Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA young woman reawakens evil forces in a house a notorious crime occurred.A young woman reawakens evil forces in a house a notorious crime occurred.A young woman reawakens evil forces in a house a notorious crime occurred.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Aviva Baumann
- Grisdale Actress
- (as Aviva)
John Roderick Davidson
- Grisdale Actor
- (as John R. Davidson)
Nicole Rayburn
- Behind the scenes interviewer
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
This is just a repeat of what others have been saying. It's just completely awful!! The actors suck, the writing sucked and I am personally offended that they can even say this is based from a true story. With the exception of the monologue at the beginning and a few hints to the actual Borden story check out the 1975 movie called The Legend of Lizzie Borden. I guess my only question is why is this a $1.20 from Redbox and can I get my money back? I know a few producers who could make a great documentary on this particular event and it be one of the best things you've seen
ever
where are you Phil and Christopher Saint Booth when we need something decent and recent for this story???
This movie must rank way up there as the worst ever. Haven't seen such bad acting, bad continuity, bad special effects, bad storyline...EVER. Why did anyone bother to make this film? What a waste of time, money and effort. I have never written a film review before as i never really felt strongly enough about one but this angered me to the extent that i must warn others not to spend their hard earned cash to sit through this poor excuse for a movie. It offers absolutely no entertainment value whatsoever. It got to the point where i was laughing at the ham-fisted acting, which really didn't take that long to be honest. There should be a 'no star' option for this flick. or maybe they should put in an option for 'minus stars'. If there was, this would get the maximum minus available.
Cannot agree with several other reviews.
For me, sorry to say, this is just a poorly made movie. Got very tired of the many cut-away scenes, many, just not cogent.
I do not mind watching movies just for some mindless fun and passing time. But, this was really wasting time. I rarely turn a movie off, just hoping it might show some promise by the end...sad to say, this one just kept going downward.
Promising premise, but never delivered.
Acting was poor. Felt the writing and editing poor. Some scenes outright laughable and not in a good way.
For me, sorry to say, this is just a poorly made movie. Got very tired of the many cut-away scenes, many, just not cogent.
I do not mind watching movies just for some mindless fun and passing time. But, this was really wasting time. I rarely turn a movie off, just hoping it might show some promise by the end...sad to say, this one just kept going downward.
Promising premise, but never delivered.
Acting was poor. Felt the writing and editing poor. Some scenes outright laughable and not in a good way.
I've been through the reviews, all of which do a fitting job of explaining just how horrible this movie is; I only wish I'd thought to read the reviews before I rented it. All I want to know is.... what the ¥<&¿ Did we just watch? Is there anyone out there, that has seen the movie (avoid it at all costs) who can explain what it was about. Was there a plot, a story line, anything... that can fulfill my desire to understand what we just wasted $4.and two hours on. Don't fall into the trap, if it is ever suggested that one should watch this movie... make an appointment to have a root canal without anaesthesia... as that would be far less painful than sitting through this... what exactly would one call this? I don't feel comfortable calling it a movie.
Not the worst movie you could see, but this one suffers greatly from what appears to be execution issues. A pretty good cast is highly underutilized, the effects mostly fall under "should be good enough", the dialog is borderline awful, there are a host of continuation errors and so on. Really just seems like a good idea came up and the execution on that idea was left to chance, a good lesson on the importance of proper and thorough planning I guess. The bright spot is Shawna Waldron as Maggie who really showed talent despite what was obviously a flawed productions. She even made the poorly written dialog work and made the most and then some of what she had to work with. With the interesting premise and given cast it would be interesting to see what better execution could produce. As far as the look of the film that's more a matter of personal taste, I found it to be a bit to flat for my liking, but it doesn't take anything away from the film.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesWhen the cable guy is working on the television, the cameraman is reflected in the TV screen.
- ConnexionsReferenced in The Tonight Show with Jay Leno: Épisode #20.159 (2012)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Lizzie?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 26min(86 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant