entertainment (I think they were intended to feel like main characters, but end up drifting into plot device/periphery territory). The three main characters are well fleshed out, but... why not make them even more epic? With greater accomplishments (or shame) in their history? The three main characters are interesting, but I think the writers missed an opportunity to make all three unforgettable type characters, and instead? They are merely good, likable characters. There are a small handful of additional characters that all serve their purpose, but they too are pretty thin in terms of development. My biggest critique of Treason would be all character development, that really could put this show over the top, but instead feels... just serviceable.

So really good TV show, but not great - and! If these actors want to continue these roles? And producers/production in place? They could still really up their backstory in a new series, and have a lot of fun with these established characters. I'd like to see that.
  • urthpainter
  • 6 janv. 2023
  • Permalien
9/10

Pure entertainment

Several reviews slammed this for not being realistic. It is FICTION. It is entertainment. It's a great easy to follow story with enough twist turns and red herrings to keep me going through five episodes. It's not a brain twister and there are holes in the plot. But there are few movies or series without a hole or three. Looking for something easy to watch while your brain is on overload? This is a good choice for that. And it can be watched with all ages to boot. No nudity very light on harsh language and no blood and guts being slung all about. Ignore the petty reviews who expect perfection.
  • kellyjtmorgan
  • 28 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
7/10

Cox and Chaplin aren't enough

If I had to summarise this miniseries, I'd call it a an entertainingly missed potential.

It becomes clearly from the onset that the premise is awesome and could easily use an expanded series to treat various details with the care they deserve. Otherwise, the story gets put on so much fast forward that the suspension of disbelief required to enjoy the more palatable plot points can easily be seen as insurmountable to many. For me it worked as a decided to write off weaker writing points to cliches required to bring this closer to today's audience (keeping to close to the likes of "Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy" would make it a bit tedious).

All in all it's watchable and the plot itself is even surprisingly smart given the lacking implementation. The acting is great (Hinds, Cox and Chaplin carry it with gumption).

What killed it for me in the end was the fast-fire Deux-ex-machina moments thrown in the end (the identity of some double agent thought to have put in motion the plot years before the timeline of the series is served on a platter with no details linked to the reveal - it's just spat out - the idea itself would have been brilliant had it been an expanded subplot of an extended series).

That's Netflix for you ....
  • andrei-dascalu-eng
  • 25 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
3/10

When I Gave Up

  • andrewrye-06535
  • 9 janv. 2023
  • Permalien
8/10

Actually quite good

It starts off feeling a bit 'same old hashed story' but by episode 3 it starts to get very interesting with a couple of unexpected plot twists.

There are plot holes and it does take a little of bit of reality suspension at times, but worth sticking with it.

The London backdrop is fab, the acting isn't bad, the story is fun with some unexpected turns and whole series ends wrapped up neatly. A nice change to some of the mediocre Netflix series which end with plot strands dangling everywhere with the hope of a second commission.

It's a good evenings viewing, I'm not sure why there are so many strongly negative reviews. It really isn't that bad!
  • nicolasmattick
  • 26 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
6/10

Besides for the wife

  • eriscloset
  • 31 déc. 2022
  • Permalien
2/10

Who Wrote This Rubbish?

Sadly the same guy (Matt Charman) who wrote the brilliant 'Bridge of Spies!'

It seems everything Netflix touches turns to dreck. They have the reverse Midas Touch.

I am a big fan of both Charley Cox and Ciarán Hinds, but the Sophomoric dialogue and film-school plot lines swamp them right out of the gate. A couple of bumblers manage to come up with a plan that involves walking right into a posh private club, putting on an apron, serving a drink to the Head of MI6 and no one asks: "Who the bloody Hell are you?" Then it goes straight downhill from there.

I was looking forward to a taught, intelligent, clever spy caper and instead I got 'Treason,' which is what this series should be charged with.
  • DJM26
  • 26 déc. 2022
  • Permalien

En savoir plus sur ce titre

Découvrir

Récemment consultés

Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
Obtenir l'application IMDb
Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
Obtenir l'application IMDb
Pour Android et iOS
Obtenir l'application IMDb
  • Aide
  • Index du site
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Licence de données IMDb
  • Salle de presse
  • Annonces
  • Emplois
  • Conditions d'utilisation
  • Politique de confidentialité
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, une société Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.