Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueScientists explore how Earth would transform if humans vanished, from ecosystem recovery to surviving structures and fastest decay. Based on expert analysis of our industrial world without p... Tout lireScientists explore how Earth would transform if humans vanished, from ecosystem recovery to surviving structures and fastest decay. Based on expert analysis of our industrial world without people.Scientists explore how Earth would transform if humans vanished, from ecosystem recovery to surviving structures and fastest decay. Based on expert analysis of our industrial world without people.
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
One of my all time favourite documentary tv shows. The show much like National Geographics Aftermath Population Zero was inspired by the book The World Without Us by Alan Weisman. But to bad that this series only ran for 2 seasons.
I Love seeing how nature could make a comeback in a big way if humans just somehow stop the destruction. But just as in Aftermath and The World Without Us, In this show it is if humans all disappeared for some unknown reason. Love how they back up their beliefs with evidence.
Nine minutes in to the very first episode, one of the experts shares an anecdote about an explorers club in 1950 cooking up the frozen carcass of the long-extinct mammoth. It is presented, without question, as an actual true event to help illustrate how long flesh can survive for in the right conditions.
Except, this never happened. It was a hoax by the chef. A sample of the meal was subsequently tested and shown to be sea turtle. The myth though, still persists and this show has tried to turn that myth into scientific fact.
So my question is: if, in the first 9 minutes of a 20 episode show they make this glaring error / lie, then what else that they present as fact is also nonsense?
It completely destroyed any credibility this show had. Shame, because the subject matter itself is fascinating
Except, this never happened. It was a hoax by the chef. A sample of the meal was subsequently tested and shown to be sea turtle. The myth though, still persists and this show has tried to turn that myth into scientific fact.
So my question is: if, in the first 9 minutes of a 20 episode show they make this glaring error / lie, then what else that they present as fact is also nonsense?
It completely destroyed any credibility this show had. Shame, because the subject matter itself is fascinating
I used to like NGC. However, all of their shows and simulations are the same over and over. They inject CC into everyone of their shows.
The narrator on this show is also annoying. I think he is similar to many of NGC shows. A narrator is fine... but it shouldn't be involved in 50% of the show... and emphasizing every other word gets really annoying.
The simulations are awful, even when the shows were made. I think it is more comical than knowledgeable.
If you watch the shows, you will see repetitive simulations on each show.
There are much better ways to learn about the universe, science and out planet. NGC always slides CC into the conversation.
Sad...
The narrator on this show is also annoying. I think he is similar to many of NGC shows. A narrator is fine... but it shouldn't be involved in 50% of the show... and emphasizing every other word gets really annoying.
The simulations are awful, even when the shows were made. I think it is more comical than knowledgeable.
If you watch the shows, you will see repetitive simulations on each show.
There are much better ways to learn about the universe, science and out planet. NGC always slides CC into the conversation.
Sad...
I am not sure that the series doesn't just use snippets of the original show, I have seen some episodes where I think I saw the same thing on the show. It is entertaining, and shouldn't be taken too seriously. I have a problem, as many have already argued, that the scenario for the absence of humans is not given any thought. Therein lies the problem with the show and series, you can't really speculate on what happens the hour, week, month after people if you don't explain what happened to neutralize humans around the world at the same time. If we do become extinct, it would more likely be phased out. Anything drastic enough to destroy us all would certainly destroy other forms of life too. Anyway, sometimes when channel surfing, this is about the best thing on, and worth a watch or two.
Loved first two seasons but the new seasons have lousy CG and AI. It is so fake looking. The dogs don't even look right when they show them eating...how hard could that be to do right? Sad to drop the quality so much from the original. And, they are claiming catastrophic changes in just a couple of weeks. In the first seasons it took years for building collapses. So far I am disappointed in the new version.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesNational Geographic had a similar show called Aftermath followed by a tv special titled Aftermath Population Zero.
- ConnexionsFeatured in L'Univers: Stopping Armageddon (2009)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Life After People have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Life After People
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 45min
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1 / (high definition)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant