2012: Supernova

I will give some credit where it is due, I have seen much worse movies, but that is not saying much. 2012:Supernova is my definition of a terrible movie, with pretty much nothing to recommend or redeem it other than an intriguing concept.

However, this concept is squandered, because the story structure is so disjointed and predictable and the pace is so sluggish. Even worse is the script, which is questionable in scientific logic and laughably bad in one too many parts, and the direction which is so sloppy I questioned whether there actually was any direction. The production values are not much better, the special effects do look really cheap, and the photography and such indicate that this film was made on a low-budget.

I was indifferent to every single one of the characters, that is including the lead character who is too bland to sympathise with his predicament. The Russian was the worst, the character verged on stereotypical and the accent was as fake as the effects. The acting is terrible and none of the actors connected to their characters which is probably a major reason why I didn't care for any of them.

In conclusion, a very, very, very poor movie. 1/10 Bethany Cox

there is nothing positive to tell about this movie. Acting horrible - Story? "A scientist tries to save the Earth from the deadly blast of a star gone supernova." where are all the scientists, NASA experts, military, politicians, the president? One scientist is trying to save the Earth with the help of a Chinese woman (who obviously did not grow in China) and a half drunk Russian. Some poor Russian accent and a glass of vodka doesn't make a convincing Russian. Well yes there is a story, but it is really painful to see how poorly this story can be put together. Low budget is no excuse. I fell asleep after 30 minutes, don't waste your time and money on this flick.

It was so bad I could not stop watching. And It's not bad so you laugh, just shocked at how bad it is.

Acting is so bad I almost cried. The script is unbelievable bad. This movie is like asking a Creationist to make a movie about the evolution, the writer have no insight in science at all. My 7 years old niece know more about how the world work.

I'd pay money to forget this movie. I mean it, it's that bad. If you like Sci-Fi stay very very far away from this movie.

If you like Armageddon type of movies and don't give a crap about realistic science and think it's fun to see really bad amateur actors and badly cut scenes, you wont be disappointed. The go ahead and have a blast.

What a waste of precious time. the CGI was hilarious - in a movie that should have CGI as one of its cornerstones of the storytelling ..

and not to mention the acting .. the Russian actor - please have him not put that much into the accent.

in short - one of the worst movie I have seen. no - make it - THE Worst movie I have EVER Seen.

I see now that I need to enter 10 lines of text. how the hell can I fill in 10 lines of text about a crappy movie ?

well, lets say that I would've enjoyed watching a news report about the economy in south east Turkmenistan much more than watching this movie.

Possibly the worst movie I've ever seen. Don't waste your time with this one period. The acting is unbelievably awful, the fake Russian guy, the mother and daughter, they should be struck off for life for injury to the public and the profession, maybe they should be sued under trades description or something similar!

Who funds this kind of thing and why? When you think about it there must be some kind of scam involved people can't be that dumb. Someone knows it will flop and that's the idea, like betting on something to lose or a tax right off. I don't know and don't really care, but what I do care about is whilst this gets funded and made and waste's our time there is no funding for the wealth of true talent that exists in abundance ignored by those who pretend to care about film and the standard of our entertainment and education.