In isolation

The bad: a "thriller" that doesnt thrill. Not one bit. What do I need say more? The whole point of a "thriller" is that I get excited, that I live in great anxiety of what is gonna happen, that I am shocked. None of that.

Not any good? It aint a terrible movie, but I would categorize "In Isolation" as a tv movie, with below average tv movie actors, with a below average script and with below average technical details, like photography and sound.

In Isolation is just going through the motions. I wonder who this movie could best be suited for and I kinda veer to the tv soap audience, because the casual tv soap viewer doesnt mind below average quality at all, they just wanna see a mildly entertaining story.

If Hallmark decided to make action/thriller movies: It would look better than this.

I found the poor sound quality very annoying from the first sentences on. It obviously didn't get better. Maybe if I had watched the movie with headphones I would get a better audio, but as it was, it was a complete turn off.

The cinematography was really weak too. Add to it poor scenery.

The story was not even slightly interesting plus meaningless dialogues on top. You'll spend the whole story screaming at the movie about how no adult would talk or act like that.

All in all a waste of time. I didn't have high expectations, but I think you can create a better movie than this with little resources.

This movie was such a waste of time. They clearly filmed this and then re-recorded the audio after and dubbed it over themselves. This makes an already awkward script even more awkward. Weird conversations, that due to the dubbing, have no emotion.

It's really hard to tell due to this if the actors are actually any good at all, or if it's just because it was dubbed over.

Unlikeable characters, weird editing and a predictable and boring story make for 2 hours of... well frankly of confusion.

And the ending... NO just NO. Waste of time. Don't watch this unless you want a good laugh at how bad this is.

I watched it for 15 minutes before turning off.

The acting is poor and the dialogue on the audio track seeming like it was from a different film really distracted from what was going on.

I'm not sure how or why dialogue is dubbed on after completion of scene production, probably because the sound on the set isn't clear and sharp I expect, but they could at least have had the voice actors say the lines that they said when shooting the scenes. Were the actors' voices not good enough?

It was like watching an ad break where all the ads are foreign but dubbed into English to save money.

It's a one from me.

Lot of reviewers complaining about the terrible dubbing. Turn the sound down, and try not to look at the actors (if they were actors) mouths too much. As for the rest of the movie, it isn't the worst movie in my worst movie list. I liked the premise of the story, society breaking down amidst a deadly virus. Covid? Although it isn't specified, but you know, why not. People were being affected by the isolation. As well as this you have the main character, and the one I mainly rooted for, suffering from a phobia. The action sequences were done well, and I think the cinematography was fine for a low budget film. Definitely low budget,because I didn't know any of the actors or director. But,hey,it was a good time filler,and gets an average score from me for effort.