NOTE IMDb
4,3/10
6,6 k
MA NOTE
Une jeune femme libère des démons terrifiants lorsque des forces surnaturelles à l'origine d'une rupture vieille de plusieurs décennies entre mère et fille sont impitoyablement révélées.Une jeune femme libère des démons terrifiants lorsque des forces surnaturelles à l'origine d'une rupture vieille de plusieurs décennies entre mère et fille sont impitoyablement révélées.Une jeune femme libère des démons terrifiants lorsque des forces surnaturelles à l'origine d'une rupture vieille de plusieurs décennies entre mère et fille sont impitoyablement révélées.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 nominations au total
Michael J Rogers
- Michael
- (as Michael J. Rogers)
Christopher Wardrop
- Detective
- (as Chris Froese)
Andrea Agur
- Cashier
- (non crédité)
Nelson Conway
- Venatores soldier
- (non crédité)
Emma Jonnz
- Dominique
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
WTF did I just watch? This isnt the Neil I remember. It felt like watching a low quality horror sci fi flick. Every Neil short movie and movie shows all the violence and chaos but this just skips over everything. The acting was good but this just isnt it. Very disappointing.
You'll know it's bad when they enter a VR world in someone's mind. Monster wasn't very scary. Poor Neil, guy needs a hit and this ain't it.
Please excuse my attempts at humor. It's a defensive reaction.
I really, really wanted to like this film. It has been on my watchlist for like 3 years, and I was constantly checking on it. I hoped for Wan as a director, but when I saw Blomkamp, I was pleasantly surprised. I wouldn't say I liked Elysium, but I think Neill is a talented director.
With that being said, I give this film a lot of credit and a 6/10. It had its moments, but the negatives overcame the positives. As more people will watch it, I think it will drop down to ~5.5 or less.
There were three major problems for me:
1) the dialogue was unbearable most of the time;
2) the amounts of exposition thrown in these were overwhelming. The story comes to a halt for 10-15 minutes, and then BOOM, you get bombarded with information the characters share (the things they already know btw). And it's not that confusing to provide this much flashback.
3) the whole technology/occult combination was fresh, but when they tell you the point of all that, it just becomes a laughable excuse and an insane over-complication of what could have been done.
Throw in some heavy continuity, and the majority of the viewers will probably dislike this. The ending clearly shows that at least 10-15 minutes of it was missing, the main lead teleports way too much, and some scenes end abruptly.
I want to mention some positives as well, the film did look good, and I enjoyed the ending night scenes. I constantly felt like I'm giving this film much more creditworthiness than it's worth, but I saw some potential in it.
And yeah, while interesting in their looks, the simulation scenes lacked creativity, and the entity of which we got no information looks like Radament from Diablo 2.
Overall, this is not a horror film. And as much as I appreciate the effort, I didn't like it as much as I wanted to.
I really, really wanted to like this film. It has been on my watchlist for like 3 years, and I was constantly checking on it. I hoped for Wan as a director, but when I saw Blomkamp, I was pleasantly surprised. I wouldn't say I liked Elysium, but I think Neill is a talented director.
With that being said, I give this film a lot of credit and a 6/10. It had its moments, but the negatives overcame the positives. As more people will watch it, I think it will drop down to ~5.5 or less.
There were three major problems for me:
1) the dialogue was unbearable most of the time;
2) the amounts of exposition thrown in these were overwhelming. The story comes to a halt for 10-15 minutes, and then BOOM, you get bombarded with information the characters share (the things they already know btw). And it's not that confusing to provide this much flashback.
3) the whole technology/occult combination was fresh, but when they tell you the point of all that, it just becomes a laughable excuse and an insane over-complication of what could have been done.
Throw in some heavy continuity, and the majority of the viewers will probably dislike this. The ending clearly shows that at least 10-15 minutes of it was missing, the main lead teleports way too much, and some scenes end abruptly.
I want to mention some positives as well, the film did look good, and I enjoyed the ending night scenes. I constantly felt like I'm giving this film much more creditworthiness than it's worth, but I saw some potential in it.
And yeah, while interesting in their looks, the simulation scenes lacked creativity, and the entity of which we got no information looks like Radament from Diablo 2.
Overall, this is not a horror film. And as much as I appreciate the effort, I didn't like it as much as I wanted to.
Oh dear me , was interested in this film because I'm a big fan of blomkamps other work but this is so dull and boring , the effects are pretty poor as well , ok gutted someone who brought us district 9 and elisium has fallen so far from grace , his oats studio work was better than this , a film from the short rakka could of been great , this film is not scary nor sci fi it's just stupid
and boring .
I'll make this short. Horror is my life; whether it's movies, shows, games or books. Horror is my niche. A 4 is generous which sucks Bc I loved District 9, Elysium and Chappie. Where to start. The main protagonist was utterly trash and annoying. The cinematography was actually cool with the whole VR portrayal. The action was limited. One minor scare. The biggest thing which could have brought it to a 7 for me was the fact that he didn't include what could have constituted a wicked action scene with a Vatican Spec Op Unit; either a lack of budget or time, but regardless it will hurt reviews given time. A Redbox rental at best.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFilmed secretly in Canada over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.
- GaffesWhen Carly is shown back home after the first interlink with her Mother she is in the kitchen with her back to the kitchen bench. You then hear the kettle whistling to tell you it's at its boil. Only when Carly turns round you see that the kettle is electric. To have a whistling kettle it would have to be on a gas stove. Edit: There are electric kettles that do whistle. You've just never seen one until now. Furthermore; It does not matter if a kettle is on a gas or electric stove. The water boiling is what produces the whistle. Not what causes the water to boil.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: Demonic (2021)
- Bandes originalesPiano Sonata No. 14 in C sharp minor, Op. 27 No. 2 'Moonlight' I. Adagio sostenuto
Composed by Ludwig van Beethoven
Published by Flipper srl APM (ASCAP)
Appears courtesy of APM Production Music
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Demonic?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 71 334 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 40 683 $US
- 22 août 2021
- Montant brut mondial
- 366 656 $US
- Durée1 heure 44 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant