Rebel Moon - Partie 1 : Enfant du feu
Titre original : Rebel Moon - Part One: A Child of Fire
Une jeune femme cherche des guerriers d'autres planètes pour combattre les armées tyranniques qui terrorisent sa paisible colonie.Une jeune femme cherche des guerriers d'autres planètes pour combattre les armées tyranniques qui terrorisent sa paisible colonie.Une jeune femme cherche des guerriers d'autres planètes pour combattre les armées tyranniques qui terrorisent sa paisible colonie.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 4 nominations au total
Anthony Hopkins
- Jimmy
- (voix)
Ingvar Sigurdsson
- Hagen
- (as Ingvar Sigurðsson)
Elise Duffy
- Milius
- (as E. Duffy)
Avis à la une
It is all over the place. No character connection. Vulgar scenes to force emotions. Weird cheap cocktail of Star Wars and Dune. Felt like fan-made university project with a multi-million budget that was only spend on slow motion CGI scenes. I doubt that the extended edition will have more movie magic since this one already fails in every sense.
Not even the world-building or the design felt worth watching since it felt like the characters were in costumes rather than authentic dresses. No scene composition gave the feeling of a profound world with deep history.
Too many unoriginal ideas that were thrown together with the hope of "Let's hope it will be the next movie success".
I wouldn't say that the actors were weak, rather the error or lack of writers in the writing process of the movie show how important dialogue, character building arcs and real emotional value are in movies rather than gross tasteless blood baths, torture, explosions and one-dimensional characters.
Not even the world-building or the design felt worth watching since it felt like the characters were in costumes rather than authentic dresses. No scene composition gave the feeling of a profound world with deep history.
Too many unoriginal ideas that were thrown together with the hope of "Let's hope it will be the next movie success".
I wouldn't say that the actors were weak, rather the error or lack of writers in the writing process of the movie show how important dialogue, character building arcs and real emotional value are in movies rather than gross tasteless blood baths, torture, explosions and one-dimensional characters.
As an other reviewer wrote, there are wooden language, wooden expressions and wooden dialogue.
The first ting I noticed in the movie was the words the actors spoke seemed like they had been written by a teenager... so many pointless words.
Then there where the actors speaking the words, they just seemed wierd and emotionless.
Then there are the action scenes. There are a lot of them, and they could have been really good. But the editing are just a bunch of normal speed, slow speed clipping to make it look good, and the bad guys just stand still doing nothing while the "hero" spends minutes moving around in the open...
CGI/Greenscreen galore.. but very well done. So this is perhaps the strongest part of the movie.
Waisted and nonsense slowmo sections... there are so many of them... and they are so pointless and gives nothing to the movie. There are movies and directors that know how to use slow motion sequences in a movie, and then there are this movie and director, that did not take that class... it's just a waist of time.
In summary, if you are able to ignore all the writing, dialogue, acting/directing issues... its a passable scifi action movie.
The movie could have been so much better, because there is a decent enough story underneath.. and they obviously had enough money to do what they wanted...
I'm assuming Netflix payed for this. So I'm guessing that there where a big payday for writer/director and no requirements for quality on the delivered product. So they just cut from the budget anyone that could have given the director feedback on the uality issues.
The first ting I noticed in the movie was the words the actors spoke seemed like they had been written by a teenager... so many pointless words.
Then there where the actors speaking the words, they just seemed wierd and emotionless.
Then there are the action scenes. There are a lot of them, and they could have been really good. But the editing are just a bunch of normal speed, slow speed clipping to make it look good, and the bad guys just stand still doing nothing while the "hero" spends minutes moving around in the open...
CGI/Greenscreen galore.. but very well done. So this is perhaps the strongest part of the movie.
Waisted and nonsense slowmo sections... there are so many of them... and they are so pointless and gives nothing to the movie. There are movies and directors that know how to use slow motion sequences in a movie, and then there are this movie and director, that did not take that class... it's just a waist of time.
In summary, if you are able to ignore all the writing, dialogue, acting/directing issues... its a passable scifi action movie.
The movie could have been so much better, because there is a decent enough story underneath.. and they obviously had enough money to do what they wanted...
I'm assuming Netflix payed for this. So I'm guessing that there where a big payday for writer/director and no requirements for quality on the delivered product. So they just cut from the budget anyone that could have given the director feedback on the uality issues.
I wanted this to be good so badly. Like really badly.
Other than the world design and effects, there really isn't much else to salvage from it.
In true Snyder style we've got lens flare and slow motion, but this time he's dialled it up over the top.
Some of the action scenes are absolutely ruined from way too much diving in and out of slow motion.
The biggest disappointment is the writing.
The first 70% of the film is absolutely a waste of time and not needed.
You don't find out most of the characters actual relevance until the back end of the film.
Everything before that is a mixture of utterly pointless painfully boring scenes done for the sole purpose of filler.
Looks great, but that's all.
Other than the world design and effects, there really isn't much else to salvage from it.
In true Snyder style we've got lens flare and slow motion, but this time he's dialled it up over the top.
Some of the action scenes are absolutely ruined from way too much diving in and out of slow motion.
The biggest disappointment is the writing.
The first 70% of the film is absolutely a waste of time and not needed.
You don't find out most of the characters actual relevance until the back end of the film.
Everything before that is a mixture of utterly pointless painfully boring scenes done for the sole purpose of filler.
Looks great, but that's all.
A test of the degree of imagination shown in a sci-fi film is whether it could equally have been done as a cowboy movie. "Rebel Moon Pt. 1" could have, and the movie would have been "The Magnificent Seven" (1960, 2016, 1998-2000 as a TV series, or indeed "Seven Samurai" of 1954), because the plot is err.... identical. And I expect the plot of the second half will be identical too. So if you have ever seen any of those and a spaceship taking off, you don't need to see this movie (OK, some of the spaceship imagery is very good). But I have to wonder whether anyone was actually paid for "writing" the script :-)
Like many others I was hoping for something good and a bit different and felt a bit let down. I found it lost itself in connection, there just seemed to be something missing however I now know what was missing and what was missing was literally half the movie. I decided to watch the directors cut out of curiosity as I felt it may have added what I felt was missing and wow just like magic it all seemed so much better and made a lot more sense almost like it was an entirely different movie with some character and story background. I think the short version was an attempt at trying to cater to a commercial audience but in reality the long version should have just been the original. Much better 7-6 stars for the editors cut but only 4-4 for the original. Although it's much better, still lacking something.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesZack Snyder first conceived this as a Star Wars movie, and pitched it to Lucasfilm shortly after it was bought by Disney in 2012, but it never got off the ground.
- GaffesThe shape of the floating platform on Gondival [at 1:52:00] changes depending on where it is viewed from. When Noble lands on it, and later Kora (and all shots from above, and of their fight) it is octagonal, or eight-sided - i.e. five edges are often in the shot, two of which are parallel; but in all the shots from underneath (as when Kora falls over the edge) it is shown as hexagonal, or six-sided; however it cannot be both.
- Versions alternativesOn August 2nd, 2024, Netflix released an R-rated director's cut of the film, titled Rebel Moon - Part One: Chalice of Blood. This version runs for 205 minutes (3h 25m) and features more violence, language and sexuality which were removed from A Child of Fire.
- Bandes originalesThunderous
Written and Performed by Diego Stocco
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Rebel Moon - Part One: A Child of Fire?Alimenté par Alexa
- Will this be a single film or in multiple parts?
- Is this film related to or inspired by Star Wars?
- Have any cast or crew members previously worked with Zack Snyder in previous productions?
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Rebel Moon - Parte 1: La niña del fuego
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 90 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée2 heures 13 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What was the official certification given to Rebel Moon - Partie 1 : Enfant du feu (2023) in Canada?
Répondre