[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
Retour
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Tamzin Outhwaite and Emun Elliott in Paradox (2009)

Avis des utilisateurs

Paradox

32 commentaires
8/10

Very interesting 5 part mini-series

Why, when the majority of the comments on this series are positive, is IMDb displaying only the negative ones on the first page and one has to delve deeper to find those that give the series praise? Also if anyone reading this looks closely at the negative comments and reads how many people found the comment useful, they will see that it's quoted as 5 out of 15, or something similar. Personally I found it far better than the big budget, typically glam, US production, Flash Forward, which, so I read on EZTV, because of low viewing figures may not be returning after the mid-season break. I recommend that you give this series a chance, you'll enjoy it!
  • martyncymro
  • 20 déc. 2009
  • Permalien
8/10

Gripping, intelligent sci-fi worth the time to watch

  • smokingtyger
  • 29 nov. 2009
  • Permalien
6/10

The Best BBC Sciennce Fiction Cop Show?

Although the first episode is not particularly engaging (not a good sign) I persevered and from the second story on they have definitely got better and better.

The thing that makes this series most interesting to me isn't the science fictiony bits - not that there's really that much involved in this story. The main influence of science fiction on the plot is mainly on the delivery of the plot line pictures but the suspense in the story comes down to good old character interaction and the way that that the three police officers interact with each other and the scientist running the satellite that appears to be taking the photographs that are cuing the police into the incidents they are investigating.

Each of the characters has a particular view on what these pictures represent, from the DS's continuing scepticism of the photographs reality to the scientist's belief that the pictures are showing the future but he has issues with his bosses in the shadowy section of the MoD that is contracting the work he's doing.

It's been good in the way that the Beeb haven't shied away from letting people die - this power has not given the cops god-like abilities to change the future, and there have been moral dilemmas as to who can be saved.

All-in-all an interesting set of story lines.
  • johnFair
  • 16 déc. 2009
  • Permalien
9/10

Why, oh why?

BBC I truly love you and I adore your series, so tell me please- why did you stop producing this one? I've read critical opinions about clumsy dialogs, bad acting, non-logical storyline, but every movie/series have them and they're going still. So why that, in my opinion, interesting, intelligent, fascinating show had to end? And had to end in such a moment? Personal I've found dialogs, acting very good. If storyline wasn't absolutely logical, I've hadn't notice that. Maybe it wasn't most important, maybe I just wanna be lied- it's a show- it can lie, because it's its own magic Is there any chance to back to production? Sadly, I know the answer.
  • vulneri
  • 9 nov. 2010
  • Permalien
7/10

5 engaging enigmas, but be warned: the series has no finale

  • gridoon2025
  • 19 sept. 2016
  • Permalien
9/10

Not your ordinary police procedural!

If you are used to the standard police drama series where innovation rarely stretches your imagination or that of the characters beyond taking them to yet another obscure region of the UK or US then this will refresh your parts that other police shows cannot reach! This is less of a 'whodunnit' and more of 'whydidit?'. This series takes a very familiar genre and turns it on its head in a way that is refreshingly new. In the true style of Brit police shows this is dark and tortured, this is not a glossy American show with more style than substance. The actors are excellent and the 'will they, won't they?' is very well done. A 'must watch'!
  • mark-jennings-1
  • 11 déc. 2009
  • Permalien
7/10

not bad but reminds me of something

  • am-14
  • 23 déc. 2009
  • Permalien
9/10

Brilliant, why was it not renewed ?????

  • moon-stargirl
  • 13 juin 2012
  • Permalien
7/10

Great beginning, but series fizzles quickly

The series has five episodes, and, despite an ambiguous conclusion, was not renewed for subsequent runs.

Episode 1 and 2 provide for riveting television, but subsequent episodes are mostly forgettable and, as such, heavily disappointing. Had the show been stopped after the first two stories, this reviewer would have rated it 10 stars out of 10. In fact, I HIGHLY recommend that a new viewer treats this as a two-part movie and ignores the last three episodes.

BBC elected not to renew the series despite an ambiguous conclusion in the final episodes. You WILL be left with questions regardless of where you stop, so you might as well stop while it's still a fun memory.

Brief spoiler-free synopsis: A flurry of electromagnetic activity of the sun seems to coincide with the broadcast of a cryptic series of images. The enigmatic Dr. Christian King enlists the help of a local Detective Inspector in deciphering the images. Do they actually predict future events of a tragic nature, and if so, can the future be changed?
  • walt-weller
  • 25 mai 2020
  • Permalien
5/10

Averting disaster

Paradox only lasted for one series and despite a thrilling final 10 minutes the whole series and its character never gelled.

Shown in 2009 and filmed in and around Manchester, this science fiction thriller starred Tamzin Outhwaite as Detective Inspector Flint who headed a police unit that investigate images being broadcast to a astrophysicist Dr Christian King's (Emun Elliott) laboratory, which appear to show catastrophic events 18 hours from the future and they need to figure out what it is and how to stop it before time runs out.

Despite the exciting climax to the episodes the first 50 minutes of the drama were insipid and dull. You actually wonder if the producers actually look at the construction of an episode. Not just the script but the whole tone, pacing and how it looks with exciting characters that the audience can identify with.

The episodes looked as drab as the Manchester skyline but that did not stop Life on Mars being a hit series with its sci-fi twist and of course Doctor Who since its relaunch showed the British science fiction can be hip, edgy, exciting and reach various demographics.

Somewhere in the concept was a good series trying to get off the ground. A missed opportunity.
  • Prismark10
  • 30 janv. 2015
  • Permalien
9/10

Solid start to an intriguing UK series

A new British sci-fi series is always an event in my book and Paradox, after 3 episodes, offers a solid start to what looks like an entertaining sci-fi/detective series. As much as I like Fringe, Flashforward, Lost etc the Brits have a knack for creating identifiable, real world characters far removed from the generic, glossy airbrush identi-kit personalities that the States love so much. real people with real problems thrust into a realistic drama. How would you react if your computer suddenly started showing you images from the future? A show with a ton of promise... lets hope they continue to raise the bar for intelligent, realistic scifi as the show progresses.
  • zoz-603-463961
  • 13 déc. 2009
  • Permalien

It's okay

The comparison to FlashForward was very apt and I was surprised a Brit made it. All the USdumping about imitation, it's payback time! Every time we go to EE's tortured face (or whatever that expression is) I have to remind myself this is NOT Joseph Fiennes - as if they deliberately were looking for a copy. Both can probably act better than these roles demand but it looks like they had a deadringer's runoff. Who is taking the pictures may also involve parallel universes, just 6 hours or so instead of 6 months flashing forward. I am enjoying it anyway, there is some satisfaction to the greater potential of changing the future than FF has so far presented.
  • diayag
  • 14 déc. 2009
  • Permalien
6/10

Another Promising British Show Ruined by Idiosyncrasies

British shows are so infuriating, and this is no exception. The plot is great, the production values excellent for a tv show, the actors really giving it all, but the characters are atrocious presumably because the writers think that people who act nothing like normal people are interesting. I don't know why British writers do that, but it seems endemic to their industry. I think it has to do with trying to be original or something, but it really just makes their art awkward and seem unauthentic.
  • dave-214-436913
  • 12 déc. 2020
  • Permalien
4/10

Mind numbingly slow

Maybe its because i've been watching a lot of American shows such as Heroes, 24, prison break and dexter which are fast paced and action packed, that i found this show to be extremely slow and dull. Don't get me wrong, I love our telly in the uk but this show just took forever to get started and even when it did, it crawled along at the same pace as a geriatric snail with bad cramp. None of the characters were interesting or particularly likable, the storyline was very weak, the dialogue dreadful and the cinematography dreary. I love sci-fi, particularly involving time travel but this show not so much. After watching the first episode of this, i won't waste my time watching any more. It certainly ain't life on mars!
  • derektrotteresq
  • 28 nov. 2009
  • Permalien
9/10

A truly excellent show

  • gombo666
  • 24 nov. 2009
  • Permalien
7/10

Interesting Mini-Series

This series caught our interest right away in spite of the interpersonal drama between characters. It ended abruptly after 5 episodes and we wondered if it was supposed to be picked up for another season. I was disappoined in the drama queen behavior of DI Flint & DS Holt. The storylines were compelling though and made up for the weaknesses.
  • gerrgrady-86307
  • 19 janv. 2022
  • Permalien
10/10

Paradox - more please!

I have just watched the first 5 episodes of Paradox - it has just aired here in New Zealand. I loved it - every episode and can't believe thats it - only 5 episodes! Please bring more to me - there's still so much to explore. Where are the messages coming from, what does this mean about the nature of reality (deep eh!), how are all the characters linked? I love the relationships the characters have with each other. I think Tasmin Outhwaite portrays her part amazingly well. The acting is great, the story is exciting, interesting and absorbing. I find there are very few programmes on television these days which grab my attention and which I feel I need to see every episode. Mostly I can take or leave it and if I miss an episode - so what. With Paradox I was glued to each episode and felt I had to make sure I saw every episode. I only wish I had recorded the episodes so that I could watch them again. It's the best programme I have seen for a long time. More please!!
  • phsaccess
  • 20 avr. 2011
  • Permalien
9/10

Better than Fringe?

Paradox is obviously inspired by Fringe: Heavily featured out of the way City (Boston/Manchester), Blonde female lead, Mysterious high tech corporation behind the happenings, something else I won't mention to not spoil Fringe plot, Team that is formed from the normal police force but deployed to track unexplained phenomenon, socially awkward scientists provide technical support. I love both shows, but I think Paradox is more intelligent and disciplined. Fringe is all over the place (and fascinating for it), but Paradox stays focused on one phenomenon and milks it. Each episode you get a little more. With Fringe I get the feeling that we are being introduced to an ever increasing piece of an ever increasing pie. In other words, that there is no way we are ever going to get a complete explanation. But with Paradox, I may hold out hope. I also like the way that both shows are filmed on location. You definitely get a feel for the cities.
  • robhaskell
  • 25 déc. 2009
  • Permalien
3/10

If you like really good sci-fi thrillers... go watch 2012, forget about this

If you're used to watching American science fiction series and films, then this one may not be to your liking. Elizabeth Mickery, whom has written for such British dramas such as Byker Grove, The Bill and Heartbeat brings us another low-budget drama filled with terrible writing and poor acting.

Not only was there no plot twists, interesting developments and characters with personalities, but there was also no action, nothing for the watcher to think about and nothing to grip the watcher.

However, if you enjoy watching The Bill, but with a little sci-fi twist to it but not much else, then this series from what I've seen in episode 1 is for you. However, if you're looking for something bigger budget, well written, with better acting and more action, then I'll suggest you stick to the American Flash Forward, which appears to be the superior to this series in every way.

And the positives about this series?... 1) the low budget means the casting team couldn't steal anyone worthwhile away from doing something more productive 2) because it was made so badly, it had caused a paradox in time, meaning that the lucky few who were affected by its dreadfulness were actually referred to this review ahead of time, thus potentially avoiding a wasted hour that could be better spent outdoors playing football, attempting home-made lasagne, or banging their heads on the wall.

As a finale, the final note is that the only "Paradox" you'll see in this episode is... if the event happened at said time.............. then who took the photographs... and when?
  • helenbsb
  • 25 nov. 2009
  • Permalien
9/10

Very interesting thriller

Yes, it's not an American TV show. So you will not find tons of special effects, sophisticated action scenes and so on. In the other hand, you can count on a very intelligent script, good acting and very nice and well prepared suspense scenes. Actually, this TV show follows a kind of UK productions (and, being more specific, BBC productions) tradition, to present series with this quality (Survivors is another good example). Hopefully we will have more than the already predefined 5 episodes and, hopefully, the audience will not be frustrated with a premature end, without a convenient conclusion that bring some light to all open questions (what, unfortunately is quite common nowadays in other TV shows).
  • rfurlani-606-151853
  • 12 déc. 2009
  • Permalien
1/10

Formula driven to the Nth degree!

This is a concept show with an interesting premise but each episode becomes progressively more formula driven to the point where the repetitiveness causes you to lose interest. It is not difficult to see why it was cancelled. The characters are all very surly and unlikable, the dialog random and often unrelated to the story, and the scripts tedious and bit predictable. The audio is so poor at at times that it becomes necessary to turn on the subtitles even if you are a native speaker of English. Maybe it was done on a budget but it's not worth the effort to watch all 5 episodes. By episode 3, the fact that it is a time-waster becomes very apparent!
  • qui_j
  • 20 juin 2021
  • Permalien
9/10

Surprisingly good English thriller

This is one of the best recent European productions I've seen. It offers a reasonably good plot (not very original, but still interesting), enough twists to keep you interested, some acceptable action scenes, credible characters and surprisingly good acting.

Do not expect Hollywood-like explosive action or amazing special effects, this is more of a psychological thriller with lots of indoor acting and some short but intense action scenes. It's more of a mystery/crime drama with a SciFi twist, and it has more in common with "Criminal minds" than with "Star Trek"... until now anyway (only 3 episodes aired).

As drawbacks I can count poor acting on behalf of some of the secondary/supporting characters, British style police work (a lot less spectacular than what we see in American movies) and last but not least the ugly female characters (you probably have to be British to appreciate their beauty).

9/10 from me, such productions have to be encouraged. It was a pleasant surprise and I'm eagerly expecting the next episode.
  • vladimir898909
  • 10 déc. 2009
  • Permalien
9/10

Available now on Amazon Prime

Great concept, a physicist receives 8 images and he and the police was figure out what they mean. Wharf coming back for again and again.
  • berrebi555
  • 23 août 2019
  • Permalien
8/10

Intriguing sci-fi, too short

Very good sci-fi tv show. Like the two part concept of trying to decipher picture clues to prevent the event and the theories of, where did the future pictures come from...how? ....why? > Somebody said there is no finale, so may not get an answer which is not fair.
  • kdupes-1
  • 4 mai 2020
  • Permalien
3/10

Interesting idea, horrible execution, lame acting, lame direction, shallow

I refuse to believe the police in England are as incompetent as they are depicted here. I refuse to believe the police in England are as stupid as they are depicted here. This show is just one or two steps away from being a Keystone Cops series. The acting was bad; I think the actors themselves didn't buy into the laughable story line. The bleach blonde hair on the female cop lead made her look stupid. The lead scientist character was so poorly written; pity the actor who had to play that role. This series deserved to die. What a horrible implementation of a good concept.
  • jmw111085
  • 28 févr. 2021
  • Permalien

En savoir plus sur ce titre

Découvrir

Récemment consultés

Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
Obtenir l'application IMDb
Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
Obtenir l'application IMDb
Pour Android et iOS
Obtenir l'application IMDb
  • Aide
  • Index du site
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Licence de données IMDb
  • Salle de presse
  • Annonces
  • Emplois
  • Conditions d'utilisation
  • Politique de confidentialité
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, une société Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.