Finally Caught

Série télévisée
2022–

NOTE IMDb

MA NOTE

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueEach story begins with a murder and an unsuccessful investigation. But with passing time new evidence comes to light, science evolves allowing law enforcement to piece together what happened... Tout lireEach story begins with a murder and an unsuccessful investigation. But with passing time new evidence comes to light, science evolves allowing law enforcement to piece together what happened, with the killer being Finally Caught.Each story begins with a murder and an unsuccessful investigation. But with passing time new evidence comes to light, science evolves allowing law enforcement to piece together what happened, with the killer being Finally Caught.

Casting principal

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

NOTE IMDb

5,8/10

120

MA NOTE

Casting principal

37avis d'utilisateurs

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

Épisodes86

Parcourir les épisodes

HautLes mieux notés6 saisons4 ans

Photos

Rôles principaux99+

Modifier

Scott Magnus

Self - Expert…

• 2022–2025

Ethan Pollock

Self - Expert

• 2024–2025

Natalie Bell

Self - Expert…

• 2024–2025

Jeff Hamilton

Self

• 2024

Jill Macyshon

Self - Expert

• 2025

Dean Cooper

Narrator

• 2025

Nicole Dube

Self - Expert

• 2025

Ali SinClaire

Self - Expert

• 2025

Craig Donnelly

Narrator…

• 2022–2024

Chelsea Suderman

Self

• 2022–2024

Christine Hannah

Self…

• 2022–2024

Kristin Bibik

Self

• 2022–2024

Jacob Stoller

Self

• 2022–2024

Ali St. Claire

Self

• 2024

Gord Leclerc

Self

• 2022–2023

Hank Koreman

Investigator…

• 2022–2025

Emilie Morier-Roy

Investigator…

• 2022–2024

Collin Wynter

Bart Corbin…

• 2022–2025

Avis des utilisateurs37

5,8120

Avis à la une

5buffordmydog

Christine, health problem?

I came on here to figure out why the forensic specialist on the show sounds breathless and like her breath is being forced out. I haven't found any answers, but I agree with several other posters. Her manner of speaking distracts from the information she is conveying. It's an interesting show, but hard to listen to.

I like the details that they reveal and the show's overall format. However, some of the reinactments are clearly low budget. The episode featuring Thomas Mitchell has some terrible props. Judith Flagg is carrying a bundle with a horrible quality wig sticking out the top and it's meant to be her 8-month-old son.

5Lijoh1

Interesting stories..unnecessary expert fillers

Good stories.. true crime lovers may not be familiar with some of them which helps because I feel like I've seen them all at this point. However, the seemingly Canadian "experts" and journalists are completely unnecessary and off putting. There's a narrator, no need for 5 other people to narrate. One young female expert has so much pep in her voice as she talks about murder. The worst is the forensic expert. Her breathy voice is cringy and distracting. I hope she's okay. She sounds like someone is forcing her to read from a script after punching her in the chest. I'll continue to watch only because I'm interested in the stories.

tabanyana

Love the show but.....

How in the world was Christine Hannah selected to have a speaking role on this show? Simply horrible! Sounds like she has a mouthful of marbles. Combine that with zero personality behind what she says and I cringe when she speaks! Surely there were other choices. I have seen her on a few other shows and didn't understand it then. There are many other narrators on the show that speak beautiful and do not hurt the overall flow this otherwise good show.

If she is paid for this narration whatever she receives is too much. I am sure there are iewers that could do a better job and appear for free, in case the budget is the issue!

4user-149-858374

Maybe subtitles for Christine Hannah??

It's a great show, but perhaps subtitles for Christine Hannah might make her lines more understandable. She speaks as though she doesn't have enough air to finish her words or sentences. This makes it difficult to understand her. This is not a criticism of her, but perhaps she needs help to allow the viewers to get what she's trying to communicate. I often have to rewind to find out what she is saying.

Otherwise, the show is intriguing, well-delivered, thoughtful (especially to the families of the victims), and.pertinent to this day and age. There are lessons in this series for everyone. It is not a sensational series, yet it is informative.

3jeffkresse-814-345969

Good Storyline but Expert Sinks It

So-called expert Christine Hannah ruins the show. If she is an "expert" you can add being a boring expert at reading on camera, never looking at it, and even misarticulating a few words here and there. The producers of this series had a good concept but i don't know why they didn't pull this commentator. A crash test dummy has more personality and character after it impacts the test wall than this person. I thing single-handedly she tanked the show and there are no more seasons.

Also, after returning from every commercial break, they recap events for two to three minutes, which just fills time needlessly and makes it even more ploddingly boring.

Histoire

Modifier

Le saviez-vous

Modifier

Anecdotes
This is among a group of real crime shows that feature certain "experts" talking about details of the crimes depicted, as if they were really involved in the cases. But it's the same "experts" talking about cases from all different places and times, so obviously none of them really were involved in any and are just reading from a script. Jeff Hamilton is the worst at reading scripts and pretending it's his experience.