Vampire Girl vs Frankenstein Girl

"Frankenstein Girl vs. Vampire Girl" was scheduled at the Belgian International Festival of Fantastic Films on a Saturday night at 2 o'clock in the morning, in other words when the horror crowd is at its most numerous and wildly enthusiastic to see bloodshed, dementia and extreme sickness. And what an excellent choice it was! The people went berserk along with the absurd and totally eccentric characters in this 200% bonkers movie from the creators of "Tokyo Gore Police" and "The One-Armed Machine Girl". The emphasis more than obviously lies on the splatter orgies and nefarious sense of humor, but there's actually also a decent storyline hidden underneath all the mayhem, with interesting lead characters and the craziest bunch of sub plots you've ever witnessed. Monami, the beautiful new girl in school, falls in love with the shy school stud Jyugon and immediately makes him hers by offering a Valentine's Day chocolate with her own blood as filling. For you see, Monami is a vampire girl and pretty much demands Jyugon to happily live with her for all eternity. Jyugon is already the boyfriend of schoolgirl gang leader Keiko, but she obviously cannot compete with the vampire powers of Monami. That is to say, until Keiko dies and her deranged principal father transforms her body into Frankenstein girl; composed of bits and parts of other students. The best and most entertaining things about "Frankenstein Girl vs. Vampire Girl" are the extended introduction of the supportive characters. We have a gang of Japanese girls that desperately want to be black ghetto girls, the girls preparing for the annual wrist-cutting tournament, the creepily hunchbacked janitor and a nymphomaniac school nurse. The first half of the film is non-stop outrageous, but naturally the tempo and level of viewer's engagement drops down a little after that simply because you're adapting to the weirdness. The climatic battle – fought out on top of the school's very own imitated Eiffel Tower – is sublimely over the top again. The gore and splatter effects are extreme and brutal, but simultaneously very campy and light-headed. It's not exactly the type of movie that is out to shock or offend people, merely just to entertain them in the most tasteless, pulpy and brainless fashion.

And then some. This movie is definitely not something for the faint hearted. It also is not politically correct and some might call it on some racism issues (especially how Africans are depicted in this movie). But that wouldn't be what this movie is about. It makes fun of everything it gets it's hands on (even suicide gets a "stab", no pun intended).

And this will define, how much you dis/like the movie. Can you handle all that craziness or do you want your movies more straight forward? If you are one of the latter kind, you shouldn't really watch this movie or at least not expect too much from it. Some crazy ideas and almost entirely over the top, this is made for fans of Machine Girl and other recent Japanese Horror fare/thrillers (or those who are on the verge of becoming one)

This movie grew on me as it progressed. A lot of the characters and their sub stories seems manic and disjointed. The wrist cutters, the ganguro girls (sorta like whiggers) etc. I have to admit I nearly gave up on the movie part way through.

The way the director ties the sub characters together actually works though...basically Frankenstein girl - body parts. The action is badly done as usual with fountains and fountains of blood. The comedic elements so-so.

The acting was actually OK, Vampire girl (Yukie Kawamura) does seem alittle old to be playing a high school girl but she has a certain cuteness and charm in her scenes. She also looks good splattered with blood.

This movie isn't as dark and gruesome as some of the gore movies out there. It also isn't as fun as some of the "comedic" gore movies as well. I give this movie a marginal pass 'cos I found Yukie Kawamura to be cute and it was a slightly different slant to the usual gore plots.

Not knowing anything about the manga or this adaptation, the only thing I could say about the flick as I sat to watch was that the name and fundamental premise sounded like fun. For better or for worse, this also kindly informs just what we're getting into with the opening scene alone: abject low-grade cartoonishness that technically fulfills the promise of a splatter "horror-comedy" while not specifically being either horrifying or funny, and practical effects including proliferate blood and gore that are shamelessly augmented with the mid-2000s computer-generated imagery that has emphatically aged poorly. Brought to bear within even just the next couple scenes, there is also a significant parodying element here that would probably be more meaningful to someone who lives in Japan rather than anyone who lives anywhere outside the archipelago - not least as the notions being parodied include youth fashion that is questionable (Lolita) or outright objectionable (the ganguro style that at its most extreme is simply blackface taken to a deeply offensive new level). Moreover, between the bare-faced production values, the obvious CGI, Nishimura Yoshihiro and Tomomatsu Naoyuki's brashly forthright and immoderate direction, and in turn the pointedly unsubtle acting, cinematography, and editing, the nearest comparisons one may drum up are the Z-grade dreck of The Asylum, or the most outrageous, "devil may care" flippancy of the far reaches of amateur horror. 'Vampire Girl vs. Frankenstein Girl' sure is a thing.

None of this definitively precludes the possibility of the film being enjoyable. After all, as Nishimura adapts the source material, there are plenty of good, ridiculous ideas in the narrative itself. The core characters of Monami, Keiko, and Mizushima are all minor joys, not to mention Keiko's "vice principal but also mad scientist" father. The sheer irreverent ludicrousness of the characters, and of the scene writing and plot they feed into, are ripe for absurdist or even surrealist entertainment in line with exploitation flicks of the 70s and the "video nasties" of the 80s. I appreciate the absolute gusto that everyone contributed in their individual capacities, whether that means that blood and gore, the overwrought and ham-handed music, the downright garish costume design, hair, makeup, and production design and art direction - and, sure, even the editing, the cinematography, the acting, the direction, and maybe even that CGI. I don't believe all such inclusions, guided to the ends that they were, represented the best choices, but all involved clearly knew what the assignment was and they unreservedly embraced the preposterous tenor. With that said, I do think some aspects are perfectly unnecessary. Chiefly, those cultural tidbits that get parodied serve no purpose whatsoever in the storytelling, least of all the racist ganguro club. They are present with no importance to speak of, and the gratuitous inclusion instead does nothing more than to diminish the potential of whatever it is that this feature could have ideally been.

And, well, as to the rest - the reality of the utmost boorishness, juvenility, kitsch, chutzpah, bombast, and intemperance? The oversexed school nurse and her secret role, the pure bluster of that mad scientist, the buckets of blood and gore that are sometimes plainly senseless even relative to the likes of Peter Jackson's 'Dead-alive,' the very tongue-in-cheek and over the top music, the almost pointless fragments of more distinctly earnest and careful storytelling, and so on? There really are great ideas in these eighty-five minutes. And ultimately, if Nishimura and Tomomatsu had reined in the excess and self-indulgence just a smidgen, and had approached the concept and its realization with more genuine, mindful care, then maybe 'Vampire Girl vs. Frankenstein Girl' would have earnestly been better. For all the possibilities of the premise, for all the good cheer of the splatter flick ideations, for as much as all involved were very apparently enjoying themselves, and for what wild, wacky fun the picture does have to offer, there would be more lasting value here if equal skill and intelligence had been applied uniformly throughout the runtime. As it is, the result comes off far too much not as the wholly frivolous but merry B-grade romp that it could and should have been, but as a dodgy, dubious, low-born creation that wasn't shaped with enough of the discerning eye that would have allowed its best imagination, creativity, and hard work to flourish. I actually do like this, but because its profligacy wasn't modulated, my favor is.

For what the title does well, I want to like it more than I do. For what the title declined to have conjured or executed with more thought or judicious consideration, maybe I'm being too generous in my assessment. We get what we came for and 'Vampire Girl vs. Frankenstein Girl' never pretends to be anything that it's not. I just also see how it could have been readily improved: probably by more fully leaning into the unmistakable inspiration and predilection for tangible creations that we see from Jackson (in his early years), Brian Yuzna, or especially Stuart Gordon; possibly by giving it treatment not as a "live-action" movie, but instead as a gnarly anime in which anything and everything would have been more feasible; but almost certainly not by mixing the bottom-dollar CGI, green screen artificiality, and production values with the extravagant practical effects and special makeup, and with the unfettered cartoonishness that so much of the endeavor represents. It's okay, when all is said and done, but overbearing, and the problem is that it could have been fantastic. Alas. Don't go out of your way for this, and be well aware of the nature of what you're getting into, but if nothing I've noted has set off your alarm bells, then maybe 'Vampire Girl vs. Frankenstein Girl' is just the lark you want for a lazy day.

There's some good, some bad, and a lot of ugly to be found in Vampire Girl vs. Frankenstein Girl. The ugliness is the point. It's trashy and obscenely gory and all made in very bad taste. Well, the bad taste kind of leads to the bad, actually. I think it went a little far in being provocative with some side characters, and some of its humor would be the kind some might excuse teenagers making (then again, maybe not), but it's just kind of sad to see a film made by adults go there. The tiniest amount of slack can be cut for the bad taste being the point, but still, there are barriers here some won't overcome. I half thought about not going on with it, even though the opening scene was incredible.

The final act kind of justifies the heinous stuff. It doesn't justify that stuff well, but there's something approaching a point to it all. And the final act is fun in a similar way to the opening scene. It delivers on showing a fight between Vampire Girl vs. Frankenstein Girl (over a boy they both love, at that); that can't be denied. Seeing the assistants of the monsters get their own fight was fun, too. It would be funny to travel back in time and screen this in the 1930s or '40s, to a crowd of people expecting a Universal Monsters versus movie, just to see how people would react (and count how many people would pass out).

Probably don't watch this, if you're most people. It's almost kind of good in so far as delivering what it promises in the title, and for having some genuinely insane stuff. The gory violence is wild, and some of the monster designs are quite impressive. I think some of this film is awful, but some of it's quite funny and entertaining. Enter at your own risk.