Porky's IV: Pimpin' Pee Wee

I know, they only made the movie because they wanted mountain the legal rights and whatever. Had they gotten their 10 million desperately needed for this movie, it probably would have been alot better. But with only 1 million to deal with? Well, it's slightly below average (even for a porky's movie) which is saying something! Could it had been alot better even with the low budget? Sure. But in order to break even, they got the ex porn stars to appear in it.Doesn't always work. And clearly, just needs to be forgotten altogether.

I just watched "Porky's: Pimpin' Pee-wee* and it was better than I expected.

Pee-wee, Tommy and Meat are back during summer break from college. Pee-wee is watching his uncle's house while he's gone on a trip. Tommy decides that it's the perfect place and time to party.

One evening the guys go to Porky's for a good time. Tommy befriends Porky's daughter. She and some of her friends party and hangout with Tommy, Pee-Wee, and Meat.

When some of Pee-wee's uncle's antiques are damaged, Porky's daughter, Shelley comes up with a way for Pee-wee to make enough money to pay for the damaged items. See, Shelley has some ideas on how to run Porky's, but Porky ignores her ideas, so she decides to put them into play at Pee-wee's uncle's house.

I actually laughed quite a bit watching this. I enjoy raunchy, juvenile humor.

One thing I couldn't help but notice is that the film takes place in modern times. Did they forget that the original Porky's trilogy was set in the 1950s?

Anyway despite the low ratings, I enjoyed this flick and think it's worth viewing at least once.

Maybe they forgot, Porky's was set in the 50's. Maybe it's their grandsons.

Horrible. Ive waited years for either a remake of Porky's or just the next one in line but this was an awful movie. The only decent actor was the kid who played Tommy. The storyline didn't make much sense because it's supposed to be the same Porky's bar but in a new building and under new management yet all the main characters have the same names as the characters in the original films. The shower scene in the original had attractive supposed high school girls, who were somewhat believable , but this one had girls who look as though they've been rode hard and put up wet, then had multiple kids, then rode hard and put up wet again before being beaten with an ugly stick. The only attractive females in this film were the two main girls who were just so so at best. The acting was horrible and I mean really bad. The originals had a fan base that could have made this film a hit had it had the budget to have been cast ,directed, and produced correctly. This was as disappointing as the Ghostbusters Melissa McCartney was in and the only way it could have been worse is if you cast her as one of the characters with nude scenes . Should have waited to make this film until the money was there and a decent script was available.

Some terrible reboot/remake. Nothing else really to say.