La série suit Catherine Ravenscroft, une journaliste documentaire de télévision dont le travail a consisté à révéler les transgressions d'institutions respectées de longue date.La série suit Catherine Ravenscroft, une journaliste documentaire de télévision dont le travail a consisté à révéler les transgressions d'institutions respectées de longue date.La série suit Catherine Ravenscroft, une journaliste documentaire de télévision dont le travail a consisté à révéler les transgressions d'institutions respectées de longue date.
- Nommé pour 2 Primetime Emmys
- 2 victoires et 24 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
Never read the book, so judging the series as a standalone. The series is way too long, stretched way too much. It was intriguing and mysterious for the first few episodes, but by episode five, I was like, "Oh my god, just conclude it already.". Catherine's silence/constantly being interrupt while trying to tell her side feels like just a plot mechanism to keep the story going. Clearly setting up for a "twist".
The constant, detailed sex scenes are just ew. Literally porn. I don't mind sex scenes, but if I want to watch "detailed" sex scenes that last ten minutes, my first choice for that would not be Apple TV+.
The constant, detailed sex scenes are just ew. Literally porn. I don't mind sex scenes, but if I want to watch "detailed" sex scenes that last ten minutes, my first choice for that would not be Apple TV+.
Some of the negative reviews seem to suggest the good reviews are a "conspiracy", unable to grasp the simple concept that we all have different tastes.
There are plot holes for sure, but the story hits you hard when you realize every character is a despicable human being, and you see the horrible cruelty, ego, and hate that fester in the human psyche. It's well acted, and the story develops impressively.
The 7/10 score reflects the plot holes, all the things that happened between Katherine and Jonathan were only witnessed by them, yet somehow the grieving mother wrote it up as if she saw every moment, and then it just became fact in the show.
But it is powerful, the emotions it instills, the wonderful way you catch yourself feeling sorry for one of the characters, only to realize they are despicable.
Well worth a watch (I am not a bot or an employee of the production company in case any conspiracy theorists are here).....(that's what THEY would say!!)
There are plot holes for sure, but the story hits you hard when you realize every character is a despicable human being, and you see the horrible cruelty, ego, and hate that fester in the human psyche. It's well acted, and the story develops impressively.
The 7/10 score reflects the plot holes, all the things that happened between Katherine and Jonathan were only witnessed by them, yet somehow the grieving mother wrote it up as if she saw every moment, and then it just became fact in the show.
But it is powerful, the emotions it instills, the wonderful way you catch yourself feeling sorry for one of the characters, only to realize they are despicable.
Well worth a watch (I am not a bot or an employee of the production company in case any conspiracy theorists are here).....(that's what THEY would say!!)
Disclaimer" on Apple TV+ is a must-watch! The lighting and cinematography work beautifully together to create an immersive atmosphere that draws you in with every scene. The acting from the entire cast is stellar-each performance is nuanced and engaging, bringing depth to the complex storylines. A visually captivating and well-acted show that keeps you hooked from start to finish!
What truly sets "Disclaimer" apart is the seamless blend of tension and emotion throughout the series. The direction allows the characters to shine in moments of vulnerability, while the carefully crafted visuals enhance the storytelling. The lighting shifts effortlessly between dramatic and subtle, adding layers to the unfolding narrative. The cinematography is a standout, capturing both intimate close-ups and sweeping, atmospheric shots that heighten the suspense. Combined with an outstanding cast that delivers raw and powerful performances, this series is a masterclass in storytelling and visual artistry. A true gem on Apple TV+.
What truly sets "Disclaimer" apart is the seamless blend of tension and emotion throughout the series. The direction allows the characters to shine in moments of vulnerability, while the carefully crafted visuals enhance the storytelling. The lighting shifts effortlessly between dramatic and subtle, adding layers to the unfolding narrative. The cinematography is a standout, capturing both intimate close-ups and sweeping, atmospheric shots that heighten the suspense. Combined with an outstanding cast that delivers raw and powerful performances, this series is a masterclass in storytelling and visual artistry. A true gem on Apple TV+.
Dang! I was not aware of the experience I was in for when I started screening this AppleTV+ limited series starring Cate Blanchett and Kevin Kline. "Disclaimer" is based on a novel of the same name by Renée Knight, and it was written for the screen and directed by Alfonso Cuarón. At its core, this is a revenge story. Blanchett stars as Catherine, a journalist whose secrets of her past resurface in an alarming way, causing her to confront that past as it wreaks havoc on her entire life. This was a masterfully told story, taking us along a fascinating journey of discovery as the audience is shown (sometimes in vivid detail) the "events" of Catherine's past. Blanchett, as always, is fantastic in here and Kline puts in a solid performance as well. It was surprising to see Sacha Baron Cohen in a more serious role, but he did it justice. Despite a couple/few minor nitpicks, I highly recommend this series if you like character dramas with some added tension/intrigue. Note: There are some pretty graphic depictions of sex/intimacy shown throughout various episodes. This isn't action-packed, and it did take about half an episode (roughly 30 minutes) before I eventually got "hooked" onto the story. But boy am I glad I stuck around. Video review to come shortly.
After an intriguing start Disclaimer quickly becomes a collection of plotholes and unlikely behaviour, beautifully sown together by a great director. Unfortunately. Cuarón did not only direct the series, but also wrote the scenario. After a few episodes it just becomes annoying to see so many unrealistic events and reactions unfolding.
But as you know there much be some plot twist somewhere you hang in there to the last episode, only to be confronted with not only disturbing events but also a ending that tops all previous episodes in its level of unbelievability.
In contrast, the filming is extremely good. Cuarón knows what he is doing and uses all the tricks in his book to create great looking scenes.
.
But as you know there much be some plot twist somewhere you hang in there to the last episode, only to be confronted with not only disturbing events but also a ending that tops all previous episodes in its level of unbelievability.
In contrast, the filming is extremely good. Cuarón knows what he is doing and uses all the tricks in his book to create great looking scenes.
.
The 77th Emmys Acting Nominees in Character
The 77th Emmys Acting Nominees in Character
Check out our gallery of the nominees in the leading and supporting acting categories.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn a 2024 interview with The Playlist, Alfonso Cuarón spoke about how the 2 lead parts were cast: "When I was writing the screenplay, I thought of Cate Blanchett. I could only see Cate while I was writing. Luckily, Cate got involved in the project very early on. I finished the script and sent it to her. She agreed to do it, and then she became my creative partner. She was part of it, involved in every creative decision we made, all the way through the end of the show, including casting. She was the one who called me once we were discussing who could play Steven. She called and said, 'I'm just walking out of a dinner, and we were laughing and talking about Un poisson nommé Wanda (1988)' And I instantly said, 'Wait, do you mean Kevin Kline for the part?' She said, 'Yes, Kevin,' and that was how the idea of Kevin came through. So I contacted Kevin, and he was kind of a bit surprised, intrigued, and daunted, but he accepted it. Remember something: Kevin is an American actor, and he was playing a very specific British man, right?"
- GaffesIn multiple episodes, Jonathon uses the same lens throughout the series, a medium length telephoto. Such a lens would be incapable of focusing on close-in subjects such as selfies with Sasha or in the bedroom with Catherine.
- ConnexionsFeatured in The 77th Primetime Emmy Awards (2025)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Barcha tasodiflar tasodifiy emas
- Lieux de tournage
- Forte dei Marmi, Lucca, Tuscany, Italie(location / exteriors - beach scenes)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 49min
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant