NOTE IMDb
3,3/10
2,3 k
MA NOTE
L'équipage d'un bateau accoste sur une île mystérieuse pleine de créatures préhistoriques. Ils croisent rapidement d'autres survivants qui se sont échoués au cours des années.L'équipage d'un bateau accoste sur une île mystérieuse pleine de créatures préhistoriques. Ils croisent rapidement d'autres survivants qui se sont échoués au cours des années.L'équipage d'un bateau accoste sur une île mystérieuse pleine de créatures préhistoriques. Ils croisent rapidement d'autres survivants qui se sont échoués au cours des années.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Christopher Showerman
- Stack
- (as Chris Showerman)
Avis à la une
I really wanted to like this movie as I have always liked C. Thomas Howell but unfortunately I can't say that I liked it. I can say that I watched it, but that's about it.
I was able to sit through it and that may be the best that Howell can hope for. The dialog was a bit unimportant and even somewhat silly at times. The whole thing seemed like a compromise - which I am sure to some degree (as with anything under budget constraints) it was.
There was no effort exhausted in building characters that you could care about or for that matter knew anything about. When someone got killed you just did not care - at all.
The more fascinating and cerebral aspects of this story were completely glossed over or avoided altogether; although I did find it interesting that there was a brief discussion on the details of refining petroleum. which I had expected would be ignored (okay in movies I guess).
Overall, it barely held my attention and came off as another lame Sci-Fi channel, low budget, bad CG feature.
Don't get me wrong, there were some things to like, but I think in this case, Howell probably had his hands tied as far as time/money are concerned and more money/time could have been invested in script, effects and filming.
I was able to sit through it and that may be the best that Howell can hope for. The dialog was a bit unimportant and even somewhat silly at times. The whole thing seemed like a compromise - which I am sure to some degree (as with anything under budget constraints) it was.
There was no effort exhausted in building characters that you could care about or for that matter knew anything about. When someone got killed you just did not care - at all.
The more fascinating and cerebral aspects of this story were completely glossed over or avoided altogether; although I did find it interesting that there was a brief discussion on the details of refining petroleum. which I had expected would be ignored (okay in movies I guess).
Overall, it barely held my attention and came off as another lame Sci-Fi channel, low budget, bad CG feature.
Don't get me wrong, there were some things to like, but I think in this case, Howell probably had his hands tied as far as time/money are concerned and more money/time could have been invested in script, effects and filming.
I just watched it, absolutely awful.
This movie had terrible acting, dumb situations, and just... well....
Hardly any action, 1 boring dinosaur used twice, lol, well, other than 2 dead ones and a quickie underwater one, and 1 flying pterodactyl.
C. Thomas Howell and Bottoms acting were just bad.
They should be ashamed of themselves for not putting in more dinosaurs and cool stuff. I saw more action in the 1970's TV show land of the lost.
Watch the old 1960's version, way better.
Watch this version only if free and every other channel has infomercials on.
This movie had terrible acting, dumb situations, and just... well....
Hardly any action, 1 boring dinosaur used twice, lol, well, other than 2 dead ones and a quickie underwater one, and 1 flying pterodactyl.
C. Thomas Howell and Bottoms acting were just bad.
They should be ashamed of themselves for not putting in more dinosaurs and cool stuff. I saw more action in the 1970's TV show land of the lost.
Watch the old 1960's version, way better.
Watch this version only if free and every other channel has infomercials on.
The original film and the novel were and still are a favourite of mine.
Unfortunately this 2009 remake is possibly the worst film I have ever seen. Terrible acting. Even worse effects. Oh dear
I don't understand all the terrible reviews. It wasn't the greatest movie that I have ever seen, but it was entertaining enough.
This movie fails on almost every possible level:
Bad acting: check.
Poor direction: check.
Hackneyed script: check.
Painfully bad CG: check.
Odd pacing: check.
Timothy Bottoms looking embarrassed and wondering when he can go home and start drinking: check.
Run screaming, tripping and flailing away from this sad attempt at a movie.
Bad acting: check.
Poor direction: check.
Hackneyed script: check.
Painfully bad CG: check.
Odd pacing: check.
Timothy Bottoms looking embarrassed and wondering when he can go home and start drinking: check.
Run screaming, tripping and flailing away from this sad attempt at a movie.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesReleased on July 28th, 2009 to capitalize on Le monde (presque) perdu (2009), which was released in the U.S. on June 5th, 2009.
- GaffesAll of the equipment used by the World War II German U-boat crew, most notably the small arms, are of American manufacture.
- Versions alternativesThe original release contained narration by Frost during the main title. This was removed from subsequent releases.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Celebrity Sex Tape (2012)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Les Rescapés du monde perdu
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 600 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 28min(88 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant