2050

NOTE IMDb

3,8/10

1,3 k

MA NOTE

Lire trailer1:02

2 Videos

99+ photos

Intelligence artificielle Science-fiction dystopique Drame Fantaisie Science-fiction

Un père de famille avec plein de problèmes dans sa vie découvre un salon caché qui offre une solution - des sexbots.Un père de famille avec plein de problèmes dans sa vie découvre un salon caché qui offre une solution - des sexbots.Un père de famille avec plein de problèmes dans sa vie découvre un salon caché qui offre une solution - des sexbots.

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

NOTE IMDb

3,8/10

1,3 k

MA NOTE

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

Récompenses
- 16 victoires au total

Vidéos2

Photos587

+ 583

Avis des utilisateurs38

3,81.3K

Avis à la une

4bemyfriend-40184

Funny, but Inconclusive

I guess my title says it all. Parts of this well crafted rom-com made me laugh out loud. But yeah, there was no real conclusion; to the story, or to the moral/ethical questions. Towards the end of the film, I could see that the writers really didn't have a point to make; or a conclusion to reach. I lost interest, and the movie lost 4 stars. Seen on Tubi, the free streaming site; which has an odd assortment of films, and now, live TV.

5troy-boulton

Not Dean Cain's worst film in the last decade

It's not a new premise by any measure, but the narrative and dialogue has enough originality to hold some interest. There are moments of brilliance in the cinematography, like islands in a sea of low budget mediocrity. "Futurising" the present by dropping in the odd cheesy special effect really doesn't work; either go all the way, or be way more subtle. This is just disjointed world-building that drops the viewer out of the story.

The acting and dialogue is like the cinematography. Inconsistent. Moments of beauty and powerful nuance, drowning in acres of awkward and stilted.

I'm glad Dean can still get work. I've always had a soft spot for him. He's not a great actor, and his 50+ years sans A-grade Hollywood cosmetic surgery/stylist/nutritionist/trainer budget are showing, but he seems like such a nice guy. He deserves a shot, and this film shows not all hope is lost.

Andrew-Props

Ehhhhhh!

With the exception of Dean Cain, the acting was not very good, the soundtrack was silly and the actor playing the brother was awful and seemed gay. (Not there there is anything wrong with that!) The concept for the film is a good one but the dialogue seemed unnatural, the music was distracting and overall this movie was a waste of time! The only difference in the future in New York City seems to be drones.... Lots of drones!!!

I think this could have been a much better movie in spite of being low budget... maybe the writer and director learn from this movie and do better next time... just like Ed Wood said! 😁🎥🎬

4fagurado

Sort of interesting, but amateurish at times

It is an entertaining film, although it doesn't explore the topic in depth - the subject of the film is "people spending more time with robots than with humans", but the implications of that are never really explored, at least no more than it would be if we were talking about people dating other people because they are more excited about the perspective of dating somewhere more attractive than their current partners. Acting is okay, but it can be rough at some points, making it feel like a low-budget production.

But hey, you get to see Stormi Maya naked, and you don't have to pay to subscribe to her OnlyFans. Nudity is always a plus.

2orleanslady

Remake of Cherry 2000

While some elements are different, it is essentially a remake made to appear different. Sorry Cherry 2000 from the 80's is better than this film

Histoire

Modifier

Le saviez-vous

Modifier

Anecdotes
Stefanie Bloom believes that many of the topics addressed in the film will be real before the eponymous year of 2050.

Citations
Alli: If you control the people, you control the world. They tried everything they could to try to control us. Because they know we are emotional people. They tried to divide us by playing on our emotions. You know why, right? Because, if you keep the people emotional and angry you distract them from building their own financial empires and taking care of their families, and their family's families. I mean, think about it, bro. First you program people emotionally, right? Next you destroy their health. The best way to do that is through the food and water supply. I mean, Henry Kissinger snitched on the whole operation. He said, "If you control the oil, you control the country." "And if you control the food, you control the population." So now we've been programmed to rely on microchips more than we rely on each other. We no longer talk to each other, we only follow each other online, what? But this, this is the remedy. This is how we get back to our roots. This is how we bring humanity back to our essence, I mean, guys, oh. Just take this.