Goodbye Seventies

2020
Unrated
1h 32min

NOTE IMDb

MA NOTE

Justin Ivan Brown and Chris Rehmann in Goodbye Seventies (2020)

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueRepresents the plight of gay men in the 70's and 80's. The AIDS epidemic is not washed over to make it palatable but I fear it sheds a negative light on the promiscuity of the era. There is ... Tout lireRepresents the plight of gay men in the 70's and 80's. The AIDS epidemic is not washed over to make it palatable but I fear it sheds a negative light on the promiscuity of the era. There is nudity, sexual situations, smoking & drugs!Represents the plight of gay men in the 70's and 80's. The AIDS epidemic is not washed over to make it palatable but I fear it sheds a negative light on the promiscuity of the era. There is nudity, sexual situations, smoking & drugs!

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

NOTE IMDb

4,3/10

345

MA NOTE

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

Vidéos1

Trailer 2:40

GOODBYE SEVENTIES trailer 1

Photos12

+ 7

Avis des utilisateurs11

4,3345

Avis à la une

8vivierskevin

A cult feel

I thought the film was really good. It felt like a true life history event of old films saved from the 70's. It reflected on trauma of past gay history and scenes that could have been real in that time. So funny to see shots of straight cinema showing "arty films". A great step back in time. Thank you.

1Coralknight

As interesting as waiting in line at the DMV

If someone decided to create an extremely low-budget movie about waiting in line at the DMV that ran for an hour and a half, it would still be less painful to watch than this. To call it self-indulgent would be a drastic understatement. There are so many stories about the excesses of the seventies in New York City and the consequences that came after, and this is probably the most boringly tedious of them all. Bad acting, horrible script, hideous cast and even worse editing made this a film to miss at all cost.

1timmoss-26387

Sexploitation at it's worst.

Unappealing cast,no character depth,no real story to speak of,but a bit of titilation ocassionally,of the sort that might amuse curious teens...never mind the actors,an award should be earned by anyone who can last more than 20 minutes of this complete waste of time and money.

1ChicagoMan41

20 Minutes In...and I am OUT

I gave the film 20 minutes to interest me, but it failed. The characters are so unattractive, especially the short fat dark sissy "friend" and the acting is so bad. Tip to directors everywhere: when an actor is not a smoker, and the script requires a smoker, make him learn how to smoke before casting him. These guys, supposedly portraying smokers because almost all adults smoked in the 70's, all look like they never picked up a cigarette or inhaled one before. They all hold them gingerly and do not know how to put them to their lips or inhale like a real smoker does.

3Turgut_Belen

Hmmmmm

It can't get anything worse than this. I forced myself to like this movie but could not...

The saying goes "If you have nothing good to say about, better, not to say anything at all", or something like that. That's what I will do.

Vous aimerez aussi

5,5

Blood-Red Ox

5,5

Strapped for Danger II: Undercover Vice

6,2

5,0

6,6

5,6

5,8

5,9

4,9

7,0

Théo et Hugo dans le même bateau

6,1

Fak Yaass

3,8

The End of Cruising

Gaffes
A character uses the phrase "gay cancer" in 1979. That phrase, used before AIDS was so named because of the high incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma among gay men, was not coined until 1981.