Une initiation de gang tourne mal lorsqu'un groupe de quatre recrues s'introduit dans une maison de l'horreur, alors qu'ils sont tous forcés de jouer à des jeux mortels pour leur vie. Gagnez... Tout lireUne initiation de gang tourne mal lorsqu'un groupe de quatre recrues s'introduit dans une maison de l'horreur, alors qu'ils sont tous forcés de jouer à des jeux mortels pour leur vie. Gagnez et vous vivrez - perdez et vous mourrez.Une initiation de gang tourne mal lorsqu'un groupe de quatre recrues s'introduit dans une maison de l'horreur, alors qu'ils sont tous forcés de jouer à des jeux mortels pour leur vie. Gagnez et vous vivrez - perdez et vous mourrez.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire au total
Me'Lisa Sellers
- Marsia
- (as Me'lisa Sellers)
Avis à la une
This film manages to carve out a niche for itself with a story that showcases some inventive ideas despite its limited budget. While it's commendable how the film attempts to make the most of its resources, there are several areas where it falls short, leaving it more of a mixed bag than a standout feature.
One of the film's strengths is its approach to storytelling. The premise is intriguing, and it's clear that the filmmakers put thought into crafting a narrative that stands apart from more conventional fare. The story, while not without its merits, does offer a refreshing change of pace and keeps you engaged with its unique plot twists. It's evident that the filmmakers tried to make the best out of what they had, and for that, they deserve some credit.
However, the positives are overshadowed by several notable shortcomings. The performances, unfortunately, leave much to be desired. While the cast tries to bring their characters to life, the acting often feels wooden and unconvincing, detracting from the film's overall impact. This lack of strong performances means that emotional moments fall flat, and it becomes difficult to fully invest in the characters or their fates.
The cinematography is another area where the film struggles. The film suffers from inconsistent visual quality, with some scenes poorly lit or awkwardly framed. This uneven cinematography takes away from the immersion and can make the viewing experience feel jarring at times. Instead of enhancing the atmosphere, it often feels like a missed opportunity to elevate the film's impact.
Moreover, the plot contains a number of implausibilities that can be hard to overlook. The story takes several leaps in logic that stretch credibility, making it difficult to stay fully engaged. These implausibilities, combined with some clumsy storytelling choices, result in a narrative that, while ambitious, ultimately feels strained and unconvincing.
In conclusion, this is a film that showcases some creativity and makes an admirable effort with its limited budget. However, its shortcomings in performance, cinematography, and plausibility hinder its overall effectiveness. It's a mixed bag that might appeal to those who appreciate unique stories despite their execution flaws, but for many, it might be a case of good intentions falling short of a fully realized execution.
One of the film's strengths is its approach to storytelling. The premise is intriguing, and it's clear that the filmmakers put thought into crafting a narrative that stands apart from more conventional fare. The story, while not without its merits, does offer a refreshing change of pace and keeps you engaged with its unique plot twists. It's evident that the filmmakers tried to make the best out of what they had, and for that, they deserve some credit.
However, the positives are overshadowed by several notable shortcomings. The performances, unfortunately, leave much to be desired. While the cast tries to bring their characters to life, the acting often feels wooden and unconvincing, detracting from the film's overall impact. This lack of strong performances means that emotional moments fall flat, and it becomes difficult to fully invest in the characters or their fates.
The cinematography is another area where the film struggles. The film suffers from inconsistent visual quality, with some scenes poorly lit or awkwardly framed. This uneven cinematography takes away from the immersion and can make the viewing experience feel jarring at times. Instead of enhancing the atmosphere, it often feels like a missed opportunity to elevate the film's impact.
Moreover, the plot contains a number of implausibilities that can be hard to overlook. The story takes several leaps in logic that stretch credibility, making it difficult to stay fully engaged. These implausibilities, combined with some clumsy storytelling choices, result in a narrative that, while ambitious, ultimately feels strained and unconvincing.
In conclusion, this is a film that showcases some creativity and makes an admirable effort with its limited budget. However, its shortcomings in performance, cinematography, and plausibility hinder its overall effectiveness. It's a mixed bag that might appeal to those who appreciate unique stories despite their execution flaws, but for many, it might be a case of good intentions falling short of a fully realized execution.
Three young guys and a young woman are attempting to join a local gang and for their initiation they must break into a house and rob a stash of cash for the gang leader.
One of them, Q, is a good kid with a mother with high expectations for him.
Against her wishws, he joins up witht he group to earn their respect and make some much needed cash in the process.
Of course, the plan goes from bad to worse as Badass, the title character has other ideas and, one by one, will amke the intruders play a series of games against him fr their very lives.
The cast, especially Q's mother, are all very good and some laughs are provided along the way.
Tony Todd does the intro in the style of the Crypt Keeper from the old HBO series from the eighties.
Bitch Ass is a short and passable diversion.
One of them, Q, is a good kid with a mother with high expectations for him.
Against her wishws, he joins up witht he group to earn their respect and make some much needed cash in the process.
Of course, the plan goes from bad to worse as Badass, the title character has other ideas and, one by one, will amke the intruders play a series of games against him fr their very lives.
The cast, especially Q's mother, are all very good and some laughs are provided along the way.
Tony Todd does the intro in the style of the Crypt Keeper from the old HBO series from the eighties.
Bitch Ass is a short and passable diversion.
Notice how the 8 and over star reviewers have only reviewed 1 movie? It's because they worked on this movie or know someone who did. The lighting is horrible, the acting is weak, it's not original. The only thing original about this is that it's an all black cast. If you're looking for a dumb movie to watch, because you have nothing else to watch, just watch nothing. It would be better than this trash. The only reason I gave it 3 stars is because people actually took time out of their lives to make this movie. I cant knock the hustle, but I'm knocking the outcome. I was cringing from the very beginning. Trying way too hard to be "hip" and "original" when it's far from it. Take my advice and watch Zombeavers instead.
I was stuck for something to watch and I found this on one of many many streaming platforms here in the UK.
I checked the reviews on here and I can assure you this is a real review from a real person lol this is NO way as bad as people on here have made out.
I'm not gonna spoil it but if The People Under The Stairs is a 10 and Bones is a 1 this is easily a 6. With the late great Tony Todd playing the role as the "Crypt Keeper" I knew it couldn't be all bad.
The actual story is quite good. The acting is as really not that bad. It's cheesy like any anthology show of that era was.
The villain wasn't all that bad. He had a good backstory.
All in all was pretty good. Wouldn't watch it again, but definitely worth one watch.
I checked the reviews on here and I can assure you this is a real review from a real person lol this is NO way as bad as people on here have made out.
I'm not gonna spoil it but if The People Under The Stairs is a 10 and Bones is a 1 this is easily a 6. With the late great Tony Todd playing the role as the "Crypt Keeper" I knew it couldn't be all bad.
The actual story is quite good. The acting is as really not that bad. It's cheesy like any anthology show of that era was.
The villain wasn't all that bad. He had a good backstory.
All in all was pretty good. Wouldn't watch it again, but definitely worth one watch.
A lot of negative reviews but I thought it was much better than a lot of low budget movies of this type that still spawned sequels- Sleepaway Camp ring a bell anyone? I also recall one of the best classics ever originally being panned by critical when it first came out, the original Evil Dead. While this is far from being in that category it still has its moments and may be a classic in the making, who knows? I'm impressed that it was as good as it was being the extremely low budget it was under, especially having a known celebrity as Tony Todd as part of the cast. I've come across so many horror movies on the streaming services where I couldn't watch any more than a half hours worth before turning them off, especially with the horrible acting involved, which was not the case here. All actors involved did seem to be much better than what you'd expect, that's for sure! But you can make your own decision.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFilmed with a shoe-string budget of less than $30,000.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Bitch Ass?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 25 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant