Un Rejimon au coeur brisé et ivre envahit la fosse aux lions du zoo. Forcé d'agir, le garde Haridas plonge pour le sauver, déclenchant une série de bévues hilarantes.Un Rejimon au coeur brisé et ivre envahit la fosse aux lions du zoo. Forcé d'agir, le garde Haridas plonge pour le sauver, déclenchant une série de bévues hilarantes.Un Rejimon au coeur brisé et ivre envahit la fosse aux lions du zoo. Forcé d'agir, le garde Haridas plonge pour le sauver, déclenchant une série de bévues hilarantes.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.
I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.
I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.
I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.
I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.
I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.
I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.
This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.
There is zero creativity. The end.
This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.
There is zero creativity. There is zero creativity.
This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion. There is zero creativity. There is zero creativity.
This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion. This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.
There is zero creativity. The end.
This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.
There is zero creativity. There is zero creativity.
This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion. There is zero creativity. There is zero creativity.
This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion. This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.
Lack of Depth in the Story: While the film is based on an unusual incident, the story lacks depth and feels shallow.
* Flat Comedy: Despite being marketed as a comedy, the humor falls flat in many parts. Most jokes feel forced and fail to elicit laughter from the audience.
* Average Acting: The acting performances from some of the actors are mediocre. They struggle to fully embody their characters.
* Special Effects: The special effects, especially the lion scenes, appear inadequate and out of place.
* Screenplay: The screenplay has several weaknesses, such as unnecessarily long scenes and weak dialogues.
* Direction: The direction lacks a clear vision. The film's pacing is slow, and it fails to move the story forward effectively.
Specific Negative Reviews (Without Watching the Film): * "The story is so unbelievable that it's hard to believe it's based on a true incident." * "The comedy is offensive to the audience. The jokes are not funny at all." * "The acting is so bad that it's painful to watch." * "The special effects are so poor that it seems like a children's film." * "The screenplay has no emotion. It's just a sequence of events." * "The director had no vision for making such a film." If you can provide more information about the film, I can create a more specific and accurate review.
* Have you watched the film?
* What did you like and dislike about the film?
* What kind of films do you prefer?
Based on your feedback, I can tailor a more personalized review.
Other potential negative points: * The film's length might be excessive.
* The background music might seem faded.
* The film's message might not be clearly conveyed.
* Flat Comedy: Despite being marketed as a comedy, the humor falls flat in many parts. Most jokes feel forced and fail to elicit laughter from the audience.
* Average Acting: The acting performances from some of the actors are mediocre. They struggle to fully embody their characters.
* Special Effects: The special effects, especially the lion scenes, appear inadequate and out of place.
* Screenplay: The screenplay has several weaknesses, such as unnecessarily long scenes and weak dialogues.
* Direction: The direction lacks a clear vision. The film's pacing is slow, and it fails to move the story forward effectively.
Specific Negative Reviews (Without Watching the Film): * "The story is so unbelievable that it's hard to believe it's based on a true incident." * "The comedy is offensive to the audience. The jokes are not funny at all." * "The acting is so bad that it's painful to watch." * "The special effects are so poor that it seems like a children's film." * "The screenplay has no emotion. It's just a sequence of events." * "The director had no vision for making such a film." If you can provide more information about the film, I can create a more specific and accurate review.
* Have you watched the film?
* What did you like and dislike about the film?
* What kind of films do you prefer?
Based on your feedback, I can tailor a more personalized review.
Other potential negative points: * The film's length might be excessive.
* The background music might seem faded.
* The film's message might not be clearly conveyed.
Sometimes you know what you're signing up for, but you do it anyway. I expected a poor outcome, but not *this* poor, especially considering the star cast.
A drunk man, heartbroken, accidentally walks into a lion's cage, sparking a chain of hilarious events as he tries to escape with the help of a zoo employee who gets stuck with him.
The film claims to be inspired by real life, but the plot is wafer-thin and hardly progresses, leaving you yawning. For a comedy, there are very few moments where you actually chuckle. The absurdity of the film is apparent throughout the screenplay.
Kunchacko Boban overdoes his role to the point where you cringe, which is surprising since he usually performs well. Suraj Venjaramoodu does fine, but there's only so much one can do with a script this bad. Interestingly, Shruti Ramachandran showcases her acting chops in her limited screen time. The other characters are as silly as can be, with Manju Pillai, Shobi Thilakan, and many more contributing little substance to the movie.
The media circus featuring Ramesh Pisharody and Parvathi R. Krishna is an interesting watch and feels realistic in this otherwise absurd drama. Logic takes a backseat, and the jokes fall flat. Jay K, as both director and writer, needs to refine his skills. The scenes with the lion, however, are done quite well and deserve praise.
This is one of the most cringe-worthy movies of the year, and you should stay as far away from it as possible.
#pranureviews #Grrr #GrrrReview.
A drunk man, heartbroken, accidentally walks into a lion's cage, sparking a chain of hilarious events as he tries to escape with the help of a zoo employee who gets stuck with him.
The film claims to be inspired by real life, but the plot is wafer-thin and hardly progresses, leaving you yawning. For a comedy, there are very few moments where you actually chuckle. The absurdity of the film is apparent throughout the screenplay.
Kunchacko Boban overdoes his role to the point where you cringe, which is surprising since he usually performs well. Suraj Venjaramoodu does fine, but there's only so much one can do with a script this bad. Interestingly, Shruti Ramachandran showcases her acting chops in her limited screen time. The other characters are as silly as can be, with Manju Pillai, Shobi Thilakan, and many more contributing little substance to the movie.
The media circus featuring Ramesh Pisharody and Parvathi R. Krishna is an interesting watch and feels realistic in this otherwise absurd drama. Logic takes a backseat, and the jokes fall flat. Jay K, as both director and writer, needs to refine his skills. The scenes with the lion, however, are done quite well and deserve praise.
This is one of the most cringe-worthy movies of the year, and you should stay as far away from it as possible.
#pranureviews #Grrr #GrrrReview.
*** Grrr Malayalam Movie Review ***
Directed by Jay. K starring Kunchacko Boban Suraj Venjaramoodu in lead roles. Also starring Anagha, Sruti Ramchandran, Manju Pillai & Rajesh Madhavan
One Line Review : Expected Laughter got shot by a tranquilizer gun.
The story is about Rajimon Nadar played by Kunchacko getting drunk and falling into the lion's den in a Zoo located in Trivandrum. Now how the security officer Haridas played by Suraj Venjaramoodu and other rescue people tries to rescue forms the rest part.
When I came to know the movie is directed by Ezra Malayalam Movie Director & post seeing the teaser and trailer of Grrr there were expectations but it was not as per the expectation.
Laughter moments the movie produced but it was being severly shot by tranquilizer in the form of week screenplay.
When Haridas also gets stuck up along with Rajimon in lion's den till they are safely taken out there were laughter moments but it was up to mark
The film should have focused more on the survival part with some twists, turns, tension blended with laughter but it didn't capture which made the film fail.
Performance wise, Suraj able to perform his safe zone but that too was limited. Kunchacko Boban was feeling a kind of mis-cast.
Overall a one time watchable over an OTT platform.
Directed by Jay. K starring Kunchacko Boban Suraj Venjaramoodu in lead roles. Also starring Anagha, Sruti Ramchandran, Manju Pillai & Rajesh Madhavan
One Line Review : Expected Laughter got shot by a tranquilizer gun.
The story is about Rajimon Nadar played by Kunchacko getting drunk and falling into the lion's den in a Zoo located in Trivandrum. Now how the security officer Haridas played by Suraj Venjaramoodu and other rescue people tries to rescue forms the rest part.
When I came to know the movie is directed by Ezra Malayalam Movie Director & post seeing the teaser and trailer of Grrr there were expectations but it was not as per the expectation.
Laughter moments the movie produced but it was being severly shot by tranquilizer in the form of week screenplay.
When Haridas also gets stuck up along with Rajimon in lion's den till they are safely taken out there were laughter moments but it was up to mark
The film should have focused more on the survival part with some twists, turns, tension blended with laughter but it didn't capture which made the film fail.
Performance wise, Suraj able to perform his safe zone but that too was limited. Kunchacko Boban was feeling a kind of mis-cast.
Overall a one time watchable over an OTT platform.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 174 050 $US
- Durée2 heures 1 minute
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant