Lorsque l'attaque initiale des Cylons contre les Douze Colonies échoue à réaliser l'extermination complète de la vie humaine comme prévu, Cavils embarqués sur Galactica et Caprica doivent im... Tout lireLorsque l'attaque initiale des Cylons contre les Douze Colonies échoue à réaliser l'extermination complète de la vie humaine comme prévu, Cavils embarqués sur Galactica et Caprica doivent improviser pour détruire les survivants humains.Lorsque l'attaque initiale des Cylons contre les Douze Colonies échoue à réaliser l'extermination complète de la vie humaine comme prévu, Cavils embarqués sur Galactica et Caprica doivent improviser pour détruire les survivants humains.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
- Jean Barolay
- (as Alisen Down)
Avis à la une
This review will be extremely short, as talking about much of it at all would be spoiling both the movie and the series.
The movie basically follows 'Number 1,' both the one on Caprica and the one in the fleet, and how they change throughout the course of the series. Unfortunately, it only covers up through season 2, so this so called "Plan" was boiled down to simply kill all humans. Nothing the audience of BSG didn't already know, right? The movie was okay, but it ended up feeling like a long string of deleted scenes from the series. If you have seen the whole series, then it is a must-see, even if there is nothing new.
Taken as a standalone movie, it is easily a 1/10. However, there is NO WAY someone who has not seen the entire series of BSG should even consider watching this. It doesn't introduce anything new really, but it is a decent addition/companion to the series that all hardcore fans need to see.
It is a shame because had this been built into the show then perhaps it would have worked better, but by coming after the series has concluded one does have to take this film as a standalone. As such it has the themes of the show, the events of the show and the narratives and the only difference is that we have some new material which acts as framing to allow a new angle to be put on the events. I say angle rather than perspective because "perspective" suggests that there is some insight or opinion to be gained from the different telling whereas angle just suggests the same thing from a different view point and that is what the film is. Watching it is a bit irritating because the new material is sporadically interesting but it never lasts long and it is not strong enough to "be" the film and as a result the film remains about the threads that we have already seen – and these are not different enough due to the new angle to be particularly worth seeing.
The cast do what they did originally (in some cases exactly the same since many are only in old footage) but I did think that Stockwell did well in his additional scenes. Other than that though there is not much else to say – the film doesn't add much and for those who have seen the series (and if you haven't why are you watching this?) the vast majority of it will be just the same material from a slightly different angle, with the new material being the same themes from a different angle. Built into the series (like Razor) then maybe this could have washed (big maybe) but as a standalone film after the fact it just feels like an accountant has done the maths and tried to work out how to keep getting the revenues that BSG brought in before it finished.
Overall, not absolutely terrible but pointless and nothing interesting or new. 4/10 Bethany Cox
Really I would say that this film is for Battlestar Gallactica completists. Hopefully Battlestar will do a film explaining all the stuff they didn't bother to explain about Star Buck but somehow I doubt that will happen.
The pace is slow. A fly crawling up a drape makes better progress.
If you watch the whole thing (and many will not) you will be haunted by the notion that the producers saw this as an easy payday and a chance to reuse footage from earlier episodes.
Maybe. Maybe not.
The rating I gave tells the tale. Dean Stockwell gives the performance of his life. There is a scene at the 1:40 mark involving Stockwell, a small boy, an apple and a knife. It is mesmerizing Which is more than I can say of the movie
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDirector Edward James Olmos stated in the DVD commentary that he made several homages to Le garçon aux cheveux verts (1948), which starred a then twelve year old Dean Stockwell. Stockwell portrayed Peter Fry, a war orphan whose hair inexplicably turned green when he discovered that his parents had been killed during the Second World War. One example was when Cavil asked the boy John "Are you a war orphan?". This question was asked of Peter Fry several times in Le garçon aux cheveux verts (1948).
Olmos also used a still shot picture of Peter Fry from the movie when casting for the character of John the Boy, because he wanted the actor to bear a strong resemblance to how Stockwell looked in his adolescence. Alex Ferris resemblance to Stockwell's picture helped get him cast. At one point, Olmos wanted John the Boy's hair color to be green like Peter Fry's character, but was ultimately overruled by the producers.
- Gaffes"Simon O'Neill" has a stepson, Jeremy. However, "Tough Six" refers to Simon and his daughter.
- Citations
The Hybrid: Progress reports arriving. The farms of Aerilon are burning. The beaches of Canceron are burning. The plains of Leonis are burning. The jungles of Scorpia are burning. The pastures of Tauron are burning. The harbors of Picon are burning. The cities of Caprica are burning. The oceans of Aquaria are burning. The courthouses of Libran are burning. The forests of Virgon are burning. The Temples of Gemenon are burning. The Colonies of Man lie trampled at our feet.
- Crédits fousThe Universal logo replaces the Earth with the planet Caprica.
- ConnexionsFollows Battlestar Galactica (2003)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Durée1 heure 52 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1