[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Menace arctique

Titre original : Arctic Blast
  • 2010
  • 1h 32min
NOTE IMDb
3,9/10
4,3 k
MA NOTE
Menace arctique (2010)
Trailer for Arctic Blast
Lire trailer2:05
1 Video
13 photos
CatastropheActionAventureDrameScience-fictionThriller

Lorsqu'une éclipse solaire envoie une explosion colossale d'air super froid vers la terre, elle déclenche alors une chaîne d'événements catastrophique qui menace d'engloutir le monde.Lorsqu'une éclipse solaire envoie une explosion colossale d'air super froid vers la terre, elle déclenche alors une chaîne d'événements catastrophique qui menace d'engloutir le monde.Lorsqu'une éclipse solaire envoie une explosion colossale d'air super froid vers la terre, elle déclenche alors une chaîne d'événements catastrophique qui menace d'engloutir le monde.

  • Réalisation
    • Brian Trenchard-Smith
  • Scénario
    • Jason Bourque
  • Casting principal
    • Michael Shanks
    • Alexandra Davies
    • Saskia Hampele
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    3,9/10
    4,3 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Brian Trenchard-Smith
    • Scénario
      • Jason Bourque
    • Casting principal
      • Michael Shanks
      • Alexandra Davies
      • Saskia Hampele
    • 66avis d'utilisateurs
    • 9avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Vidéos1

    Arctic Blast
    Trailer 2:05
    Arctic Blast

    Photos12

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 9
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux36

    Modifier
    Michael Shanks
    Michael Shanks
    • Jack Tate
    Alexandra Davies
    Alexandra Davies
    • Emma Tate
    Saskia Hampele
    Saskia Hampele
    • Zoe
    Indiana Evans
    Indiana Evans
    • Naomi Tate
    Robert Mammone
    Robert Mammone
    • Charlie Barker
    Bruce Davison
    Bruce Davison
    • Walter Winslaw
    Judith Baribeau
    Judith Baribeau
    • Tammy
    Nick Falk
    • Brent Durant
    • (as Nicholas Falk)
    Alan Andrews
    • Harold Stuart
    Helen Edwards
    • Margaret Stuart
    Abbey-Rose Leed
    • Young Woman - Sarah
    Jakalyn Gatward
    • Franny
    Bodane Hatton
    • Jarrod
    Jane Longhurst
    Jane Longhurst
    • Lawyer - Susan
    Nathan Spencer
    • Technician #1
    Cinthia Burke
    • Elizabeth
    Andrew Casey
    Andrew Casey
    • Alex
    Sara Ellis Holland
    Sara Ellis Holland
    • Meteorologist
    • (as Sara Cooper)
    • Réalisation
      • Brian Trenchard-Smith
    • Scénario
      • Jason Bourque
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs66

    3,94.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    6NozinAroun81

    The Day After Tomorrow When the Cold Snap Began in Hobart!

    My "Summary" pretty much explains it all and my 6 star review is very generous. I only watched this movie because it was yet-to-be-reviewed on IMDb and because I have a... thing for Indiana Evans (Matilda from Home and Away). It's very similar to The Day After Tomorrow and sadly it's destined to drown in the shadows of Tomorrow When the War Began. Nevertheless it was nice to see a straight-to-DVD Aussie disaster movie that wasn't a total disaster.

    The ozone layer lets us down and suddenly an icy gust manifests itself just south of Tasmania. It soon becomes a global concern when Tazzies turn up looking like a T-1000 drenched in liquid nitrogen. If only they'd listened to the guy who tried to warn them... blah blah... and his daughter is so hot... blah blah... and his boss is that rubber senator dude from X-men and he's not being very helpful... blah blah.

    The acting is very "Home and Away on a Good Day", but I get the feeling that all the actors did the best they could with the wooden script. Sometimes it's hard to tell if they're Aussie's pretending to be American's or vice versa, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. There's a little splash of Kiwi and even Big Ben gets a wee bit nippy at one stage.

    The more you like Aussie films, disaster films, mindless entertainment and/or Indiana Evans, the more you'll like this film. In a nutshell, the acting is okay, the concept is okay, the effects are okay and for all we know it could be the most prophetic movie ever made. If we all instantly freeze to death, I'll give it an extra star or 2. Needless to say that I strongly recommend it to Meteorologists from Hobart or Sydney.

    Check out my IMDb List for some better suggestions. "HORROR/THRILLER: Obscure, Overlooked & Underrated" http://www.imdb.com/list/8QFZ78e4Ar8/
    charles000

    This is the quintessential bottom feeding, below low end, cheesiest, unintended comedy disaster film of all time

    "Easily one of the worst movies of all time. I'm understating it."

    No disagreement here!!!

    This is the quintessential "Plan 9 From Outer Space" (for everyone familiar with this alltime classic low budget scifi film) of disaster genre' films.

    Every hackneyed cliché' that could possibly be imagined was tossed into this thing . . . sort of like a mental indigestion.

    I can only imagine what was going on at the set while they were actually shooting film for this thing.

    The actors and film crew must have been barely able to keep from constantly laughing as they attempted to say their lines and plod their way through these evermore, beyond ridiculous scenes.

    Either that, or everyone must have been smoking "something" during this entire escapade.

    Come to think of it, the behind the scenes, "the making of . . . " footage of this unintended comedy extraordinaire actually might have been truly entertaining to watch, certainly more interesting than the actual film itself.

    Trust me on this one . . . do not spend any money, as in none, zero, nada to see this clunker, unless, of course, one has a particular fetish for exceedingly bad films.

    OK, I kept this as polite and civil as possible.
    5shroyerw-1

    Scientifically inaccurate, but entertaining.

    If you were irritated by the fact that Jack & Rose's path through the Titanic couldn't possibly have happened as they went through rooms that didn't even connect and doors that weren't even there and parts of the ship that were on entirely opposite sides without having to cross through the middle, then you won't like this movie.

    It's definitely a made-for-TV type of movie and it's definitely modeled after "The Day after Tomorrow" (almost character-for-character). The science is rather atrocious, also, but if you yourself -are- scientifically illiterate or if you're just used to scientific illiteracy in cinema and therefore unphased by it, then you might like this flick. I was surprised to see SG1's Michael Shanks in what seemed to all appearances to be third-rate billing, but he was in it and he played as well as he ever does.

    I'd recommend this if you're really kinda' reaching for something to watch, and you're not feeling too picky and SyFy made-for-TV quality is acceptable to you (I don't think it's a SyFy flick, but it's the same general quality). If you're into serious flicks, or if you don't care to see another "Day After Tomorrow", steer clear.
    4transient-2

    frozen drinks

    My initial response to this film was unfairly snide, searching the lead actor's face in vain for simple change of expression. But although it took some time, I was finally able to find redeeming value in this tepid disaster film; this apparent new sub-genre of divorced dads winning back their families by saving them from natural disasters might have some worth if you take a drink every time you see someone on the phone. Of course having a character talk on the phone does not contribute any sense of urgency or suspense. In fact watching people talk on the phone in films is as annoying as watching them talk on the phone in real life - but this film is annoying enough to leave you falling down drunk. Three sips for speaker-phone, two sips for a headset, this film promises a good time.
    3SnoopyStyle

    Bad science and computer models

    Solar eclipses are effecting the atmospheric layer causing a gigantic drop in temperatures. Jack Tate (Michael Shanks) leads a climate science team based in Hobart, Australia. Unbeknownst to them, their research ship gets flash frozen when a jet of cold air blast through the atmosphere. Jack is facing a divorce from his wife Emma and his daughter Namoi is not happy. He is shocked to see their ship run aground. Institute head Walter Winslaw (Bruce Davison) is reluctant to alarm the public. Jack can't get a warning out and he has to rescue his kid.

    This is pulling from similar junk-science as "The Day After Tomorrow". The difference is that nobody cared about the science in that movie. It was just an excuse to see NYC get CGI destroyed by a tidal wave. There is no such fun in this movie. The CGI in this one is pretty weak. The other problem is the way the situation is solved. It is basically a lot of computer modeling. I do have to say that this is some of the best fake computer modeling around. :) The action is mostly badly conceived. When Jack gets to the beach, he should grab her kid and yell "RUN!" Instead, he spends time to explain science to the kids and stand around waiting for them. It's an opportunity to amp up the tension. He should be raving mad which would inject some excitement. Worst of all, Jack takes off in the middle of a world wide catastrophe to go to the drug store. It's a pretty bad TV movie.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    A l'aube du dernier jour
    3,8
    A l'aube du dernier jour
    Face à la tornade
    3,3
    Face à la tornade
    Hurricane
    5,1
    Hurricane
    Tornade de glace
    4,1
    Tornade de glace
    Flight 42, Retour vers l'enfer
    4,5
    Flight 42, Retour vers l'enfer
    Hours
    6,3
    Hours
    The Super
    The Super
    Asteroid Impact
    3,6
    Asteroid Impact
    Tempête solaire : Au péril de la Terre
    4,5
    Tempête solaire : Au péril de la Terre
    Le jugement dernier
    4,0
    Le jugement dernier
    Menace sur la Terre
    3,8
    Menace sur la Terre
    Geostorm
    5,4
    Geostorm

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Due to its filming location, this is the first full length feature film to be filmed in Hobart Tasmania Australia and its surrounds.
    • Gaffes
      The premise of the movie is incorrect. The ozone layer blocks harmful UltraViolet C light, which is a very important function to most life on this planet, since UVC destroys DNA (The higher the frequency the worse it is. UVA gives you a tan, UVB gives you melanoma, UVC kills everything), but Ozone is not a barrier preventing the cold of the mesosphere from reaching the ground ... that's mainly Air Pressure and Convection ... Warmer air rises, and air moves from high pressure to low pressure areas.

      Ozone is an oxygen molecule with three single linked oxygen atoms in a triangle rather than two double linked atoms, and the photo-chemical reaction of oxygen to ozone and back is what absorbs the UVC wavelength energy. The ozone layer is between 12 and 19 miles above the earth, but if it were compressed to the atmospheric pressure at sea level, it would only be about 3 millimeters thick. The danger in a "rift" or hole in the ozone layer is rapid sunburn, possible genetic damage/mutation, or death depending on exposure level. for many years there has been a hole in the ozone layer in the southern hemisphere. it expands and contracts yearly, and most years it slowly moves around between Antarctica and the southern ocean and during other years it spans the entire Antarctic continent.
    • Connexions
      Featured in Starfilm (2017)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ15

    • How long is Arctic Blast?Alimenté par Alexa
    • What is the artist and titles of the songs played during the closing credits?

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 30 mai 2010 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Australie
      • Canada
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Menace de glace
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Hobart, Tasmanie, Australie
    • Sociétés de production
      • F.G. Film Productions
      • Premiere Bobine
      • Screen Tasmania
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 5 000 000 $AU (estimé)
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 32min(92 min)
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Digital
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.