Recherchant vengeance et justice, Cole Brandt se rend dans une ville sans foi ni loi, Dead River. Là, il se met au service de la protection d'un saloon et d'une magnifique femme...Recherchant vengeance et justice, Cole Brandt se rend dans une ville sans foi ni loi, Dead River. Là, il se met au service de la protection d'un saloon et d'une magnifique femme...Recherchant vengeance et justice, Cole Brandt se rend dans une ville sans foi ni loi, Dead River. Là, il se met au service de la protection d'un saloon et d'une magnifique femme...
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Dan Buran
- Tug O'Dell
- (as Daniel Buran)
Veronica Milagros
- Dulce de la Rosa
- (as Veronica Diaz)
Robert Jensen
- Clay Stobbs
- (as Rob Jensen)
Allison O'Malley
- Cassey May
- (as Allison Gordon)
Audrey Ann Gambach
- Josie Belle
- (as Audrey Gambach)
Lou Pimber
- Johnny Brown
- (as Luis Pimber)
Avis à la une
What a crap movie, they bring Peter Coyote to acting 20 minutes or so in hope to hook the attention to the audience, bad move, the picture doesn't uphold by itself, the premise is really insane , the Town is made by brand new woods, pine cheapest wood, the special effects on gunfire is outrageous laughable, we clearly see the blasters some sparkers, as it were possible, the villain Travis McCain is too malign that damage his own merchandise, in this case his prostitutes, provide under awful screenplay the picture survives just the charismatic Cole Brent in a convincing an reliable acting, anyway al rimainder is totally wasting of time, be warning!!
Resume:
First watch: 2019 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 4
Resume:
First watch: 2019 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 4
If not for the language this looks exactly like a network TV show. The indoor scenes are way over-lit and even the fade to black scene breaks are expectant of a commercial.
The good-guy is cool but a bit over polite and the bad guy is menacing although much of his evil deeds are either verbal or off screen. There is plenty of death by gun, but no squibs or suffering.
Stealing the show is the lovable whore who you can't help but want to help. The supporting cast overall is unremarkable, flat, and uninspiring and most of the drama is delivered "by the book".
The four years later ending is straight out of a weak movie of the week, but despite all this it is watchable if not want-able.
The good-guy is cool but a bit over polite and the bad guy is menacing although much of his evil deeds are either verbal or off screen. There is plenty of death by gun, but no squibs or suffering.
Stealing the show is the lovable whore who you can't help but want to help. The supporting cast overall is unremarkable, flat, and uninspiring and most of the drama is delivered "by the book".
The four years later ending is straight out of a weak movie of the week, but despite all this it is watchable if not want-able.
I was really impressed with the overall quality of this little gem. It's hard to make a western these days, especially on an independent film budget. Director Dustin Rikert pulls it off with aplomb! Interesting shots and snappy pacing keep your eyes glued to the screen. It really feels hot and dusty like a good western should. Some great sets and production design. Fine performances all around by the cast, and some excellent stunt work. Fans of the genre won't be disappointed. It's a fun story with classic western elements and is well worth your time. Good escapist fare. Makes me want to see more independent film makers take a shot at a truly under represented tradition in modern cinema. Grab a bag of popcorn and enjoy.
It was great to see a lower budget movie produced with attention to quality actors, quality costuming, quality sets, and even quality music. Yes the movie has some issues typical of a lower budget. You see sporadic problems with continuity and editing. And a few boo-boos with stunts and lighting. But those are sporadic. There's nothing so glaring to make you want to turn it off. The vision is clear from the beginning and despite a few oopsies it's a decent movie. I only wish the DVD cover floating around on Facebook had been used instead of the retro-art modern looking outlaw. At least you'd know what kind of western you are going to view (action and romance and morals)instead of a martial arts testosterone action only flick.
OK. Let me explain. This was such a good attempt. Some money's been spent, (not on the script, admittedly). It's been spent on some decent sets, a few actors, some (occasionally decent) cinematography.
And in these days, a straightforward Good-v-Evil western is refreshing, or, rather, SHOULD BE refreshing. And this tries hard. And (sadly) fails.
The storyline is OK, derivative, but modernised, and - well - OK, what can I say, it's just alright.
The acting's OK, pretty good, in parts. The hero, well, he's a hero. We are in NO DOUBT that he's a good guy.
The women are - well, women, really. The strong mother is OK, ('til the end bit, where she mainly screams and doesn't shoot anything), but mainly the women are pretty 2 dimensional, apart from the one who has so much plastic in her lips she looks like she has her mouth on upside down, and she disappears from the story in a really unconvincing way.
Oh, I don't know. I wanted to like this. I watched it to the end, (Parenthood meets Mum's Apple Pie), and I'm not left with an AWFUL taste in my mouth, just a bitter disappointment. It should have been better.
OK. To be honest? If the producer had hired a decent director, it would have been better.
And he also should have spent a few dollars on someone to direct his fight scenes. That last one is pretty bad.
But, OK, I gave it a 6 out of 10. Because it wasn't THAT bad. Just it should have, could have, been far better.
And in these days, a straightforward Good-v-Evil western is refreshing, or, rather, SHOULD BE refreshing. And this tries hard. And (sadly) fails.
The storyline is OK, derivative, but modernised, and - well - OK, what can I say, it's just alright.
The acting's OK, pretty good, in parts. The hero, well, he's a hero. We are in NO DOUBT that he's a good guy.
The women are - well, women, really. The strong mother is OK, ('til the end bit, where she mainly screams and doesn't shoot anything), but mainly the women are pretty 2 dimensional, apart from the one who has so much plastic in her lips she looks like she has her mouth on upside down, and she disappears from the story in a really unconvincing way.
Oh, I don't know. I wanted to like this. I watched it to the end, (Parenthood meets Mum's Apple Pie), and I'm not left with an AWFUL taste in my mouth, just a bitter disappointment. It should have been better.
OK. To be honest? If the producer had hired a decent director, it would have been better.
And he also should have spent a few dollars on someone to direct his fight scenes. That last one is pretty bad.
But, OK, I gave it a 6 out of 10. Because it wasn't THAT bad. Just it should have, could have, been far better.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe movie set location is in Gammons Gulch, Arizona, in a specially constructed Western-style town for tourists and commercial enterprises. The saloon was newly built for the movie.
- GaffesWhen Travis McCain enters The Majestic Saloon at the beginning, he gives his gun up to Newman Hicks. A few seconds later, as he is walking up to Thomas Morgan's table, the gun can be seen in McCain's holster.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Gundown?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 37min(97 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant