Gray
- Série télévisée
- 2023–
NOTE IMDb
6,0/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Cornelia Gray, une espionne de la CIA, revient du froid après avoir passé 20 ans dans la clandestinité, évitant les agents du gouvernement qui la soupçonnaient d'être une traîtresse.Cornelia Gray, une espionne de la CIA, revient du froid après avoir passé 20 ans dans la clandestinité, évitant les agents du gouvernement qui la soupçonnaient d'être une traîtresse.Cornelia Gray, une espionne de la CIA, revient du froid après avoir passé 20 ans dans la clandestinité, évitant les agents du gouvernement qui la soupçonnaient d'être une traîtresse.
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
This has good potential and a good premise with a spy coming back from self imposed exile to find a mole but then it goes downhill fast.
The flawed characters all lie constantly and undermine each other. They are also just plain weird but I did love Tag's house and guest house.
It is hard to identify with Cornelia because we never see who she really is and she is just weird. The way she constantly touches people is just strange and the aging femme fatale angle is creepy.
If you like answers... Don't bother watching because the answers are not there. It isn't even a cliffhanger. Just dragging things out.
The flawed characters all lie constantly and undermine each other. They are also just plain weird but I did love Tag's house and guest house.
It is hard to identify with Cornelia because we never see who she really is and she is just weird. The way she constantly touches people is just strange and the aging femme fatale angle is creepy.
If you like answers... Don't bother watching because the answers are not there. It isn't even a cliffhanger. Just dragging things out.
Such potential, a great story premise, a bit of inspiration from Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. But the acting stinks, along with costumes (spot the terrible wig), crappy accent from Rupert and a miserly budget. I don't think the actors can be blamed because there's some quality in here, except for the Derek Zoolander wannabe, he is just terrible.
The casting of Rupert Everett is weird. He's better than this but seems horribly miscast in this case, straining his voice to hide a terrible American accent.
It's got a 4 for the story but everything else drags it down. I'll still watch it but it could've been so much better.
The casting of Rupert Everett is weird. He's better than this but seems horribly miscast in this case, straining his voice to hide a terrible American accent.
It's got a 4 for the story but everything else drags it down. I'll still watch it but it could've been so much better.
Its just not believable this waspy grandmother is the CIAs only option to root out a mole, and the lack of action is needed as it would be doubly unbelievable if the main character could do anything if any action or violence arose. Clarkson's narrow range on full and tedious display - the troubled neurotic she seems to push in every role she plays is just not believable as a rare and insightful operative . Dialogue is dull, little tension, weak secondary acting with with minimal subplot and a tedious been there done that main plot. The 6/10 reviews it seems to be getting say it all - Ive taught screenwriting at college - this is hard to watch and I gave up eventually.
Well, I hardly think you're able to call this a thriller, as surely that requires some thrills. This definitely has...none. It's bland and boring, and so incredibly slow. Glaciers move quicker than the plot pacing here!
I'm all for talkie dramas, but the dialogue needs to be able to stand up. This script falls down 90% off the time, leaving seasoned actors looking amateurish at best, incompetent at worst.
I'm not sure the dreadful mis-casting helped matters either. Patricia Clarkson (usually a favourite of mine) was as wooden as spoon, with about as much depth. But by far the strangest casting was Rupert Everetts'. I have to ask if his character was supposed to be comedic? Because, we'll...Honestly! I couldn't believe who I was watching, and how badly he was performing.
If it is renewed, I will not be tuning in.
I'm all for talkie dramas, but the dialogue needs to be able to stand up. This script falls down 90% off the time, leaving seasoned actors looking amateurish at best, incompetent at worst.
I'm not sure the dreadful mis-casting helped matters either. Patricia Clarkson (usually a favourite of mine) was as wooden as spoon, with about as much depth. But by far the strangest casting was Rupert Everetts'. I have to ask if his character was supposed to be comedic? Because, we'll...Honestly! I couldn't believe who I was watching, and how badly he was performing.
If it is renewed, I will not be tuning in.
You'd think a show about a former spy coming in from the cold and helping hunt down a mole would be action packed. But you would be wrong. Over the course of the (first and likely only) season there was surprisingly little action in this series. And I don't just mean action in terms of fight scenes or car chases. I mean very little actually *happens* in this show. The lack of action is especially surprising given that there were several plot lines that could have been further explored or developed but that were needlessly left unresolved at the end of eight episodes. I'm not sure if this was meant as setup for a second season, but given how underwhelming the first season was, I can't imagine watching a second. On the plus side, the performances were strong and it's always nice to see Patricia Clarkson, Rupert Everett, and Lydia West. They just deserve better writing.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Gray have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant