Après une transaction de drogue qui a mal tourné, un détective meurtri doit se frayer un chemin dans le monde criminel pour sauver le fils d'un politicien dont il est séparé, démêlant ainsi ... Tout lireAprès une transaction de drogue qui a mal tourné, un détective meurtri doit se frayer un chemin dans le monde criminel pour sauver le fils d'un politicien dont il est séparé, démêlant ainsi un réseau de corruption et de conspiration.Après une transaction de drogue qui a mal tourné, un détective meurtri doit se frayer un chemin dans le monde criminel pour sauver le fils d'un politicien dont il est séparé, démêlant ainsi un réseau de corruption et de conspiration.
Avis à la une
The lighting was awful too, CGI was shockingly bad. Most of the city night sequences looked like cheap video game cutscenes rather than a real movie. At times I honestly forgot I was watching a film and not some low budget game from a decade ago.
After the opening chase, I seriously considered turning it off. It felt like a bad video game come to life - unpolished, incoherent, and completely lacking any real atmosphere or tension even the car physics looked so bad and video game likish
Disappointing is an understatement.
All it is, is a chain of uninteresting bad guys (and bad girls) running around in an ugly scenery beating each other up and killing each other. Maybe it's just me, but I was bored.
4 Stars because it's Tom Hardy. But it's time they upgrade him to what he really deserves. 007 Maybe?
However, the film fails on almost every other level. It has no real meaning or depth, which makes it hard to get invested. As a result, it also lacks real tension.
On top of that, the movie is filled with irrelevant characters and side plots, making it hard to follow at times.
Tom Hardy delivers a solid performance as always, but he's given almost nothing to work with here.
Unfortunately, this one is only recommended for hardcore action enthusiasts.
Clearly something must have happened to the original execution of this movie. It was quietly delayed for years and was released on streaming just as quietly. It's certainly no "Raid", it's more like a tired Jason Statham type movie. Some of the things in it are plain bizzare, such as the setting. This feels like Gotham or some alternative version of RoboCop's Detroit. The CGI is awful, it's so weird it us even present here in such copious amounts considering what the director is known for. The story is simple, yet indescribably odd. The lighting is also a weak point of this movie. The casting is superb and some of the fights are fine, but again, coming from Gareth Evans it's a bare minimum of what you'd expect. This isn't a terrible movie by any stretch and you can enjoy it for what it turned out to be, but you have to keep your expectations surprisingly low.
The highlight of the movie is probably the club fight with Gesaffelstein blasting, but that's as good as it gets. Overall, pretty passable.
Tom Hardy Through the Years
Tom Hardy Through the Years
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesCardiff Bay streets were transformed to resemble snowy American cityscapes for the production.
- GaffesThe characters use firearms that seemingly have unlimited ammunition, firing hundreds of rounds, even from handguns, without ever reloading.
- Citations
Lawrence Beaumont: Get him back.
Walker: And I never see your fuckin' face again?
Lawrence Beaumont: You heard me.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 990: Sinners (2025)
- Bandes originalesThe Mysterious Hiace
Written by The Low Mays & Bakerie
Performed by The Low Mays & Bakerie
Courtesy of CWA Records Limited
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Havoc?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Havoc
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 47 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1