Mommy's Deadly Con Artist

Terrible plot, Terrible acting!!! Where on earth do they find these bad actors? And sad to see these very young actresses with surgery 'enhanced' faces!

This movie was absolutely a waste of time. The acting was totally horrendous...almost funny at times. I just can't believe I wasted 90 minutes of my life that I can never get back.

Mommy's Deadly Con Artist.... Dumb movie, waste of film. On a lighter note, this movie proves that anyone can get a job as an actor, even if they live several towns away. And, anyone else can get a job as a writer. Although the plot had potential, it failed.

Story picked up with the ending of "Deceived by My Mother-In-Law", and brought back Dey Young, Jackee Harry, and Rib Hillis' characters. (Michael Pare was brought back in a flashback.)

However, this story seemed a little flat and unconvincing.

Look for -

1. Dey Young's character (Maggie) walking around in pants that look painted on - honey, that doesn't look too good on folks that are 65-ish.

2. Chelsea Gilson's outfits throughout the movie - very sexy for someone who's supposed to be with child.

3. Jackee Harry - she appeared to be billed in a starring role by her screen time was minimal.

4. Eric Roberts playing a sleazebag doctor.

5. The LAME ending - it looks like it was tacked on.

LMN, please do not continue the con-artist mommy movies - - maybe try con-artist DADDIES!.

Same movie except this time, the mark is a male with a con artist fiancee instead of a lady with a con artist husband. These were clearly filmed in succession and based on the ending, this will be a trilogy at least.

Jackee Harry's character is the connecting thread to this because she's obviously the only character who realizes what's going on. The movie picks up with them killing her husband from the last movie but the first movie does the "one year later" thing. I can't remember a mention of her client that was the victim in the last and the other characters don't make an appearance. I also think it was strange that they pulled the con in the same place.

I think it's worth a watch ONLY if you've watched Deceived and so much is the same (they do add characters), that you don't even have to pay close attention. I don't think there's anything to spoil because it's so similar to the first. I won't deny that I'll probably watch the third movie if they produce it. Seems likely based on the ending.