NOTE IMDb
3,0/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Dans ce film catastrophe, une météore géante entre en orbite autour de la Terre et commence à se désintégrer, inondant la planète de débris toxiques.Dans ce film catastrophe, une météore géante entre en orbite autour de la Terre et commence à se désintégrer, inondant la planète de débris toxiques.Dans ce film catastrophe, une météore géante entre en orbite autour de la Terre et commence à se désintégrer, inondant la planète de débris toxiques.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Ben L. Daniels
- Stratcom North Atlantic
- (as Ben Daniels)
Avis à la une
This film is so bad I had to watch it all the way through, the effects, I have avoided the word special on purpose, are hilarious, there will never be enough hours in the day to describe how bad this film is. The leading lady idea of acting was to pant more when she was out of breadth. Loosing a few pounds of her hips would not have done any damage. As for the leading man, he would be wise to seek work as a stunt double for Daniel Craig. The cheapness of the sets are beyond belief, most of the central part of the film appear to have been shot over a weekend on a disused factory lot. The bit at the end when the hero is looking for his family and the mountain off screen is "attacked" by the meteors is really funny I won't mention the ending but it's so bad it's good and what happened to his traveling companion. Priceless.
Can't defend the script or the dialog, but much of the acting in this sci-fi disaster flick is first- rate, especially if you watch the special features and realize they shot this thing in only 12 days. Joe Lando and Cooper Harris, in particular, do exceptional work under what must have been trying conditions. Lando brings a real sense of desperation and urgency and Harris is compelling as a lost soul along for the ride. They even manage to make some of the horrendous dialog sound human and real. It's a shame they didn't have a better script to work with, but they and one or two others in the cast are well worth watching.
This film is terrible in so many ways. Poorly acted, horrible direction, a plot line where the characters do ridiculous things.
But all that has been covered in other reviews here. What mystifies me is that this was released by a company called "Faith Films", with the DVD cover quoting Revelations, talking about a biblical prophecy and the End Times. None of that is mentioned in the film! There is one brief mention of going to church early in the movie, and later there is a pastor that helps some people. Those are not strong plot points, not highlighted or emphasized in any way. So what does "faith" have to do with this silly disaster movie? Nothing.
I tried to go to the Faith Films web site, and my anti-virus software blocked it, saying it may contain scam material. That could be a false blockage, but it kind of fits, considering the film really has nothing to do with Christianity, in spite of the DVD cover indicating otherwise. I guess that is a scam, too.
Anyway, the film is only worth watching if you want to mock how bad it is. For example, when the main character ends up in the desert for no particular reason. What?
But all that has been covered in other reviews here. What mystifies me is that this was released by a company called "Faith Films", with the DVD cover quoting Revelations, talking about a biblical prophecy and the End Times. None of that is mentioned in the film! There is one brief mention of going to church early in the movie, and later there is a pastor that helps some people. Those are not strong plot points, not highlighted or emphasized in any way. So what does "faith" have to do with this silly disaster movie? Nothing.
I tried to go to the Faith Films web site, and my anti-virus software blocked it, saying it may contain scam material. That could be a false blockage, but it kind of fits, considering the film really has nothing to do with Christianity, in spite of the DVD cover indicating otherwise. I guess that is a scam, too.
Anyway, the film is only worth watching if you want to mock how bad it is. For example, when the main character ends up in the desert for no particular reason. What?
From looking at the DVD box, I decided not to watch Meteor Apocalypse as a film, but as a simple story about a man trying to find his family in difficult times. I put the cheap special effects, bad acting and script aside, and just waited to see what would happen next.
It reminded me a lot of the recent BBC series Survivors, except every 20 minutes there are meteors raining down on everyone.
The main character of David is played to good effect by Joe Lando, giving us a surprisingly good portrayal as the courageous man does his best to find his family and help people along the way. I was pleasantly surprised to see Claudia Christian appear as David's wife and mother to their child. I had not seen her in anything since the end of the Babylon 5 series.
Some things don't quite make sense, but when we are regularly shown conflict within the disaster management center, it may explain why some things occurred.
Not to be taken too seriously, but as a light contribution to the disaster science fiction genre.
It reminded me a lot of the recent BBC series Survivors, except every 20 minutes there are meteors raining down on everyone.
The main character of David is played to good effect by Joe Lando, giving us a surprisingly good portrayal as the courageous man does his best to find his family and help people along the way. I was pleasantly surprised to see Claudia Christian appear as David's wife and mother to their child. I had not seen her in anything since the end of the Babylon 5 series.
Some things don't quite make sense, but when we are regularly shown conflict within the disaster management center, it may explain why some things occurred.
Not to be taken too seriously, but as a light contribution to the disaster science fiction genre.
Strange how there are so many really bad disaster movies around. "Meteor Apocalypse" ranks right up there with the bad ones.
Initially, I had no expectations to the movie, and rightly so, otherwise I would be sorely disappointed.
The story of this movie is ridiculous and often incoherent. There are so many things and scenes that does not make sense and just makes go "alrighty then..." I am sure the director meant well enough with his movie, but it just didn't come together as a greater unity. "Meteor Apocalypse" was doomed right from the very first minute, already there it was incoherent and downright stupid.
The CGI effects in "Meteor Apocalypse" are bad, though not the worst I have seen, so that got to count for some, at least.
Some might find it enjoyable if you got nothing better to do, and just want some mindless way to pass an hour and a half. Expect nothing from this movie, and disable your brain if you are going to watch this movie.
The plus in this movie is that not all of the acting is all that crappy.
Sad that so many disaster movies are well-intended, but fail to deliver.
Initially, I had no expectations to the movie, and rightly so, otherwise I would be sorely disappointed.
The story of this movie is ridiculous and often incoherent. There are so many things and scenes that does not make sense and just makes go "alrighty then..." I am sure the director meant well enough with his movie, but it just didn't come together as a greater unity. "Meteor Apocalypse" was doomed right from the very first minute, already there it was incoherent and downright stupid.
The CGI effects in "Meteor Apocalypse" are bad, though not the worst I have seen, so that got to count for some, at least.
Some might find it enjoyable if you got nothing better to do, and just want some mindless way to pass an hour and a half. Expect nothing from this movie, and disable your brain if you are going to watch this movie.
The plus in this movie is that not all of the acting is all that crappy.
Sad that so many disaster movies are well-intended, but fail to deliver.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesMeteor trails are either parallel or radiant. The meteor trails depicted in this movie could never occur in nature.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Monster Man: Seeing Double/Pilot (2012)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 28min(88 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant