[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

The Genesis Code

  • 2010
  • PG
  • 2h 18min
NOTE IMDb
4,9/10
723
MA NOTE
The Genesis Code (2010)
Trailer for The Genesis Code
Lire trailer1:45
2 Videos
1 photo
Drame

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA college hockey player and a female journalism student struggle to find common ground with their spiritual faith and scientific studies.A college hockey player and a female journalism student struggle to find common ground with their spiritual faith and scientific studies.A college hockey player and a female journalism student struggle to find common ground with their spiritual faith and scientific studies.

  • Réalisation
    • C. Thomas Howell
    • Patrick Read Johnson
  • Scénario
    • Michael W. Leighton
  • Casting principal
    • Logan Bartholomew
    • Kelsey Sanders
    • C.R. Lewis
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    4,9/10
    723
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • C. Thomas Howell
      • Patrick Read Johnson
    • Scénario
      • Michael W. Leighton
    • Casting principal
      • Logan Bartholomew
      • Kelsey Sanders
      • C.R. Lewis
    • 29avis d'utilisateurs
    • 2avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Vidéos2

    The Genesis Code
    Trailer 1:45
    The Genesis Code
    The Genesis Code
    Trailer 1:52
    The Genesis Code
    The Genesis Code
    Trailer 1:52
    The Genesis Code

    Photos

    Rôles principaux57

    Modifier
    Logan Bartholomew
    Logan Bartholomew
    • Blake Truman
    Kelsey Sanders
    Kelsey Sanders
    • Kerry Wells
    C.R. Lewis
    • Shane Thomas
    Ernest Borgnine
    Ernest Borgnine
    • Carl Taylor
    Louise Fletcher
    Louise Fletcher
    • Ellen Taylor
    Fred Thompson
    Fred Thompson
    • Judge Hardin
    • (as Fred Dalton Thompson)
    Lance Henriksen
    Lance Henriksen
    • Dr. Hoffer
    Rance Howard
    Rance Howard
    • Dr. Tolley
    Ben Murphy
    Ben Murphy
    • Professor Campbell
    Catherine Hicks
    Catherine Hicks
    • Myra Allitt
    Susan Blakely
    Susan Blakely
    • Beverly Truman
    Rich Franklin
    Rich Franklin
    • Coach Edwards
    Adam Chambers
    Adam Chambers
    • Marc Wells
    Michael William Freeman
    Michael William Freeman
    • Chase Laughton
    Danny Mooney
    Danny Mooney
    • Tyler Ross
    Jerry Zandstra
    • Reverend Wells
    Lauren Mae Shafer
    • Rita
    Roger Garcia
    Roger Garcia
    • Coach Rogers
    • Réalisation
      • C. Thomas Howell
      • Patrick Read Johnson
    • Scénario
      • Michael W. Leighton
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs29

    4,9723
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    5TheLittleSongbird

    Neither loved or hated it

    In fact while I really admired what The Genesis Code tried to do, I had a somewhat mixed view on it. For me, while it is not a movie worth a perfect 10, it is nowhere near bad enough to warrant a 1. I thought the production values were quite good, looking almost real at times(with the exception of moments of monotonous photography), and while stereotypes I did find myself sympathising with the lead characters and the priest, particularly Blake. Logan Bartholomew and Kelsey Sanders are very likable in the lead roles with a sweet chemistry and Jerry Zandstra also acquitted himself nicely. There are however a number of things that let The Genesis Code down. The concept was good and really quite ballsy, but the execution of it seemed rather muddled. The script is rather talky and often doesn't seem to know what it's talking about which is likely to confuse people like it did me. Where The Genesis Code is going to cause polarisation(and I can see through the reviews and the useful votes that there is already some going on) is how people are going to find it thought-provoking and how many are going to find that it talks down to them. For me, I can see both sides, I thought there were some decent ideas that later were poorly explored or convoluted in execution. The story is also confused, eventually does get tedious- sadly a lot of the movie does drag on and on- and even manages to short-circuit the initially touching love story to falling flat. Blake's heartache with his mum was actually quite affecting though. Actors like Ernest Borgnine, Louise Fletcher, Lance Henrikssen et al. immediately show some kind of promise, but a number of them only have a couple of lines or have appearances that would class as a walk-on. They're fun to spot and do what they can with what they have, but they deserved much more. In conclusion, a good idea that came across as muddled yet well-intentioned, making it a movie I neither loved or hated. 5/10 Bethany Cox
    5dansview

    Sweet Snoozefest

    I guess I can't call this film "manipulative," because most people read the plot before seeing it, and know it's a Christian movie that's going to promote the religion. Although the appearance of a few old stars and an Ultimate Fighting star in the cast make you wonder to what degree.

    The female protagonist looks the part. She has a very wholesome persona. I believe her. The male looks like the quarterback of the football team, not a hockey player. He's too pretty. He looks almost exactly like a young Brat Pack Andrew McCarthy.

    You've already read the plot. Two college students meet. One's a hockey star and one's writing for the school paper. She wants to do a bio on the athlete, but he's guarding his privacy. They have a little chemistry, but with both going through life crises simultaneously, they never get around to any real romance.

    I didn't believe that part. Just because she is a Christian does not mean she would not kiss, cuddle, and whatever else. They were two gorgeous young folks in the prime of their life. Christians have relationships.

    The film is used as a vehicle to either help young folks who are on the fence about their faith, reinforce the faith they already have, or to teach parents, teachers, and clergy how to minister to the "unchurched" or confused.

    The central conflict is science vs. religion and the centerpiece is a way too long, yet mildly creative lecture done in a planetarium by a group of physics students who want to reconcile the story of creation with science. Why not just forget the movie, and have the whole thing be a youtube lecture? They would save a lot of money.

    No one mentioned that C. Thomas Howell directed. I generally like him. I didn't know he was a Christian. Well, it was too slow and contrived. The actors while good, showed very little emotion. The worst aspect of the film was a role given to Catherine Hicks.She did show emotion and played an extremely awkward role well.

    The film makers have contempt for the secular elitists who run the modern universities. So the Hicks character, a PhD academic adviser spews a monologue about the silliness of faith, and how it will block the way to our protagonist finding liberated bliss in the "post modern" world.

    Even at liberal schools, which is virtually every one, she would probably get fired for that. The girl just sits and listens and doesn't fight back at all. Was she turning the other cheek? I didn't believe that she would remain silent.

    They have the adviser say all the buzz words that characterize the type of liberal that conservative Christians can't stand. She expresses her excitement about serving the "New World Order," joining the "elite," and moral relativity. This scene was painfully forced. Even the dumbest university liberal egghead would have found a more nuanced way to say all that.

    My favorite part that made me laugh, was placing a minister, a professor and a hockey player in a shooting range, while they discussed God. They managed to squeeze in God, Guns, Hockey, Weightlifting, Football, and contempt for elite academics in one movie. Ha ha.

    The best aspect was the acting. Despite the lack of strong emotion, I did feel their pain at times. There is some genuinely good dialogue, but again I think they would have been better off just doing an interesting and informative youtube video, instead of forcing some contrived plot.

    Or someone could do a video about how the early Christian fathers purposely mistranslated Hebrew in order to prove that the Torah was wrong and the Jews are evil. Read the scriptures. Those points are emphasized on every other page.
    1neoblaque

    Cereal Box Science

    If you get your science updates from the back of a cereal box, and your ability to discern truth from a Magic 8 Ball, then this movie is for you. Tokenism is running amok as the yarn is presented with the point of view of only the white Christian perspective and those from another cultural background are as flat and two dimensional as the plot and it's unfounded but humorous scientific 'melding". This film will appeal to those who want to believe that they are seeing beyond the Biblical errors, but a true deep thinker will only shake their head and ask for their money back from the theater. If C. Thomas Howell had changed a few lines and scenes, the film would have come across as a parody instead of simply a silly adventure to explain what does not exist. Creationism is not based on science, and well funded propaganda like this to justify the notations of 2000 year old nomads, to fit modern science theory and fact is a wasted effort.
    klein_jackie

    Thanks for a breath of fresh air...

    This is an excellent movie and I would recommend it to anyone, it was one that challenges the way we think about the very way we were created. I loved the way the film tugged at topics that are rarely discussed in any setting other than a church pew. I liked that it was a film based in a secular world with real life issues that were presented with a Christian viewpoint. I appreciate that this wasn't just another movie at the box office designed to provide us with a cheap laugh, it took real life questions and gave real life answers. When you go to the theater you think its about going to sit there and be entertained for an hour and half, then you get into your car and probably laugh about some parts later but in general it lends nothing to your life, this movie won't be like that! This movie will make you think, make you question what you believe and why you believe it and it will answer the one question that has perplexed humans from day one, where did I come from???
    1samilmolina

    Boring and inaccurate

    Not only is this waste of film boring but also inaccurate. Aside from what I believe to be complete misunderstandings of science and evolution this movie does not offer anything meaningful, only a sappy, Christian story. I never had a "Worst movies list" until now, and this one tops it. To say that the acting in the movie is bad would be a gross understatement. The dialogue suffers in and of itself. The story itself is unoriginal and lacking in depth, a "quality" shared with the characters in the film. Unfortunately I cannot give this film a 0 out of 10, giving it a 1 is, in my opinion, being quite generous. This is not only an opinion of mine, my feelings are shared by many in the Christian community where the film was shot.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Genesis Code
    4,1
    Genesis Code
    The Man Who Shook the Hand of Vicente Fernandez
    5,9
    The Man Who Shook the Hand of Vicente Fernandez
    Another Harvest Moon
    5,8
    Another Harvest Moon
    Split Second
    7,0
    Split Second
    Hourglass
    3,4
    Hourglass
    5-25-77
    6,5
    5-25-77
    The Lion of Judah
    3,6
    The Lion of Judah
    War of the Worlds: Final Invasion
    2,1
    War of the Worlds: Final Invasion
    Voisine de coeur
    6,0
    Voisine de coeur
    Pur danger
    4,5
    Pur danger
    Pushed
    8,4
    Pushed
    Le nouvel homme invisible
    6,2
    Le nouvel homme invisible

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      The first director, Patrick Read Johnson, was fired and C. Thomas Howell was brought in to finish the film. DGA rules required that Johnson be given a shared credit.
    • Citations

      Marc Wells: Time itself is actually different for observers in different frames of reference when one frame is in motion relative to another.

    • Bandes originales
      A Soldier's King
      Written by Kenny Horton and John Jarvis

      Performed by C.R. Lewis

      Arranged by Bill Wandel

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ16

    • How long is The Genesis Code?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 25 août 2010 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Site officiel
      • Official site
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Код бытия
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Lowell, Michigan, États-Unis
    • Sociétés de production
      • Genesis Productions
      • CK Pictures
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 5 100 000 $US (estimé)
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 2h 18min(138 min)
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Digital
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.