Victor Frankenstein, savant ambitieux, donne vie à une créature lors d'une expérience interdite. Dans la vision gothique de Guillermo del Toro, le destin du créateur et du monstre sombre dan... Tout lireVictor Frankenstein, savant ambitieux, donne vie à une créature lors d'une expérience interdite. Dans la vision gothique de Guillermo del Toro, le destin du créateur et du monstre sombre dans la tragédie.Victor Frankenstein, savant ambitieux, donne vie à une créature lors d'une expérience interdite. Dans la vision gothique de Guillermo del Toro, le destin du créateur et du monstre sombre dans la tragédie.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Stars
- Récompenses
- 30 victoires et 161 nominations au total
Résumé
Avis à la une
I've loved Guillermo Del Toro since I was a teenager and I watched Pan's Labyrinth for the first time, and then I made it my goal to see everything he's ever directed. But I've loved Mary Shelley's Frankenstein since I was in elementary school. After I read it the first time, I kept rereading it over and over again.
My issue with this is that this is not Frankenstein. At least, not Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. The story is completely changed, and I'm not sure that it is for the better. I was seeing all these reviewers rage how this is the Frankenstein we deserve and that this is as close as it gets to the actual book. The former is up for debate, but the latter is a straight up lie from someone who's obviously never read or understood the source material.
If this would've been an original story, I would've liked it way more. But seeing as it is supposed to be an adaptation of a childhood favorite of mine, it simply doesn't hold up. Definitely the biggest disappointment of the year for me, and I've been looking forward to this since last year. I was disappointed when I heard that it wasn't playing in theaters near me, but I guess it was for the best.
If you're going to watch this, I would suggest you drop all expectations of it being Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and watch it as it's own original thing.
This film is like an operatic symphony.
It's both beautiful and tragic. Breathtaking and challenging. This is what movies are all about. James Whale would be proud.
I saw this in Japan and because the audience is so respectful I couldn't tell if I was the only one silently weeping in the darkness.
Thank you Guillermo.
The performances are strong across the board. Oscar Isaac offers a convincing, if occasionally a little over-the-top, portrayal of Frankenstein. However, he is ultimately outshined by Jacob Elordi as the Creature. It's a challenging role that could have easily been one-dimensional, but Elordi imbues it with remarkable depth, emotion, and soul - a truly fantastic performance. Christoph Waltz delivers a familiar turn, very much in line with his recent work, while Mia Goth is solid, though it remains to be seen whether she truly lives up to her "next big thing" reputation.
On a technical level, the film excels. The cinematography is stunning, the set design meticulous, and the score beautifully complements the film's emotional tone. The makeup work is exceptional, and while the costumes are impressive, they occasionally verge on being a bit too extravagant.
If there's one major flaw, it's the runtime - the film could easily have been trimmed by at least thirty minutes. Nevertheless, this is a deeply emotional and visually striking experience, and another remarkable addition to Guillermo Del Toro's already distinguished filmography.
The plot and actions had too much inconsistencies and logical fails to be credible. Mary Shelley's original monster was not a superman saving ships. The ending was a cliche.
Most Popular Movies of 2025: #7 Frankenstein
Frankenstein Through the Years
Frankenstein Through the Years
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesVictor Frankenstein's laboratory and Captain Anderson's ship were fully constructed sets. "I want real sets", director Guillermo del Toro explains. "I don't want digital, I don't want AI, I don't want simulation. I want old-fashioned craftsmanship: people painting, building, hammering, plastering."
- GaffesIn 1857, Victor Frankenstein buys dynamite to blow up the Creature. Alfred Nobel did not invent dynamite until 1866, 9 years after the movie was set.
- Citations
The Creature: An idea, a feeling became clear to me. The hunter did not hate the wolf. The wolf did not hate the sheep. But violence felt inevitable between them. Perhaps, I thought, this was the way of the world. It would hunt you and kill you just for being who you are.
- Crédits fousThe Netflix logo is formed by two batteries running an electric charge in Victor Frankenstein's laboratory.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Horror's Greatest: Film Scores (2025)
- Bandes originalesRondeau (Abedelazer)
Written by Henry Purcell
Arranged by Jonathan Scott
Performed by Jonathan Scott
courtesy of: Scott Brothers Duo
Meilleurs choix
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
- How long is Frankenstein?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Dr. Frankenstein
- Lieux de tournage
- North Bay, Nipissing, Ontario, Canada(Location / exteriors - Arctic)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 120 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 144 496 $US
- Durée
- 2h 29min(149 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1






